UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

APACHE CORPORATION

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

 No fee required.
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 (5) 

Total fee paid:

 

     

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

 (3) 

Filing Party:

 

     

 (4) 

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


LOGOLOGO


 

 

LOGOLOGO


LOGO

FROM OUR CHAIRMAN OFTHE BOARD

 

LOGO  

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

 

On behalf of the entire Board, I would like to thank all ofThis year we continued on our shareholders for your continued support.

Over the past several years, we have been on amulti-year journey to transform Apache.Apache and execute on our strategy to create long-term value for our shareholders. Management and the Board have streamlinedremained focused on continuing to strategically balance and streamline our portfolio, refocused themaintaining our disciplined financial approach, and ensuring our investments and capital allocation process from volume growth to returns and value, and strategically transitioned the Company from ‘acquire and exploit’ to ‘returns-focused organic growth.’ In 2017,generate meaningful full-cycle returns.

Building on this foundation, we continued tomade significant progress on our strategic priorities in 2018 that will position the Companyus for long-term profitable growth, irrespectivevalue creation and returns to shareholders going forward; we:

u

Continued to invest in ourtop-tier Permian Basin position including the establishment of the oilAltus Midstream in partnership with Kayne Anderson Acquisition Corp., which leverages our midstream capabilities and gas price environment:long-term investment in Alpine High to create a premier midstream enterprise to service Alpine High and other Permian assets,

 

u  In August, we completed

Drove outstanding operational results across our strategic exit from Canada, as we move to increasingly weight Apache’s portfolio, towards ourincluding 13 percent adjusted production growth, 17 percent Permian assets — includingoil production growth year-over-year, and 152 percent reserve replacement; achieved substantial reductions in drilling, completion and equipment costs at Alpine High — which offer a unique combination of high returnswhile significantly ramping production; and tremendous scale.initiated our next growth phase in Egypt where we’re conducting seismic testing that has already identified new leads on both existing and newly acquired concessions,

 

u  We drove substantial progress

Continued to leverage the high margins, high returns, and significant free cash flow from our international assets in Egypt and the Alpine High, our new world-class resource play containing five distinct hydrocarbon-bearing formations in upNorth Sea, driven by higher Brent oil price exposure, to 6,000 feet of vertical column across a large, contiguous acreage footprint. Since confirming the discovery in September 2016, we drilled 70+ wells to verify our understandingfacilitate development of the play, achieved first gas sales two months ahead of schedule, and exceeded production targets.Permian Basin while maintaining financial flexibility,

 

u  We continued

Accelerated initial production at Garten in the North Sea from first-quarter 2019 to maintain a strong financial position supporting our dividendfourth-quarter 2018, which was only seven months after its discovery and capital program. We also entered into financial commodity contractswhich is expected to further support our high priority investments without compromising Apache’s financial flexibility given continued commodity price volatility.exceed 7.4 million barrels of recoverable light oil plus associated natural gas,

 

u  We

Promoted the optimization of our portfolio through the strategic review of organic growth opportunities, acreage acquisitions, and asset sales, while continuing to progress our testing and technical evaluations in growth areas such as Suriname and Alpine High,

u

Continued our focus on improving long-term returns, achieving a cash return on invested incapital that exceeded our extensive inventoryplan target of 18 percent, and

step-outu exploration and development opportunities in Egypt and the North Sea, generating strong

Reinforced our commitment to living within cash flow from such international assetsoperations while also returning capital to shareholders by purchasing 7.8 million shares and feedingauthorizing the repurchase of up to an additional 40 million shares, representing over 10 percent of shares outstanding. Our returns focused approach is driving our investmentcommitment to return at least 50 percent of cash flow in Apache’stop-tier Permian assets.excess of plan, inclusive of asset sale proceeds, to investors before increasing planned activity levels. This builds on the shareholder-focused approach we have consistently demonstrated throughout the downturn, by not cutting the dividend or issuing equity to fund asset acquisitions.

We continueEngagement remains paramount to focus on substantive engagement with our shareholdersBoard and othermanagement as a means to gather feedback and to ensure accountability and responsiveness to our various stakeholders. ManagementDuring 2018, management and the Board engaged in an extensive schedulemet with a broad range of meetings with the investment community, holding 82 meetings with shareholders, representing 58 percent of Apache’s shares outstanding,investors and other stakeholders to gather feedback ondiscuss our business strategy, corporate governance, executive compensation program, sustainability practices, and sustainability oversight. We also hosted numerous other meetings, each focused on a distinct environmental or social issue, such as carbon asset risk or greenhouse gas emissions reporting.

Feedback gained over the course of these discussions contributed to the enhancements described in our latest sustainability report, recent changes madeShareholder feedback is communicated to our full Board, and the input we received directly informed recent enhancements to our executive compensation program and our incorporation of expanded disclosure below regarding thein this year’s proxy statement.

Our Board evaluation process.

As we look ahead, our teamalso continues to drive momentum through our emphasis on consistent improvement and innovation, and a sense of urgency. The Board’s focus on capitalizingits role of engaging with management and stakeholders to ensure alignment with Apache’s vision, mission, and strategy. Consistently taking the lead in advancing Apache’s corporate culture of integrity and adhering to our core values, including safety, respect, honesty, and environmental responsibility, is a critical aspect of our Board’s governance and oversight functions. Further engagement on this momentum is unwavering.these issues with shareholders, management, employees, and other stakeholders in the communities in which we operate remains a top priority.

Thank youMoving into 2019, we remain keenly aware of the need to maintain capital and financial discipline in the face of oil, gas, and natural gas liquids price volatility.

On behalf of the entire Board, I would like to thank all of our shareholders for your continuedongoing support and investment in Apache.Apache as we continue on our transformation. I look forward to continuing to make progress on our strategic priorities and generating significant value for our shareholders for years to come.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

John E. Lowe

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

Apache Corporation

April 9, 2018

LOGO2019


noticeLOGO

FROM OUR MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT & COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

As the independent Management Development & Compensation Committee of annual meetingApache Corporation, our most important mandate is to structure our executive compensation programs to create close alignment with our shareholders’ interests, while continuing to attract and retain talented executives to execute the Company’s strategy and create long-term value.

Shareholder Feedback:

We regularly seek feedback from our shareholders regarding our compensation practices. Over the course of shareholdersthe past year:

 

u

Prior to our 2018 Annual Meeting, we reached out directly to shareholders representing 70 percent of shares outstanding. Shareholders representing 63 percent of shares outstanding either met with us or indicated that a meeting would not be necessary.

 

u

After our 2018 Annual Meeting and during our annual comprehensive review of the Company’s compensation practices, we considered our shareholders’ feedback as we identified opportunities to strengthen our compensation practices.

u

After completing our annual comprehensive review, we offered to meet once again with our shareholders to obtain their feedback regarding the changes we were contemplating. We reached out directly to shareholders representing 78 percent of shares outstanding. We then met with shareholders representing 53 percent of shares outstanding, with the others indicating that a meeting would not be necessary.

We made our independent chairman and chair of the MD&C Committee available for these discussions unless a shareholder preferred to speak with one or the other, or with management, directly.

As a result of this holistic shareholder engagement process, we have introduced many positive changes to our disclosures and compensation practices that appear to have widespread shareholder support. The changes, as well as the elements of our programs that remain unchanged, reflect the MD&C Committee’s response to the feedback we have received from our shareholders. Our response to shareholder feedback includes the following changes:

Annual Incentive Compensation Plan Changes:

u

Implemented a scorecard approach for the MD&C Committee’s strategic goal assessment to promote transparency and differentiate between quantitative and qualitative metrics, answering the question “How did the MD&C Committee weight and score each goal?” – see page 45

u

Explained the business rationale for each strategic goal, answering the question “How does each goal advance the Company’s long-term strategy?” – see page 38

u

Placed greater emphasis on the Company’s returns focus by introducing a cash return on invested capital (CROIC) metric with a weighting of 20 percent in the 2018 program, and increasing the weighting to 25 percent in the 2019 program – see pages 38 and 51

u

Considered reduction in methane emissions intensity and fresh water usage in the assessment of the health, safety, security, and environment (HSSE) operational goal – see pages 28 and 38

2019 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Changes:

u

Increased the weighting of long-term performance awards for all executives from 50 percent to 55 percent, so that our performance-based plan now constitutes a majority of the long-term incentive compensation program – see pages 28, 46, and 51

u

Introduced a cap at target in the relative TSR portion of the performance share program in the event of negative absolute TSR, which supplements the negative discretion held by the MD&C Committee – see pages 28, 30, and 52

u

Replaced the currentnon-TSR metrics in the performance share program with a long-term CROIC metric that is linked to the corporate plan, set at the beginning of the period, and measured over three years – see pages 27, 47, and 51

u

Replaced stock options with cash-based RSU awards tied to Altus Midstream Company, Apache’s majority-owned midstream enterprise established in 2018 – see pages 28 and 52


u

Enhanced disclosure around the 2016-2018 performance share program payout, including specifics regarding the overall TSR rank and quantitative measures – see pages 28, 48, and 49

Other Compensation Program Changes:

u

Increased the stock ownership requirement of the CEO and President from 6x base salary to 10x base salary in order to ensure ongoing alignment with our shareholders’ interests – see pages 28, 31, and 52

u

Identified differentiated peer groups: (1) a compensation peer group that takes into account our competition for executive talent among oil and gas exploration and production companies that, like Apache, operate in the United States and internationally, and (2) a TSR performance peer group that takes into account a balanced view of market competition for the production and sale of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids from conventional and unconventional resources – see pages 29 and 53

u

For the second straight year, held flat the CEO and President’s base salary, target bonus, and target equity – see pages 28 and 36

The changes outlined above are in addition to the enhancements that were put into place in 2017 for our 2018 compensation program. The 2018 program changes were based on direct feedback we obtained from our shareholders in 2017 and early 2018 and include:

u

Increased the weighting of the operational goals within the annual incentive compensation plan from 50 to 60 percent, which has been maintained in the 2019 program – see pages 28 and 36

u

As noted above, added a CROIC metric to the annual incentive compensation plan weighted at 20 percent, which has been increased to 25 percent in the 2019 program – see pages 38 and 51

u

Added a strategic goal focused on a plan for realizing long-term, double-digit return on capital employed (ROCE) – see pages 27 and 38

u

Reduced the CEO and President’s enhanced life insurance benefit by 75 percent to align with market practices – see page 50

u

Held flat the CEO and President’s base salary, target bonus, and target equity – see pages 28 and 36

The MD&C Committee is dedicated to ensuring that our compensation programs motivate long-term value creation. We believe the changes to our compensation programs help advance that prime objective. Taking into account shareholder feedback, we assess changes, and indeed all elements of the program, against the Company’s strategic focus:

u

Operate safely and environmentally responsibly

u

Generate competitive returns

u

Maintain cash flow neutrality, production and reserves growth, and a balanced portfolio

u

Return value to shareholders in the form of dividend payments, share repurchases, and debt reduction

u

Focus on high-impact exploration opportunities

u

Employ leading technology strategies

During the period 2015 to 2018, for example, we reduced methane emissions intensity and fresh water usage, maintained our dividend payments, repurchased shares, reduced our debt, avoided shareholder dilution, increased our Permian Region production, sustained robust free cash flow from our Egypt and North Sea regions, developed differential exploration opportunities in the U.S. and Suriname, created a new U.S. midstream entity anchored by our Alpine High assets, and strategically balanced our portfolio through the divestment of noncore assets. In addition, Apache is on track to achieve long-term, sustainable double-digit CROIC, as well as steady reserves and production growth utilizing enhanced technology strategies. In all of these ways, the period 2015 to 2018 has truly been transformative.

While the market absorbs the full import of this strategic transformation, we want to ensure that our compensation programs align with our shareholders’ experience. This is reflected in our CEO and President’s realized pay (including equity that vested during this period valued as of the vest date). During this pivotal 2015 to 2018 period, our CEO and President’s realized compensation was 48.5 percent lower than reported pay for the period. This compares to the Company’s stock price performance during that same period of-58.1 percent, excluding dividends. This strong alignment is now further reinforced by the CEO and President’s new stock ownership requirement of 10x his base salary, evidencing an unwavering commitment to long-term value creation.


We believe that our compensation programs will continue to help us attract and retain talented executives capable of leading and managing a multidimensional, multinational exploration and production company. In the spirit of Apache’s longstanding core values, which include seeking relentless improvement in all facets, we look forward to receiving your continuous feedback.

Sincerely,

Members of the Management Development and

Compensation Committee

William C. Montgomery, Chairman

Annell R. Bay

Rene R. Joyce

Daniel W. Rabun

April 9, 2019


LOGO

One Post Oak Central, 2000 Post Oak Boulevard,

Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400

 

 

LOGO

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Thursday, May 24, 201823, 2019

10:00 a.m. Houston Time,

Hilton Houston Post Oak,

2001 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 7705677056-4401

The 20182019 annual meeting of shareholders of Apache Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held on Thursday, May 24, 2018,23, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. (Houston time), at the Hilton Houston Post Oak, 2001 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056-4401, for the following purposes:

 

1.

Election of the ten directors named in the attached proxy statement to serve until the Company’s annual meeting in 2019;2020;

2.

Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2018;2019;

3.

Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and

4.

Transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Holders of record of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on March 26, 2018,25, 2019, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote as soon as possible. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail, the section titled “How to Vote” beginning on page 112 of this proxy statement, or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, your enclosed proxy card.

Houston, Texas

April 9, 20182019

By order of the Board of Directors

 

LOGO

Rajesh Sharma

Corporate Secretary

APACHE CORPORATION

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 24, 2018:23, 2019:

This proxy statement, along with the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended

December 31, 2017,2018, are available free of charge on the Company’s website at

http://www.apachecorp.comwww.proxydocs.com/APA


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This executive summary provides an overview of the information contained within this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement prior to voting.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders Roadmap

LOGO

ANNUAL MEETING SHAREHOLDER OF SHAREHOLDERS VOTING MATTERS THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018 BOARD’S VOTING PAGE 10 A.M. (Houston time) PROPOSAL RECOMMENDATION REFERENCE Election of FOR EACH HILTON HOUSTON POST OAK directors NOMINEE 2001 POST OAK BOULEVARD Ratification of appointment FOR HOUSTON, TEXAS 77056 of independent auditors SHAREHOLDERS AS OF THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS MARCH 26, 2018 Advisory vote approving FOR executive compensation This proxy statement, along with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, are available on the Company’s website at www.apachecorp.com. On March [_], 2018, we began mailing this proxy statement to shareholders who requested paper copies.

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

3


2017 Business Highlights

In 2017, Apache continued its mission to grow in an innovative, safe, environmentally responsible, and profitable manner for the long-term benefit of our shareholders. We also progressed Apache’s strategy of deliveringtop-tier returns by maximizing recovery and minimizing costs through continuous improvement. Highlights of our operational, strategic, and financial achievements are provided below:

LOGO

The Board and management will continue to take steps to position Apache for future success in the current commodity price environment and to further our transition to becoming the premier exploration and production company with global assets focused on U.S. growth and anchored by the Permian Basin.

OPERATIONAL Average liquids and natural gas production across operations 457 Mboe/d Mboe/d = thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day Crude oil represented 53 percent of total liquids production Initiated first sales at Alpine High and ramped to 25,000 boe/d at year end 11 %/ 26% / 15% Outperformed targets in key health, safety, security, and environmental goals Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR), Days Away, Restricted or Transferred Rate (DART), and Vehicle Incident Rate (VIR), respectively 124% Reserve replacement rate 230 MMboe of total proved reserves added in 2017 STRATEGIC 5,000+ Increased Alpine High location count to 5,000+ future drilling 340,000 net contiguous acres in the southern portion of the Delaware Basin locations Exited Canada Proceeds funded construction of our buildout of key infrastructure at Alpine High FINANCIAL $1.4 billion Aggregate proceeds raised from non-core asset/acreage sales Eliminated $818 million in future asset retirement obligations Year-end liquidity, which includes: $ 5.2 billion $3.5 billion in undrawn credit facility and $1.7 billion in cash and cash equivalents Current credit facility matures in June 2020

4

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance Highlights

u   Separate chairman and CEO

u   Independentnon-executive chairman

u   Majority vote standard for the election of directors

u   No poison pill

u   Right to call a special meeting at 15 percent

u   Officer and director stock ownership requirements, including pay multiples and hold-until-retirement provisions

u   20 percent female representation among our non-employee directors

u   Policies against hedging, pledging, and stock option repricing

u   Clawbacks of incentive awards in the event of a material negative restatement

u   Double triggers for cash severance and accelerated vesting of equity upon a change in control

u   Board-adopted human rights principles and statement on indigenous peoples

u   Expanded disclosure of our political expenditures

u   Robust Board review and Board refreshment practices

u   Long-standing shareholder engagement practices

u   Proxy access bylaw adopted in February 2016

u   Board declassification and annual election of all directors

Board and Shareholder Engagement

The Board maintains a process for shareholders and interested parties to communicate with the Board. Shareholders and interested parties may write or call our Board as provided below:

LOGO

We are committed to a robust shareholder engagement program. The Board values our shareholders’ perspectives, and feedback from shareholders on our business, corporate governance, executive compensation, and sustainability practices are important considerations for Board discussions throughout the year. Over the course of the year, our team held 82 meetings with shareholders representing 58 percent of shares outstanding, in total, including meetings with 17 of our top 25 investors. Members of management participated in each meeting, with certain engagements including an independent director. Our year-round focus on shareholder outreach is described in more detail below.

LOGO

write corporate secretary apache corporation 2000 post oak blvd. suite 100 houston, tx 77056-4400 call investor relations 713-296-6000 email ir@apachecorp.com attend apache annual meeting www.apachecorp.com/annualmeeting 2017-2018 august to october meet with shareholders and consider issues raised. november to january continue to meet with shareholders, modify meeting content based on early feedback, and identify any other areas of concern. february to april complete shareholder meetings, meet internally to review feedback received, and consider modification of governance policies and compensation plans. may to july review and summarize feedback from annual meeting and identify potential areas of concern. write corporate secretary apache corporation 2000 post oak blvd. suite 100 houston, tx 77056-4400 call investor relations 713-296-6000 email ir@apachecorp.com attend apache annual meeting www.apachecorp.com/annualmeeting 2017-2018 august to october meet with shareholders and consider issues raised. november to january continue to meet with shareholders, modify meeting content based on early feedback, and identify any other areas of concern. february to april complete shareholder meetings, meet internally to review feedback received, and consider modification of governance policies and compensation plans. may to july review and summarize feedback from annual meeting and identify potential areas of concern. Board Refreshment and SuccessionBOARD MEMBER TENURE COMMITTED TO BOARD REFRESHMENTReduction in the Board’s average tenure from 17 years in 2013 to 6years through year-end 2017Reduction in the average age of the Board from 68 in 2013 to 61through year-end 2017CG&N committee regularly evaluates size and composition of the BoardMandatory director retirement age of 75Please see the discussion of criteria for new Board members andre-election of Board members on page [_] of this proxy statement.18%55%27%MORE THAN 6 YEARS3 TO 6 YEARS0 TO 2 YEARS

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

5


In addition, each year, we: (i) conduct multiple meetings with shareholder groups to discuss governance issues, (ii) conduct anin-person meeting between our CEO and our “lead active shareholder,” who is designated by a group of our more involved shareholders to discuss environmental, social, and governance issues and progress on previously set targets and goals for the coming year, (iii) participate with our shareholders in various governance forums, and (iv) as appropriate, facilitate meetings between shareholders and our directors. Our meetings and interactions with shareholders are designed to better understand how our shareholders perceive Apache and to provide our investors an opportunity to discuss matters that they think deserve attention. We also remain committed to broad stakeholder engagement. Since 2015, we have implemented an expanded community engagement tracking and response system, to help us adequately resolve and learn from discussions and outreach with community leaders in areas where we operate and, in 2016, we set up a separate, toll-free hotline number, the Apache Good Neighbor Line, specifically for any community grievances. This comprehensive feedback system facilitates aggregated analysis to help identify trends and share lessons learned across Apache. We believe the diversity of our engagement practices – with both shareholders and other key stakeholders – collectively provides for a robust, open exchange of ideas and perspectives, and is an asset for our Board and management team.

Board Refreshment and Succession

LOGO

Board Nominees (pg. 15)

Below are the directors nominated for election by shareholders to an additionalone-year term. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” each of the directors.

LOGO

AGE SERVING COMMITTEES INDEPENDENT (as of YE’17) SINCE SERVED Annell R. Bay 62 2014 CG&N Chairman, MD&C YES John J. Christmann IV 51 2015 NOT APPLICABLE NO Chansoo Joung 57 2011 Audit Chairman, CG&N YES Rene R. Joyce 70 2017 MD&C YES George D. Lawrence 67 1996 Audit YES John E. Lowe 58 2013 Non-Executive Chairman YES William C. Montgomery 56 2011 MD&C Chairman, CG&N YES Amy H. Nelson 48 2014 Audit YES Daniel W. Rabun 63 2015 MD&C YES Peter A. Ragauss 60 2014 Audit YES ATTENDANCE BOARD AUDIT CG&N MD&C RATE % Annell R. Bay C 100 John J. Christmann IV 100 Chansoo Joung C 100 Rene R. Joyce 100 George D. Lawrence 100 John E. Lowe C 100 William C. Montgomery C 100 Amy H. Nelson 100 Rodman D. Patton* 100 Daniel W. Rabun 100 Peter A. Ragauss 100

6

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


Board and Committee Composition

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Corporate Governance and Nominating (CG&N) Committee, and a Management Development and Compensation (MD&C) Committee. Below are our directors, their committee memberships, and their 2017 attendance rates for regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings.

LOGO

* On February 8, 2018, Mr. Patton, who will reach Apache’s mandatory director retirement age of 75 in June 2018, notified the Board of his intention not to stand for re-election at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders, which would mark the expiration of his current term as a director of Apache.

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

7


Key Qualifications

The following are some of the key qualifications and skills of our Board.

LOGO

The lack of a mark for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification, characteristic, skill, or experience. We look to each director to be knowledgeable in these areas; however, the mark indicates that the item is a particularly prominent qualification, characteristic, skill, or experience that the director brings to the Board.

LOGO

Our Board reflects Apache’s desire that directors have the broad expertise and perspective needed to govern our business and strengthen and support senior management.

How We Pay

Our executive compensation program consists of the following elements:

u

Base salary;

u

Annual cash incentive bonus;

u

Long-term compensation (performance shares, restricted stock units, and stock options); and

u

Benefits.

CEO/ FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL/ SENIOR OFFICER REPORTING INDUSTRY GLOBAL REGULATORY EXPERIENCE EXPERIENCE EXPERIENCE EXPERIENCE EXPERIENCE Annell R. Bay John J. Christmann IV Chansoo Joung Rene R. Joyce George D. Lawrence John E. Lowe William C. Montgomery Amy H. Nelson Rodman D. Patton Daniel W. Rabun Peter A. Ragauss 64% 82% 100% 82% 64% CEO/ Financial Industry Global Environmental/ Senior Reporting Experience Experience Regulatory Officer Experience Experience Experience

8

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


2017 Executive Compensation Actions

Executive Compensation (pg. 33)

u

We removed the annual relative TSR measure (weighted 10 percent) from the annual cash incentive bonus to avoid overlap with our long-term compensation program;

u

We expanded the Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental (HSSE) goals component of the annual cash incentive bonus to include a comprehensive qualitative assessment of leading and lagging measures, in order to drive excellence in facets of HSSE beyond safety;

u

We further enhanced the rigor of our reserve replacement goal for the annual cash incentive plan, to focus on quality (Finding & Development cost/BOED) of reserves in addition to quantity (as a percent of production);

u

We reduced the enhanced life insurance benefit for the CEO by 75 percent to better align with market practice;

u

We modified outstanding restricted stock unit awards to allow continued vesting upon retirement after attaining age 55 and a certain combination of age and years of service to better align with market practice;

u

The MD&C Committee determined to award the corporate performance element under the annual cash incentive program at 95 percent of target, which included an eight percent discretionary reduction from the calculated achievement of 103 percent. This was at the lower end of the 88 percent to 118 percent range actually achieved, due to underperformance of our operational goals and to better align outcomes with the decline in our stock price during 2017;

u

For the NEOs, the 2017 long-term compensation awards were based 50 percent in performance shares, 35 percent in restricted stock units, and 15 percent in options;

u

We provided 76 percent of the CEO’s 2017 compensation in long-term equity-based awards; and

u

For the 2018 annual cash incentive plan, we included a cash return on invested capital (CROIC) measure (weighted 20 percent) and a new strategic goal related to double-digit ROCE to further intensify our focus on efficient, profitable operations and respond to feedback gained from our investors.

Performance-Based Compensation Outcomes

Compensation outcomes from performance incentives aligned with the performance achieved as follows:

u

The annual cash incentive program delivered a 95 percent-of-target outcome to our NEOs based on the operational, financial, and strategic performance factors described inAnnual Cash Incentive Bonus (pg. 41).

u

The 2015 Performance Share program ended on December 31, 2017 with results yielding a payout at target, based on Apache’s relative TSR rank of 6th.

Ratification of Auditors (pg. 64)

Although shareholder ratification is not required, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2018 is being submitted for ratification at the annual meeting because the Board believes doing so is a good corporate governance practice. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the Company’s independent auditors.

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

9


Table of Contents

 

PROXY STATEMENT   112 
GENERAL   112 
PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING   112 
WHO CAN VOTE   112 
HOW TO VOTE   112 
VOTING 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN SHARES   123 
REVOKING A PROXY   123 
QUORUM   123 
VOTES NEEDED   123 
WHO COUNTS THE VOTES   134 
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL NOS. 1 – 10)   145 

Nominees for Election as Directors

   156 

Director Independence

   2112 

Standing Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors

   2213

Board and Committee Evaluations

14 

Criteria for New Board Members andRe-Election of Board Members

   2415 

Report of the Audit Committee

   2516 

Director Compensation

   2718 

Director Compensation Table

   2920 

Securities Ownership and Principal Holders

   3021 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   3122 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

   3123 

Executive Officers of the Company

   3223 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION   3325 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis   3326 
Management Development and CompensationMD&C Committee Report   5158 
Summary Compensation Table   5259 
All Other Compensation   5360 
Grants of Plan Based Awards Table   5562 
Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End Table   5865 
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table   5966 
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table   6067 
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control   6168 
CEO Pay Ratio   6269 
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation   6370 
Certain Business Relationships and Transactions   6370 
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS (PROPOSAL NO. 11)   6471 
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (PROPOSAL NO. 12)   6673 
FUTURE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS   6774 
SHAREHOLDERS WITH THE SAME LAST NAME AND ADDRESS   6875 
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES   6976 

Information on our website and any other website referenced herein is not incorporated by reference into, and does not constitute a part of, this proxy statement.

 

10

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

1


PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL

 

This proxy statement contains information about the 20182019 annual meeting of shareholders of Apache Corporation. In this proxy statement both “Apache” and the “Company” refer to Apache Corporation. This proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card are being made available to you by the Company’s Board of Directors starting on or about April 9, 2018.2019.

PURPOSE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING

 

At the Company’s annual meeting, shareholders will vote on the following matters:

 

· 

Proposals1-10: election of directors;

 

· 

Proposal 11: ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors;

 

· 

Proposal 12: advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and

 

· 

Transaction of any other business that properly comes before the meeting. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Company is not aware of any other business to come before the meeting.

There are no rights of appraisal or similar rights of dissenters arising from matters to be acted on at the meeting.

WHO CAN VOTE

 

Only shareholders of record holding shares of Apache common stock at the close of business on the record date, March 26, 2018,25, 2019, are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote the shares of Apache common stock they held on that date. The Company’s stock transfer books will not be closed. A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for examination by any Apache shareholder at 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400, for purposes relating to the annual meeting, during normal business hours for a period of ten days before the meeting.

As of February 28, 2018,2019, there were 382,146,652375,906,962 shares of Apache common stock issued and outstanding. Holders of Apache common stock are entitled to one vote per share and are not allowed to cumulate votes in the election of directors.

HOW TO VOTE

 

If your shares of Apache common stock are held by a broker, bank, or other nominee (in “street name”), you will receive instructions from them on how to vote your shares. If your shares are held by a broker and you do not give the broker specific instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker may vote your shares at its discretion on “routine” matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting. However, your shares will not be voted on any of the“non-routine” matters described below. An absence of voting instructions on any“non-routine” matters will result in a “brokernon-vote.”

The only “routine” matter to be acted upon at the annual meeting is Proposal No. 11: ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors. All other matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting are“non-routine” matters and, as such, if you hold all or any portion of your shares in street name and you do not give your broker or bank specific instructions on how to vote your shares, your shares will not be voted on any of the following“non-routine” matters:

 

· 

Proposals1-10: election of directors; and

 

· 

Proposal 12: advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

If you hold shares of Apache common stock in your own name (as a “shareholder of record”), you may instruct the Company on how to vote your shares:

 

(1)

over the Internetinternet by following the instructions provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials; or

 

(2)

if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by scanning the QR code on the enclosed proxy card with your mobile device (specific directions for using the mobile voting system are shown on the proxy card); or

 

2

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

11


(3)

if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by using the toll-free telephone number listed on the enclosed proxy card (specific directions for using the telephone voting system are included on the proxy card); or

 

(4)

if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by marking, signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.

When using internet, mobile device, or telephone voting, the voting systems will verify that you are a shareholder through the use of a company number for Apache and a unique control number for you.

Whichever method you use to transmit your instructions, your shares of Apache common stock will be voted as you direct. If you designate the proxies named on the proxy card to vote on your behalf, but do not specify how to vote your shares, they will be voted:

 

· 

FORthe election of the nominees for director,

 

· 

FOR the ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors,

 

· 

FOR the advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and

 

· 

In accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxy on any other matter properly brought before the meeting.

If you vote in advance using one of these methods, you may still attend and vote at the meeting. See “Revoking a Proxy” below.

VOTING 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN SHARES

 

If you are an employee or former employee of the Company participating in the Apache 401(k) Savings Plan and have shares of Apache common stock credited to your plan account as of the record date, you will receive printed proxy materials, including a proxy card, in respect of such shares. You have the right to direct the plan trustee regarding how to vote the shares credited to your plan account as of the record date. The trustee for the 401(k) Savings Plan is Fidelity Management Trust Company.

The trustee will vote the shares in your plan account in accordance with your instructions. If you do not send instructions (in the manner described under “How to Vote” above) or if your proxy card is not received by May 21, 2018,20, 2019, the shares credited to your account will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as it votes shares for which it did receive timely instructions.

REVOKING A PROXY

 

You may revoke a proxy before it is voted by submitting a new proxy with a later date by internet, mobile device, telephone, or mail (if applicable), by voting at the meeting, or by filing a written revocation with Apache’s corporate secretary. Your attendance at the annual meeting alone will not automatically revoke your proxy.

QUORUM

 

The presence at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of Apache common stock outstanding on the record date will constitute a quorum, permitting the business of the meeting to be conducted.

VOTES NEEDED

 

Election of Directors

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting is required for the election of directors. You may vote FOR or AGAINST any or all director nominees or you may ABSTAIN as to one or more director nominees. As set forth in our bylaws, only votes FOR or AGAINST the election of a director nominee will be counted. Abstentions and brokernon-votes count for quorum purposes, but not for purposes of the election of directors. A vote to ABSTAIN is not treated as a vote FOR or AGAINST and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

3


Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting is required for ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors. You may vote FOR or AGAINST the ratification of appointment

12

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors or you may ABSTAIN. Votes cast FOR or AGAINST and ABSTENTIONS with respect to this matter will be counted as shares entitled to vote on the matter. Brokernon-votes will also be counted as shares entitled to vote on this matter. A vote to ABSTAIN will have the effect of a vote AGAINST ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers

You may vote FOR or AGAINST the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers or you may ABSTAIN. A majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote must be voted FOR approval of the advisory proposal in order for it to pass. Votes cast FOR or AGAINST and ABSTENTIONS with respect to the proposal will be counted as shares entitled to vote on the proposal. Brokernon-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the proposal. A vote to ABSTAIN will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal.

Other Business

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting is required for approval of any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. Only votes FOR or AGAINST approval of any other business will be counted. Abstentions and brokernon-votes count for quorum purposes, but not for the voting on the approval of such other business.

WHO COUNTS THE VOTES

 

Representatives of EQ Shareowner Services will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of the election.

 

4

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

13


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(PROPOSAL NOS. 1 – 10)

 

The current terms of directors Annell R. Bay, John J. Christmann IV, Chansoo Joung, Rene R. Joyce, George D. Lawrence, John E. Lowe, William C. Montgomery, Amy H. Nelson, Daniel W. Rabun, and Peter A. Ragauss will expire at the annual meeting. Each of Ms. Bay, Mr. Christmann, Mr. Joung, Mr. Joyce, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Lowe, Mr. Montgomery, Ms. Nelson, Mr. Rabun, and Mr. Ragauss has been recommended by the Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and nominated by the Board of Directors for election by the shareholders to an additionalone-year term. In addition, Juliet S. Ellis has been recommended by the Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and nominated by the Board of Directors for election by the Company’s shareholders to aone-year term. If elected, Ms. Bay, Mr. Christmann, Ms. Ellis, Mr. Joung, Mr. Joyce, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Lowe, Mr. Montgomery, Ms. Nelson, Mr. Rabun, and Mr. Ragauss will serve beginning upon their election until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified at the annual meeting of shareholders in 2019.2020.

Charles J. Pitman, who served as a director since 2000, retired from the Company’s Board of Directors effective December 31, 2017. As a result of his retirement, the size of the Board of Directors was reduced to 11 members. On February 8, 2018, Rodman D. Patton, who will reachreached Apache Corporation’s mandatory director retirement age of 75 in June 2018, notified the Company’s Board of Directors of his intention not to stand forre-election to the Board at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in May 2018. On February 4, 2019, George D. Lawrence, who served as a director since 1996, notified the Company’s Board of Directors of his intention not to stand forre-election to the Board at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in May 2019.

Unless otherwise instructed, all proxies will be voted in favor of these nominees. If one or more of the nominees is unwilling or unable to serve, the proxies will be voted only for the remaining named nominees. Proxies cannot be voted for more than ten nominees. The Board of Directors knows of no nominee for director who is unwilling or unable to serve.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES AS DIRECTORS.

 

 

14

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

5


Nominees for Election as Directors

Biographical information as of December 31, 2017,April 9, 2019, including principal occupation and business experience during the last five years, of each nominee for director, is set forth below. Unless otherwise stated, the principal occupation of each nominee has been the same for the past five years. In addition, each nominee’s experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills to serve on our Board are set forth below.

ANNELLAnnell R. BAYBay

 

LOGO

  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Ms. Bay, 62,63, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in May 2014. She chairs the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and is a member of the Management Development and Compensation Committee.

 

Experience:

From July 2011 to April 2014, Ms. Bay served as vice president, Global Exploration, of Marathon Oil Corporation, having previously held the position of senior vice president, Exploration, since June 2008.

From August 2004, priorPrior to joining Marathon, Ms. Bay served as vice president, Americas Exploration of Shell Exploration and Production Company.Company from 2004-2008.

Prior to joining Shell, Ms. Bay was vice president, Worldwide Exploration, and vice president, North America Exploration, of Kerr-McGee Oil and Gas Corporation, having been with Oryx Energy prior to its merger with Kerr-McGee.

Ms. Bay serves as a director of Hunting PLC, a London-based energy service provider, and Verisk Analytics, Inc., a global data analytics provider. She also serves on the advisory boards for the Jackson School of Geosciences at the University of Texas at Austin and the Independent Petroleum Association of America Energy Education Center.

Skills and qualifications:

With her extensive executive experience in the oil and gas industry, and as a result of her service on the advisory boards of educational and industry organizations, Ms. Bay brings to the boardBoard a wealth of oil and gas exploration and operations, civic, and educational experience.

As a member of public company boards in two countries having significantly different governance regulatory regimes, Ms. Bay also brings unique governance skills and experience to the board.Board. She is a highly regarded speaker at major governance events on both sides of the Atlantic. She has hosted individual and small group meetings with large and environmental-, social- and governance- (ESG) focused shareholders. As chair of the CG&N Committee, she has overseen the updating of the Company’s governance principles and the adoption of a committee calendar formalizing oversight of key ESG subjects.

 

6

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

15


JOHNJohn J. CHRISTMANNChristmann IV

 

LOGO

LOGO
  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Mr. Christmann, 51,52, was appointed the Company’s chief executive officer and president, and joined the Company’s Board of Directors effective January 20, 2015.

 

Experience:

Mr. Christmann previously served as the Company’s executive vice president and chief operating officer, North America, since January 2014.

From January 2010 through December 2013, he served as region vice president, Permian Region. From January 2004 through December 2009, he served as vice president, Business Development, and from April through December 2003, he served as production manager for the Gulf Coast Region. Prior to that, Mr. Christmann held various positions of increasing responsibility in the business development area since joining the Company in 1997.

Previously, Mr. Christmann was employed by Vastar Resources/ARCO Oil and Gas Company in business development, crude oil marketing, and various production, operational, and reservoir engineering assignments.

Mr. Christmann received his bachelor’s degree in petroleum engineering from the Colorado School of Mines and Master of Business Administration from Southern Methodist University.

Skills and qualifications:

With over 30 years in the oil and gas industry, including over 2021 years at the Company leading both operational and staff functions and most recently serving as chief executive officer, Mr. Christmann has the proficiency and depth to manage and operate a large-scale oil and gas exploration and production company.

Mr. Christmann’s extensive experience in the oil and gas industry has provided him with anin-depth understanding of successful execution and operational management in the field, an appreciation and talent for value-added merger and acquisition activity, and the expertise to oversee the strategic direction of a large, publicly traded company.

His experience, coupled with his thorough knowledge and understanding of the Company’s assets and unique operations, complement Mr. Christmann’s management strengths and enable him to lead the Company through the complexities ofday-to-day operations as well as the macro economicmacro-economic impact of commodity prices.

Juliet S. Ellis

LOGO

Experience:

Ms. Ellis, 59, served as a managing director and senior portfolio manager for Invesco Ltd. (Invesco) and as the chief investment officer for Invesco’s US Growth Equities Investment Management Unit until her retirement in March 2019. Ms. Ellis previously served as the chief investment officer for Invesco’s Small Cap Growth Fund and Small Cap Equity Fund between 2004 and 2017.

Prior to joining Invesco in 2004, Ms. Ellis was employed by JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPMorgan), including its predecessor, Fleming Asset Management, where she held increasingly senior positions, starting from an equity analyst position in 1987 to a senior portfolio manager in 1993 and a managing director in 2000, where she served as senior portfolio manager of JPMorgan's small-cap equity and small-cap growth strategies. She began her investment career in 1981 with Merrill Lynch.

Ms. Ellis has been a member of the board of directors for Donnelley Financial Solutions, Inc. since 2018 and serves on its audit committee.

Skills and qualifications:

Ms. Ellis brings a variety of financial and executive experiences and perspectives to the Board. Her extensive experience in portfolio management, strategy, and risk oversight, along with her institutional-investor perspective, will enhance her contributions to the Board.

 

16

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

7


CHANSOO JOUNGChansoo Joung

 

LOGO

  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Mr. Joung, 57,58, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in February 2011. He chairs the Audit Committee and is a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

 

Experience:

From 2005 to 2015, Mr. Joung was a partner and then senior advisor at Warburg Pincus LLC. He was responsible for making and monitoring investments in all sectors of the energy industry, including upstream, gas and gas liquids processing and transportation, and electric power. He was also responsible for global coordination of the firm’s renewables activities, including wind, solar, biofuels, and grid storage.

From 1987 to 2004, Mr. Joung was employed by Goldman Sachs & Co. where he held increasingly senior positions, culminating his17-year career as head of the Americas Natural Resources Group in the investment banking division. His other leadership responsibilities in the investment banking division included stints asco-head of recruiting andco-head of women’s and diversity recruitment and development.

Prior to joining Apache’s board,Board, Mr. Joung served as a director on two other NYSE-listed company boards: Targa Resources Partners LP from 2007 to 2011, and Targa Resources Corporation from 2010 to 2011. He also served as a director on a number of private company boards during his tenure at Warburg Pincus.

Currently, Mr. Joung is an advisory director on the advisory board of TPH Asset Management LLC, an affiliate of Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co.

Skills and qualifications:

Mr. Joung has spent almost his entire career in the finance industry working with energy companies. Through his experiences in private equity and as an investment banker, Mr. Joung gained significant experience with energy companies, the energy industry, and energy-related capital markets and mergers and acquisitions activity, which enhance his contributions to the Board. Those experiences have also given Mr. Joung the ability to identify, assess, and manage risk that can affect a large energy company like Apache.

RENERene R. JOYCEJoyce

 

LOGO  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Mr. Joyce, 70,71, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in May 2017. He is a member of the Management Development and Compensation Committee.

 

Experience:

He currently serves as a director of midstream company Targa Resources Corporation (Targa Resources). Mr. Joyce previously served as executive chairman of the board of Targa Resources between 2012 and 2014 and as chief executive officer of Targa Resources between 2005 and 2011. Mr. Joyce also served as a member of the supervisory directors of Core Laboratories N.V. (Core Labs) from 2000 until May 2013.

In addition to his leadership roles with Targa Resources, several of its subsidiaries, and Core Labs, Mr. Joyce previously served as president of onshore pipeline operations of Coral Energy, LLC, a subsidiary of Shell Oil Company;Company, and as president of energy services of Coral Energy Holding, LP, also a subsidiary of Shell and the gas and power marketing joint venture between Shell and Tejas Gas Corporation, a natural gas pipeline company.

Prior to Shell’s acquisition of Tejas in 1998, he served as president of various operating subsidiaries of Tejas. Mr. Joyce holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Louisiana State University and a law degree from Loyola University.

Skills and qualifications:

As a current director and former executive chairman and chief executive officer of Targa Resources, Mr. Joyce has gained extensive experience in the midstream sector of the oil and gas business. Given the corporation’s focus on midstream processing and takeaway capacity for its recent discovery at Alpine High, Mr. Joyce brings much needed midstream experience to the board.Board. Mr. Joyce’s understanding of this important area of focus for the corporationCompany enhances his contributions to the board.Board.

 

8

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

17


GEORGE D. LAWRENCE

LOGO

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Mr. Lawrence, 67, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in May 1996. He is a member of the Audit Committee.

Experience:

From 1990 until May 1996, Mr. Lawrence was president, chief executive officer, and a director of The Phoenix Resource Companies, Inc., an international publicly-owned oil and gas company that merged with Apache in 1996.

In 1985, Mr. Lawrence began his oil and gas career with the predecessor to Phoenix, holding management positions with increasing responsibility, culminating in his appointment as president and chief executive officer and his service as a director until the Phoenix and Apache merger.

Since retiring from Phoenix, Mr. Lawrence has been a private investor.

Prior to entering the oil and gas business, Mr. Lawrence served in the Environmental Enforcement Section of the United States Department of Justice, his last position there being assistant chief.

Skills and qualifications:

During his tenure as president and chief executive officer of Phoenix, Mr. Lawrence gained valuable corporate leadership experience in all aspects of business, including finance, securities, operations, strategy and risk.

At Phoenix and its predecessor, Mr. Lawrence was extensively involved in international operations spread over several continents, and he was especially instrumental in leading Phoenix’s operations in Egypt, an area that remains important to Apache’s operations.

His dedication to environmental responsibility stemming from his service in the Department of Justice Environmental Enforcement Section continues to this day.

JOHNJohn E. LOWELowe

 

LOGO  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Mr. Lowe, 58,60, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in July 2013 and becamenon-executive chairman as of May 2, 2015.

 

Experience:

Mr. Lowe enjoyed a30-year career with ConocoPhillips and Phillips Petroleum Company, serving in positions of increasing responsibility during that time. Most recently, he served as assistant to the chief executive officer of ConocoPhillips, a position he held from 2008 until Phillips 66 wasspun-off from ConocoPhillips in 2012.

Previously, Mr. Lowe held a series of executive positions in the exploration and production, commercial, and planning areas of ConocoPhillips, including executive vice president, exploration and production from 2007 to 2008; executive vice president, Commercial from 2006 to 2007; and executive vice president, planning, strategy, and corporate affairs from 2002 to 2006, as a part of which his responsibilities included government relations, public affairs, and corporate technology.

Mr. Lowe is a member of the board of directors for Phillips 66, Houston, Texas, and TransCanada Corporation, Calgary, Alberta. He is a senior executive advisor to Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. He is a former board member of Agrium Inc., Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. LLC, DCP Midstream LLC, and DCP Midstream GP LLC, the general partner of DCP Midstream Partners LP.

Skills and qualifications:

With over 30 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, and as an executive of ConocoPhillips, a director of Phillips 66, a director of TransCanada, a senior executive advisor to Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co., and a former director of Agrium, Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. LLC, DCP Midstream LLC, and DCP Midstream GP, Mr. Lowe brings valuable experience to the board,Board, including experience identifying, assessing, and minimizing risks faced by oil and gas companies.

18

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


WILLIAMWilliam C. MONTGOMERYMontgomery

 

LOGO  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Mr. Montgomery, 56,57, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in September 2011. He chairs the Management Development and Compensation Committee and is a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

 

Experience:

From October 2002 to April 2011, Mr. Montgomery was a partner in the investment banking division of Goldman, Sachs & Co., where he headed the firm’s Americas Natural Resources Group as well as its Houston office and was a member of the Investment Banking Services Leadership Group. Over the span of 22 years as an investment banker, Mr. Montgomery focused globally on large caplarge-cap energy companies, primarily in the upstream, integrated, and oil service sectors.

Since July 2011, Mr. Montgomery has served as a partner of Quantum Energy Partners, a private equity firm that focuses on investments in the energy and power industries. He is a member of Quantum Energy’s executive and investment committees. In October 2015, Mr. Montgomery was elected a director of Enterprise Products Holdings LLC, the general partner of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., and serves on its audit and conflicts committee.

Mr. Montgomery has been an active civic leader, chairing the boards of the Houston Museum of Natural Science and the St. Francis Episcopal Day School. He currently serves on the board of trustees of theThe Kinkaid School, the Episcopal Health Foundation, and the boardBoard of visitorsVisitors of the MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Skills and qualifications:

Mr. Montgomery has spent almost his entire career working in the finance industry focusing onlarge-cap energy companies. Formerly as an investment banker and now in private equity, Mr. Montgomery has gained significant experience with the energy industry and energy-related capital markets. The Companycompany also benefits from the extensive relationships that Mr. Montgomery has formed throughout his career serving various global energy companies. Mr. Montgomery’s contributions to the Board are aided by the knowledge and experience he gained from his current and former roles, which have involved broad and deep exposure to key issues impacting the upstream, midstream, and oil services sectors.

AMY

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

9


Amy H. NELSONNelson

 

LOGO

  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Ms. Nelson, 48,50, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in February 2014. She is a member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

 

Experience:

Ms. Nelson is the president of Greenridge Advisors, LLC, which she founded in 2007 as an energy services and equipment consulting firm focused on the development, execution, and financing of growth strategies. Ms. Nelson advises her clients on strategy development, capital allocation, acquisition evaluation, and infrastructure development. Her clients span a broad range of oilfield service, product, and geographic markets.

From 2000 to 2007, Ms. Nelson served as a vice president of SCF Partners, an oilfield service and equipment-focused private equity firm, where she concentrated on investment strategy, investment execution, and portfolio company management.

She has also served on several private company boards during her tenure at SCF Partners and Greenridge Advisors. Since 2018, Ms. Nelson has served on the NACD TriCities Chapter Board of Directors.

From 1992 to 1998, Ms. Nelson worked for Amoco Production Company in planning, project management, and engineering roles.

Skills and qualifications:

Ms. Nelson has devoted her career to serving companies in the oil and gas industry. Ms. Nelson’s experiences have provided her with valuable insight into corporate strategy, capital allocation, and the assessment and management of risks faced by oil and gas companies.

Over the past decade, Ms. Nelson has also developed substantial water-related expertise in unconventional field development water cycle, including treatment technologies, water delivery and take-away temporary and permanent infrastructure, frac-water sources, containment and salt water disposal, management of access rights to ground, surface, industrial, and municipal water sources, and management of regulatory and compliance issues. Ms. Nelson’s understanding of this important environmental subject enhances her contributions to the board.Board.

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

19


DANIELDaniel W. RABUNRabun

 

LOGO  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Mr. Rabun, 63,64, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in May 2015. He is a member of the Management Development and Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

 

Experience:

From 2007 to his retirement in May 2015, Mr. Rabun served as the chairman of Ensco plc, an offshore drilling services company, based in London. He retired as president and chief executive officer of Ensco in June 2014, having held the office of chief executive officer for more than seven years and president for more than eight years.

From 1986 through 2005, prior to joining Ensco, Mr. Rabun was a partner with the international law firm of Baker & McKenzie LLP, where he provided legal advice to oil and gas companies.

Mr. Rabun is anon-executive director of Golar LNG Ltd. and the Chairman of the Board of Apergy Corporation. During 2012, he served as chairman of the International Association of Drilling Contractors. Mr. Rabun has also been a certified public accountant since 1976.

Skills and qualifications:

Mr. Rabun brings a variety of experiences to our board,Board, including service as chairman of the board, president, and chief executive officer of Ensco. During Mr. Rabun’s term at Ensco, Ensco drilled some of the most complex wells for super majors, national oil companies, and independent operators in nearly every strategic oil and gas area in the world, from the North Sea to the “golden triangle” of the Gulf of Mexico, Brazil, and West Africa, and from the Middle East and the Mediterranean to Asia and Australia. In addition, Mr. Rabun’s experience as anon-executive director of Golar LNG Ltd. gives him invaluable insight into the global liquid natural gas business, which will be beneficial to the corporation in its efforts to market natural gas from the Alpine High discovery in the Delaware Basin. In addition, Mr. Rabun’s experience as chairman of the board of Apergy Corporation gives him good insight into new technologies used to drill and produce oil and gas.

Mr. Rabun’s international experience, global perspective, experience with strategic acquisitions, and financial acumen from having served as a public company’s chairman, president and chief executive officer assist the Board in the assessment and management of risks faced by oil and gas companies.

PETER

10

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


Peter A. RAGAUSSRagauss

 

LOGO  

Board tenure and responsibilities:

Mr. Ragauss, 60,61, joined the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2014. He is a member of the Audit Committee.

 

Experience:

In November 2014, Mr. Ragauss retired from Baker Hughes after serving eight years as senior vice president and chief financial officer.

From 2003 to 2006, prior to joining Baker Hughes, Mr. Ragauss was controller, Refining and Marketing, for BP p.l.c. From 2000 to 2003, he was chief executive officer for Air BP. From 1998 to 2000, he was assistant to group chief executive for BP Amoco. He was vice president of Finance and Portfolio Management for Amoco Energy International when Amoco Corporation merged with BP.

From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Ragauss served as vice president of Finance for El Paso Energy International. He held positions of increasing responsibility at Tenneco Inc. from 1993 to 1996, and Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated from 1987 to 1993.

Mr. Ragauss was elected a director of The Williams Companies, Inc. in September 2016.

Skills and qualifications:

Mr. Ragauss brings a wealth of accounting, financial, and executive experience to the board,Board, having held senior positions, including as chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and vice president finance. His wide and varied experiences in the oil and gas industry, including in the area of finance, have provided him with a unique understanding and insight concerning the risks faced by oil and gas companies.

 

20

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

11


Director Independence

During 20172018 and the first two months of 2018,2019, the Board of Directors evaluated all business and charitable relationships between the Company and the Company’snon-employee directors (all directors other than Mr. Christmann) and all other relevant facts and circumstances. As a result of the evaluation, the Board of Directors determined, as required by the Company’s Governance Principles, that eachnon-employee director is an independent director as defined by the standards for director independence established by applicable laws, rules, and listing standards including, without limitation, the standards for independent directors established by The New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), The NASDAQ National Market (“NASDAQ”), and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company’s Governance Principles are available on the Company’s website (www.apachecorp.com).

The Company’s Governance Principles require that the independent directors meet in executive session at least twice each year; in 2017,2018, they met five times in executive session. These executive sessions are chaired by anon-executive chairman or a lead director. Pursuant to the Company’s Governance Principles, thenon-executive chairman or lead director is an independent director who is elected from time to time, but not less than annually, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the independent directors. In addition to chairing the executive sessions, thenon-executive chairman or lead director discusses management’s proposed meeting agenda with the other independent directors and reviews the approved meeting agenda with our chief executive officer, leads the discussion with our chief executive officer following the independent directors’ executive sessions, ensures that the Board’s individual group and committee self-assessments are done annually, leads periodic discussions with other Board members and management concerning the Board’s information needs, and is available for discussions with major shareholders. John E. Lowe has served as the Company’snon-executive chairman since May 2015. The role and responsibilities of thenon-executive chairman or lead director and the method established for communication of concerns to the independent directors are included in the Company’s Governance Principles.

Reporting of Concerns to Independent Directors

Anyone who has concerns about the Company may communicate those concerns to the independent directors. Such communication should be mailed to the Company’s corporate secretary at 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400, and the corporate secretary will forward such communications to the independent directors.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

Board Leadership Structure

At different times in the Company’s history the positions of chair and chief executive officer have been split or combined as circumstances have warranted. Consistent with good governance practices, the Company took the opportunity presented by the retirement of our former chief executive officer and president to create a position for an independentnon-executive chairman. Independent director John E. Lowe was appointednon-executive chairman effective May 2, 2015. The boardBoard regularly reviews all aspects of its governance profile, including the Board leadership structure, and will make changes as appropriate.

Risk Oversight

The goal of the Company’s risk management process is to understand and manage risk; management is responsible for identifying and managing the risks, while directors provide oversight to management in this process. Management identifies the significant risks facing the Company and the approaches to mitigate such risks. The Company’s Governance Principles state that in addition to its general oversight of management, the Board of Directors is responsible for a number of specific functions, including assessing major risks facing the Company and reviewing options for their mitigation.

Our Board of Directors has three standing independent committees: Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Management Development and Compensation. Our Audit Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial risk management processes on behalf of the Board. The Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee should review and discuss with management (and, if appropriate, the Auditor) risks related to financial matters, including, but not limited to, credit ratings, derivatives and hedging strategies, counterparties to financial instruments, debt, leases, and other balance sheet items and financial risks. In addition, the Audit Committee reports to the Board of Directors, which also considers the Company’s entire risk profile. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors obtain input from management regarding the most significant risks facing the Company and the Company’s risk management strategy including financial, operational, and cybersecurity risks.

The Audit Committee and the Board endeavor to ensure that the risks undertaken are consistent with the Board’s tolerance for risk. While the Board is responsible for setting, monitoring, and maintaining the Company’s risk management

 

12

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

21


policies and practices, the Company’s executive officers and members of our management team are responsible for implementing and overseeing ourday-to-day risk management processes. Additionally, the Board has created a Corporate Risk Management Committee composed of certain members of our management team. The Corporate Risk Management Committee monitors and manages risks and is tasked with, among other things, ensuring sound policies, procedures, and practices are in place to address corporate-wide management of risks including financial, operational, and cybersecurity risks. The Company believes that this division of responsibility is the most effective way to monitor and control risk.

In addition to the oversight provided by our full Board of Directors, Audit Committee, executive officers and the members of our management team, including our Corporate Risk Management Committee, our independent directors hold regularly scheduled executive sessions as often as they deem appropriate, but in any event at least twice each year. These executive sessions provide an additional avenue through which we monitor the Company’s risk exposure and policies regarding risk management.

For risk considerations in our compensation programs, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Programs” included in this proxy statement.

Standing Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Corporate Governance and Nominating (“CG&N”) Committee, and a Management Development and Compensation (“MD&C”) Committee. Actions taken by these committees are reported to the Board of Directors at the next Board meeting. During 2017,2018, each of the Company’s continuing directors attended at least 75 percent of all meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of which he or she was a member. All directors attended the Company’s 20172018 annual meeting of shareholders held on May 11, 2017.24, 2018.

 

Name             Board                 Audit                 CG&N                 MD&C                   Board                 Audit                 CG&N                 MD&C      

Annell R. Bay

 LOGO           LOGO          LOGO            

 

 

 

LOGO        

 

 

  

 

LOGO        

 

 

 

LOGO          

 

John J. Christmann IV

 LOGO             

 

LOGO        

 

   

Chansoo Joung

 LOGO          LOGO         LOGO           

 

LOGO        

 

 

 

LOGO       

 

 

 

LOGO        

 

 

Rene R. Joyce

 LOGO            LOGO            

 

LOGO        

 

   

 

LOGO          

 

George D. Lawrence

 LOGO          LOGO          

George D. Lawrence*

 

 

LOGO        

 

 

 

LOGO       

 

  

John E. Lowe

 LOGO             

 

LOGO        

 

   

William C. Montgomery

 LOGO           LOGO          LOGO            

 

LOGO        

 

   

 

LOGO          

 

Amy H. Nelson

 LOGO          LOGO           

 

LOGO        

 

 

 

LOGO       

 

 

 

LOGO        

 

 

Daniel W. Rabun

 LOGO            LOGO            

 

LOGO        

 

  

 

LOGO        

 

 

 

LOGO          

 

Peter A. Ragauss

 LOGO          LOGO          

 

 

LOGO        

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOGO       

 

 

 

 

No. of Meetings in 2017

 10         9        6         5          

No. of Meetings in 2018

 

 

 

6       

 

 

 

 

 

 

9      

 

 

 

 

 

 

8       

 

 

 

 

 

 

6         

 

 

 

LOGO Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board

LOGO Committee Chairman

*

On February 4, 2019, Mr. Lawrence notified the Board of his intention not to stand forre-election at the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders, which would mark the expiration of his current term as a director of the Company.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to (i) the integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, accounting and financial reporting processes, and systems of internal controls over accounting and financial reporting; (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence, and performance, including sole authority for appointment, compensation, oversight, evaluation, and termination; (iv) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function; (v) the report of the Audit Committee required by the rules of the SEC, as included in this proxy statement; and (vi) the fulfillment of the other responsibilities set out in its charter. The Audit Committee charter, as adopted by the Board of Directors and which reflects applicable SEC, NYSE, and NASDAQ rules and regulations, is available on the Company’s website (www.apachecorp.com).

 

22

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

13


As described more fully above in “Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight,” the Audit Committee is also tasked with overseeing the guidelines, policies, and controls governing the process by which management of the Company assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to risk.

The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit Committee qualify as financial experts, as defined in Item 407 of RegulationS-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and each are considered “financially literate” under NYSE rules. During 20172018 and the first two months of 2018,2019, the Board of Directors reviewed the composition of the Audit Committee pursuant to the rules of the SEC, NYSE, and NASDAQ governing audit committees. Based on this review, the Board of Directors confirmed that all members of the Audit Committee are “independent” under the SEC, NYSE, and NASDAQ rules.

CG&N Committee

The duties of the CG&N Committee include recommending to the Board of Directors the slate of director nominees submitted to the shareholders for election at each annual meeting and proposing qualified candidates to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors. The CG&N Committee is also responsible for developing corporate governance principles for the Company, reviewing related party transactions, and overseeing the evaluation of the Board of Directors. During 20172018 and the first two months of 2018,2019, the Board of Directors reviewed the composition of the CG&N Committee pursuant to the rules of the NYSE and NASDAQ governing nominating and governance committees. Based on this review, the Board of Directors confirmed that all members of the CG&N Committee are “independent” under the NYSE and NASDAQ rules. The CG&N Committee charter, as adopted by the Board of Directors, is available on the Company’s website (www.apachecorp.com).

The CG&N Committee considers director nominee recommendations from executive officers of the Company, independent members of the Board, and shareholders of the Company, as well as recommendations from other interested parties. The CG&N Committee may also retain an outside search firm to assist it in finding appropriate nominee candidates. Shareholder recommendations for director nominees received by Apache’s corporate secretary (at the address for submitting shareholder proposals and nominations set forth under the heading “Future Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations” below) are forwarded to the CG&N Committee for consideration.

MD&C Committee

The MD&C Committee reviews the Company’s management resources and structure and administers the Company’s compensation programs and retirement, stock purchase, and similar plans. During 20172018 and the first two months of 2018,2019, the Board of Directors reviewed the composition of the MD&C Committee pursuant to the rules of the NYSE and NASDAQ governing compensation committees. Based on this review, the Board of Directors confirmed that all members of the MD&C Committee are “independent” under the NYSE and NASDAQ rules. All members of the Committee are also “outside directors,” as defined by applicable federal tax law or regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. The MD&C Committee charter, as adopted by the Board of Directors, is available on the Company’s website (www.apachecorp.com).

Committee Charters

You can access electronic copies of the charters of the Audit Committee, CG&N Committee, and MD&C Committee of the Board of Directors on the Company’s website (www.apachecorp.com). Our Governance Principles and our Code of Business Conduct, which meet the requirements of a code of ethics under applicable SEC regulations and NYSE and NASDAQ standards, each document as amended from time to time, are also available on the Company’s website. You may request printed copies of any of these documents by writing to Apache’s corporate secretary at 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400.

Board and Committee Evaluations

Our Board of Directors recognize that a thorough evaluation process is an important element of corporate governance and enhances our Board’s effectiveness. Therefore, each year, the independentnon-executive chairman of the Board oversees the evaluation process to ensure that the full Board and each committee conduct an assessment of their performance and solicit feedback for areas of improvement. With respect to the full Board, our chairman interviews each Board member individually in a wide ranging interview to solicit Board performance feedback. In turn, the chairwoman of the CG&N Committee interviews each Board member to solicit feedback on thenon-executive chairman’s performance. Each committee also conducts a thorough annual self-evaluation through the use of a written questionnaire.in each committee’s executive session. These evaluations are then reviewed and shared with the full boardBoard during the Board’s executive session.

In 2019, the Board also engaged the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”), which administered an independent board evaluation through individual interviews with each director and an online survey completed by each director. After discussion with the independent non-executive chairman and the chairwoman of the CG&N Committee, NACD facilitated a discussion of the results with the full Board.

 

14

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

23


Criteria for New Board Members andRe-Election of Board Members

The CG&N Committee considers the following criteria in recommending new nominees or there-election of directors to the Company’s Board of Directors and its committees:

 

 · 

Expertise and perspective needed to govern the business and strengthen and support senior management; for example: strong financial expertise, knowledge of international operations, or knowledge of the petroleum industry and/or related industries.

 

 · 

Sound business judgment and a sufficiently broad perspective to make meaningful contributions.

 

 · 

Interest and enthusiasm in the Company and a commitment to become involved in its future.

 

 · 

The time and energy to meet Board of Directors commitments.

 

 · 

Ability to constructively participate in discussions, with the capacity to quickly understand and evaluate complex and diverse issues.

 

 · 

Dedication to the highest ethical standards.

 

 · 

Dedication to the highest health, safety, and environmental standards.

 

 · 

Supportive of management, but independent, objective, and willing to question and challenge both openly and in private exchanges.

 

 · 

An awareness of the dynamics of change and a willingness to anticipate and explore opportunities.

All decisions to recommend the nomination of a new nominee for election to the Board of Directors or for there-election of a director are within the sole discretion of the CG&N Committee.

The above criteria and guidelines, together with the section of the Company’s Governance Principles entitled “Qualifications of Board Members,” constitute the policy of the CG&N Committee regarding the recommendation of new nominees or there-election of directors to the Company’s Board of Directors or its committees. The Company’s Governance Principles are available on the Company’s website (www.apachecorp.com).

Diversity

Company policy precludes directors and employees from discriminating against any protected group. As such, all director candidates are evaluated, and the decision of whether or not to nominate a particular candidate is made, based solely on Company- and work-related factors and not with regard to a candidate’s or director’s inclusion in any protected class or group identified in the Company’s anti-discrimination policy. The Company’s approach to Board diversity complements this policy without conflicting with it.as we believe that Board diversity in all its aspects is essential to our business. We believe that Board diversity in all its aspects is essential to our business. Our criteria for Board selection, summarized above, operates as our diversity policy.

 

24

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

15


Report of the Audit Committee

The following report of the Audit Committee of the Company shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall this report be incorporated by reference into any filing made by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The Audit Committee is operated under a charter that specifies the scope of the Committee’s responsibilities. The charter, which is reviewed annually and available on the Company’s website (www.apachecorp.com), was last amended and restated effective May 11, 2017.24, 2018.

The Board of Directors has determined that all fivefour members of the Committee are independent based upon the standards adopted by the Board, which incorporate the independence requirements under applicable laws, rules, and regulations, including the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ National Market and Rule10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The Company’s management has the primary responsibility for preparing the Company’s financial statements, managing the accounting and financial reporting processes, devising and maintaining the systems of internal controls over financial reporting, and assessing the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP, Apache’s independent registered public accounting firm (the “independent auditors”), is responsible for the integrated audit of the consolidated financial statements and auditing the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and procedures on behalf of the Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal year 2017,2018, including the fourfivein-person meetings referenced below. The meetings of the Audit Committee are designed to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, the Company, the Company’s internal audit function, and the Company’s independent auditors. Meeting agendas are set based upon the Audit Committee Charter and also include suggested topics from Committee members and/or other relevant topics. At four of the fourfive Audit Committee meetings held in person during 2017,2018, the Committee met with the internal auditors and the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, including internal controls over financial reporting, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

The Committee is responsible for oversight of the qualifications, performance, and independence of the Company’s independent auditors and annually determines whether to retain the Company’s current independent auditors or retain another auditor. In doing so, the Audit Committee takes into consideration a number of factors, including the historical and recent performance of the independent auditors and lead partner, its global capabilities, its knowledge of the Company’s operations and industry, external data relating to audit quality and performance, including recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) reports, and independence. The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Company’s independent auditors, in both fact and appearance.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and the independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, its judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by the standards of the PCAOB, including PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301,Communications With Audit Committees, the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other applicable regulations. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the firm’s independence from Company management and the Company, including the matters in the letter from the firm required by PCAOB Rule 3526,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and considered the compatibility ofnon-audit services with the independent auditors’ independence.

The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed together with management, the internal auditors, and the independent auditors the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, including the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements, the results of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, and the internal and independent auditors’ auditaudits of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

16

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

25


In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting be included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

February 20, 201826, 2019

  Members of the Audit Committee
  

Chansoo Joung, Chairman

George D. Lawrence

Amy H. Nelson

Rodman D. Patton

Peter A. Ragauss

 

26

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

17


Director Compensation

Summary of 20172018 Director Compensation

Under the terms of the Company’sNon-Employee Directors’ Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on July 13, 2017 (the “Directors’ Compensation Plan”), and the Company’sNon-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Units Program (the “RSU Program”), eachnon-employee director receives an annual retainer, paidone-third in cash andtwo-thirds in stock.

The equity component of the annual boardBoard retainer for the Company’snon-employee directors is not paid out until thenon-employee director retires or otherwise leaves the Board of Directors.

The retirement plan for the Company’snon-employee directors limits participation to those members first elected to the Board of Directors on or before June 30, 2014.

Non-Employee Directors’ Cash Compensation

During 2017,2018, under the terms of the Directors’ Compensation Plan, eachnon-employee director received an annual cash retainer of $100,000 for service on the Board of Directors, thenon-executive chairman of the Board received an additional annual cash retainer of $100,000, and the chair of each committee and members of the Audit Committee (beginning third quarter 2017) received an additional cash retainer. There were no separate meeting attendance fees.

Under the terms of the Directors’ Compensation Plan,non-employee directors can defer receipt of all or any portion of their cash retainers. Deferred cash amounts accrue interest equal to the Company’s rate of return on its short-term marketable securities. Once each year, participating directors may elect to transfer all or a portion of their deferred cash amounts into the form of shares of Apache common stock. After such election, amounts deferred in the form of Apache common stock accrue dividends as if the stock were issued and outstanding when such dividends were payable. All deferred amounts, as well as accrued interest and dividends, are maintained in a separate memorandum account for each participatingnon-employee director. Amounts are paid out in cash and/or shares of Apache common stock, as applicable, upon thenon-employee director’s retirement or other termination of his or her directorship, or on a specific date, in a lump sum or in annual installments over aten-year (or shorter) period.

Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Units Program

During 2017,2018, pursuant to the RSU Program, allnon-employee directors were eligible to receive grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) at the end of each calendar quarter, with the number of RSUs calculated by dividing $50,000 by the fair market value of a share of Apache common stock on the date of grant, rounded down to the nearest whole number. Pursuant to the RSU Program, the Company’snon-executive chairman of the Board was also eligible to receive additional grants of RSUs at the end of each calendar quarter, with the number of RSUs calculated by dividing $25,000 by the fair market value of a share of Apache common stock on the date of grant, rounded down to the nearest whole number.

Grants under the RSU Program were made pursuant to the Company’s 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan.

Each RSU is equivalent to one share of Apache common stock. If applicable, the grant is prorated for thenon-employee director’s ornon-executive chairman’s service during the calendar quarter.

The RSUs vest as of the grant date, with 100 percent automatic, mandatory deferral into the Outside Directors’ Deferral Program (the “Deferral Program”) established pursuant to the Company’s 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan. Deferrals are invested in stock units with each stock unit being equivalent to one share of Apache common stock. Stock units accrue dividends as if the stock was issued and outstanding when such dividends were payable, and all dividend amounts are invested in additional stock units. All stock units are maintained in a separate memorandum account for eachnon-employee director. Stock units in the Deferral Program will be converted to shares of Apache common stock and paid out upon thenon-employee director’s retirement or other termination of his or her directorship.

Annual Review of Director Compensation

In our annual review of director compensation, the benchmarking analysis provided to the Board for 20172018 indicated that the average director compensation was just above the 25th percentile of our Compensation Peer Group (as defined in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section) at that time.

Director Share Ownership Requirement

The Company has a minimum share ownership requirement fornon-employee directors that requires eachnon-employee director to directly own shares and/or share equivalents the total value of which is equal to or greater than six times the

 

18

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

27


annual Board retainer paid in cash, excluding additional retainers for service as a committee chair or asnon-executive chairman. Based on an annual Board cash retainer of $100,000, eachnon-employee director is required to own shares and/or share equivalents the total value of which is at least $600,000 based on the value as of the acquisition date.

Non-employee directors must meet the ownership requirement within three years of the later of (i) July 16, 2014 or (ii) the date of his or her appointment to the Board of Directors. Once achieved, eachnon-employee director must continue to meet the minimum share ownership requirement for the duration of his or her service on the Board. As of February 28, 2018,2019, eachnon-employee director, other than Mr. RabunJoyce, directly owned shares of the Company’s common stock and/or share equivalents with total value equal to or greater than $600,000 (six times the annual cash boardBoard retainer). Mr. RabunJoyce has until May 13, 2018,2020 to meet the requirement. See beneficial ownership information under the heading “Securities Ownership and Principal Holders” below.

Pledging and Hedging Policies

The Company has a pledging policy that prohibitsnon-employee directors and executive officers from holding Apache securities in a margin account or pledging any Apache securities as collateral for a loan. The Company also has a hedging policy that prohibitsnon-employee directors and executive officers from entering into any hedge, or other transaction (such as puts, calls, options, or other derivative securities) in Apache securities that has the effect of limiting the risk of ownership of Apache common stock or stock options. As of the date of this proxy statement, eachnon-employee director was in compliance with the Company’s pledging and hedging policies.

Outside Directors’ Retirement Plan

An unfunded retirement plan fornon-employee directors was established in December 1992. The Outside Directors’ Retirement Plan was most recently amended on July 16, 2014, effective as of June 30, 2014, to (i) limit participation to those members first elected to the Board of Directors on or before June 30, 2014 and (ii) specify that the amount of benefits will be determined as of the earlier of the date thenon-employee director ceases to be a member of the Board of Directors or June 30, 2014, at which date the annual cash Board retainer was $150,000.

The plan is administered by the MD&C Committee and generally pays an annual benefit equal to 100 percent of the retired director’s annual cash Board retainer for a period based on length of service. Payments are made either (i) on a quarterly basis, for a maximum of ten years, or (ii) in a single lump sum equal to the net present value of the quarterly payments to which the director is entitled, and are paid from the general assets of the Company. In the event of the director’s death prior to receipt of all benefits payable under the plan, the remaining benefits are payable to the director’s surviving spouse or designated beneficiary until the earlier of the termination of the payment period or the death of the surviving spouse or designated beneficiary. During 2017,2018, benefits were paid under this plan to fourfive former directors who retired from the Company’s Board of Directors in 2013, 2014, 2015, or 2015.2017.

Prior Plan for Directors’ Equity Compensation

The Equity Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors, originally established in February 1994, was terminated in January 2007. The original expiration date for this plan was July 1, 2009, with a maximum of 50,000 shares of common stock (115,500 shares after adjustment for the Company’s 2002 and 2003 stock dividends and 2004 stock split) for awards granted during the term of the plan. However, in February 2007, the plan was amended to provide that no new awards would be granted subsequent to January 1, 2007, and no awards have been made since that date. The plan continues in existence solely for the purpose of governing still-outstanding awards made prior to January 1, 2007.

Awards were made from shares of common stock held in the Company’s treasury and were automatic andnon-discretionary. All shares awarded under the plan have vested, have full dividend and voting rights, and are not eligible for sale while thenon-employee director is still serving as a member of the Board of Directors.

 

28

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

19


Director Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company tonon-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:    2018:

 

Name(1)
(a)
  

Fees Earned

or Paid in

Cash

($)

(b)

   

Stock
Awards(2)
($)

(c)

   

Option
Awards
($)

(d)

   

Non-Equity
Incentive

Plan
Compensation
($)

(e)

   

Change in
Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)

(f)(3)

   

All Other
Compensation
($)

(g)

   

Total    
($)    

(h)    

   

Fees Earned

or Paid in

Cash

($)

(b)

   

Stock
Awards(2)
($)

(c)

   

Option
Awards
($)

(d)

   

Non-Equity
Incentive

Plan
Compensation
($)

(e)

   

Change in
Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)

(f)(3)

   

All Other
Compensation
($)

(g)

 

Total    
($)    

(h)    

 

Annell R. Bay

   115,000        199,898        —          —          —          —          314,898       

 

115,000    

 

  

 

199,899    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

314,899    

 

Chansoo Joung

   120,000        199,898        —          —          —          —          319,898       

 

120,000    

 

  

 

199,899    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

319,899    

 

Rene R. Joyce(4)

   64,011        127,948        —          —          —          —          191,959       

 

100,000    

 

  

 

199,899    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

299,899    

 

George D. Lawrence(4)

   102,500        199,898        —          —          —          —          302,398       

 

105,000    

 

  

 

199,899    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

304,899    

 

John E. Lowe

   200,000        299,801        —          —          —          —          499,801       

 

200,000    

 

  

 

299,806    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

499,806    

 

William C. Montgomery

   120,000        199,898        —          —          —          —          319,898       

 

120,000    

 

  

 

199,899    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

319,899    

 

Amy H. Nelson

   102,500        199,898        —          —          —          —          302,398       

 

105,000    

 

  

 

199,899    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

304,899    

 

Rodman D. Patton(6)(4)

   102,500        199,898        —          —          —          —          302,398       

 

41,858    

 

  

 

—    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

1,902,357(5)    

 

 

 

1,944,216    

 

Charles J. Pitman(5)

   100,000        199,898        —          —          —          —          299,898     

Daniel W. Rabun

   100,000        199,898        —          —          —          —          299,898       

 

100,000    

 

  

 

199,899    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

299,899    

 

Peter A. Ragauss

   102,500        199,898        —          —          —          —          302,398       

 

105,000    

 

  

 

199,899    

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

  

 

—      

 

 

 

304,899    

 

 

 (1)

Employee directors do not receive additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors. John J. Christmann IV, the Company’s chief executive officer and president, is not included in this table as he was an employee of the Company during 2017.2018. The compensation he received as an employee of the Company is shown in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

 (2)

Grant date fair value, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of RSUs granted during 20172018 to eachnon-employee director based on the per share closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

 

     

None of thenon-employee directors had unvested RSUs or restricted Apache common stock atyear-end 2017.2018.

 

 (3)

Earnings not included in column (f) of the Director Compensation Table as they are not above-market or preferential earnings.

 

 (4)

Mr. Joyce joined the Board effective May 11, 2017.

(5)

Mr. Pitman retired from the Board effective December 31, 2017.

(6)

On February 8, 2018,4, 2019, Mr. Patton informedLawrence notified the Board of his intention not to stand forre-election at the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders. On February 8, 2018, Mr. Patton notified the Board of his intention not to stand forre-election at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders.

(5)

Benefits paid pursuant to the Board atOutside Directors’ Retirement Plan. Includes $593,084 in previously reported stock awards that were deferred pursuant to the May 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation Plan and the Outside Directors’ Deferral Program.

 

20

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

29


Securities Ownership and Principal Holders

The following tables set forth, as of February 28, 2018,2019, the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.625 per share, of (i) each director or nominee for director of the Company, (ii) the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers who served as officers of the Company during 2017,2018, and (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. The table also presents the ownership of shares of Class A common stock of Altus Midstream Company (“Altus”) owned of record or beneficially owned as of the record date. The Company owns an approximately 79 percent interest in Altus. As of February 28, 2019, there were 74,929,305 shares of Class A common stock of Altus outstanding. All ownership information is based upon filings made by those persons with the SEC and upon information provided to the Company.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner   Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership (1)
  Percent of Class  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership in
Apache (1)
  Percent of Class   Amount and Nature of
 Beneficial Ownership in
 Altus (1)
  Percent of Class 
Annell R. Bay 13,943 (3) * 

 

19,714

 

 

(3)

 

*

 

 

20,000

 

  

*

Juliet S. Ellis

 

 

 

   

 

        —

 

  
Chansoo Joung 59,817 (3) * 

 

65,603

 

 

(3)

 

*

 

 

25,000

 

  

*

Rene R. Joyce 12,893 (3)  

 

18,374

 

 

(3)

 

*

 

 

        —

 

  
George D. Lawrence 67,697 (2)(3) *

George D. Lawrence (8)

 

 

75,174

 

 

(2)(3)

 

*

 

 

20,000

 

  

*

John E. Lowe 35,084 (3) * 

 

48,719

 

 

(3)

 

*

 

 

50,000

 

  

*

William C. Montgomery 34,679 (3) * 

 

40,465

 

 

(3)

 

*

 

 

20,000

 

  

*

Amy H. Nelson 16,878 (3) * 

 

22,660

 

 

(3)

 

*

 

 

10,000

 

  

*

Rodman D. Patton 65,481 (2)(3) *
Daniel W. Rabun 10,996 (3) * 

 

16,689

 

 

(3)

 

*

 

 

25,000

 

  

*

Peter A. Ragauss 12,444 (3) * 

 

18,175

 

 

(3)

 

*

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

                         

 

 

*

John J. Christmann IV 677,789 (4)(5)(6)(7) * 

 

976,737

 

 

(4)(5)(6)(7)

 

*

 

 

25,000

 

  

*

Stephen J. Riney 179,830 (5)(6)(7) * 

 

287,584

 

 

(5)(6)(7)

 

*

 

 

25,000

 

  

*

P. Anthony Lannie 273,782 (5)(6)(7) * 

 

341,822

 

 

(5)(6)(7)

 

*

 

 

25,000

 

  

*

W. Kregg Olson 309,414 (4)(5)(6)(7) *
Timothy J. Sullivan 159,388 (4)(5)(6)(7) * 

 

225,517

 

 

(4)(5)(6)(7)

 

*

 

 

25,000

 

  

*

Grady L. Ables

 

 

146,076

 

 

(5)(6)(7)

 

*

 

 

25,000

 

  

*

All directors, nominees, and executive officers as a group (including the above named persons)         2,254,934 (4)(5)(6)(7)       * 

 

        2,579,256

 

 

(4)(5)(6)(7)

 

*

 

 

            320,000

 

  

*

 

*

Represents less than one percent of outstanding stock of common stock.stock of the Company or Class A common stock of Altus, as applicable.

 

(1)

All ownership is sole and direct unless otherwise noted. Inclusion of any common stock not owned directly shall not be construed as an admission of beneficial ownership. Fractional stock have been rounded to the nearest whole share.

 

(2)

Includes vested restricted common stock awarded under the Company’s Equity Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors.

 

(3)

Includes the following common share equivalents related to retainer fees deferred under the Company’sNon-Employee Directors’ Compensation Plan and/or the Company’s Outside Directors’ Deferral Program: Ms. Bay – 13,943;19,714; Mr. Joung – 14,532;20,318; Mr. Joyce – 2,893;8,374; Mr. Lawrence – 24,731;30,899; Mr. Lowe – 20,084;28,719; Mr. Montgomery – 14,532;20,318; Ms. Nelson – 14,378; Mr. Patton – 34,811;20,160; Mr. Rabun – 10,996;16,689; and Mr. Ragauss – 12,444.18,175.

 

(4)

Includes the following common stock equivalents held through the Company’s Deferred Delivery Plan: Mr. Christmann – 40,334; Mr. Olson – 16,591;58,136; Mr. Sullivan – 6,578;6,751; and all executive officers as a group – 65,567.67,681.

 

(5)

Includes the following shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding employee stock options, which are exercisable within 60 days: Mr. Christmann – 167,772;276,183; Mr. Riney – 36,290;73,534; Mr. Lannie – 112,539; Mr. Olson – 100,457;133,863; Mr. Sullivan – 53,620;78,118; Mr. Ables – 31,357; and all executive officers as a group – 558,370.678,252.

 

(6)

Includes the following shares of common stock held by the trustee of the Company’s 401(k) Savings Plan and/orNon-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan: Mr. Christmann – 76,729;88,224; Mr. Riney – 18,489;18,972; Mr. Lannie – 30,930; Mr. Olson – 40,912;31,712; Mr. Sullivan – 12,579;12,907; Mr. Ables – 17,645; and all executive officers as a group – 225,389.201,487.

 

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

21


(7)

Includes the following RSUs granted under the Company’s 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan and the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan: Mr. Christmann – 238,494;285,238; Mr. Riney – 81,086;116,518; Mr. Lannie – 73,288; Mr. Olson – 56,225;86,364; Mr. Sullivan – 48,428;64,151; Mr. Ables – 55,462; and all executive officers as a group – 619,124.700,174.

 

30(8)

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy StatementOn February 4, 2019, Mr. Lawrence notified the Board of his intention not to stand forre-election at the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders.


The following table sets forth the only persons known to the Company to be the owners of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2017,2018, based on the information available as of February 28, 2018,2019, according to reports filed with the SEC:

 

 Title of Class  

    Name and Address of

    Beneficial Owner

  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percent of Class     

 

Common Stock

    par value $0.625

  

Dodge & Cox

555 California Street, 40th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

  31,343,24552,383,637 (a)   8.2013.80  

    Common Stock

    par value $0.625

  

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

  26,996,99840,538,777 (b)   7.0810.68 

    Common Stock

    par value $0.625

  

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, New York 10055

  25,437,72827,130,392 (c)   6.707.10  

    Common Stock

    par value $0.625

  

Baillie Gifford & Co

Calton Square

1 Greenside Row

Edinburgh EH1 3AN

Scotland, UK

24,364,479 (d)6.42 

    Common Stock

    par value $0.625

Davis Selected Advisers, L.P.

2949 East Elvira Road, Suite 101

Tucson, Arizona 85756

  20,650,094 (d)22,882,206 (e)   5.406.00 

    Common Stock

    par value $0.625

  

State Street Corporation

State Street Financial Center

One Lincoln Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02111

  20,023,249 (e)20,623,888 (f)   5.265.40 

    Common Stock

    par value $0.625

Harris Associates L.P.

111 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 4600

Chicago, Illinois 60606

19,644,841 (g)5.20  

 

(a)

Per Schedule 13G/A filed by Dodge & Cox on February 13, 2018.14, 2019.

(b)

Per Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group on February 12, 2018.11, 2019.

(c)

Per Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. on February 8, 2018.4, 2019.

(d)

Per Schedule 13G filed by Baillie Gifford & Co on January 9, 2019.

(e)

Per Schedule 13G/A filed by Davis Selected Advisors, L.P. on February 13, 2018.2019.

(e)(f)

Per Schedule 13G filed by State Street Corporation on February 13, 2018.11, 2019.

(g)

Per Schedule 13G filed by Harris Associates L.P. on February 14, 2019.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s directors and officers, as well as beneficial owners of ten percent or more of the Company’s common stock, to report their holdings and transactions in the Company’s securities. Based on information furnished to the Company and contained in reports provided pursuant to Section 16(a), as well as written representations that no other reports were required for 2017,2018, the Company’s directors and officers timely filed all reports required by Section 16(a).

22

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2017,2018, relating to the Company’s equity compensation plans, under which grants of stock options, RSUs, and other rights to acquire shares of Apache common stock may be granted from time to time.

 

   (a)   (b)   (c)  
 Plan Category  Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(#)
   Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and
Rights
($)
   

Number of Securities Remaining 
Available for Future Issuance 
Under Equity Compensation 
Plans 

(Excluding Securities Reflected 
in 

Column (a)) 

(#) 

 

 Equity compensation

 plans approved by

 security holders(1)(5)

   11,488,207      83.37(3)      16,939,823(4)  

 Equity compensation

 plans not approved by

 security holders(2)(5)

   205,836      —         571,207     

 TOTAL

   11,694,043      83.37(3)      17,511,030     

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

31


   

(a)

   

(b)

   

(c) 

 
 Plan Category  Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(#)
   Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and
Rights
($)
   

Number of Securities Remaining 

Available for Future Issuance 

Under Equity Compensation 

Plans 

(Excluding Securities Reflected 

in 

Column (a)) 

(#) 

 

 Equity compensation

 plans approved by

 security holders(1)(5)

  

 

9,478,035  

 

  

 

75.95(3)  

 

  

 

16,159,233(4) 

 

 Equity compensation

 plans not approved by

 security holders(2)(5)

  

 

246,895  

 

  

 

—       

 

  

 

565,921    

 

 TOTAL

  

 

9,724,930  

 

  

 

75.95(3)  

 

  

 

16,725,154    

 

(1)

Includes the Company’s 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, and 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan.

 

(2)

Includes the Directors’ Compensation Plan and Deferred Delivery Plan.

 

    

The Company’s Deferred Delivery Plan allows officers and certain key employees to defer income from RSUs granted under the 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, the 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, and the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan in the form of deferred units. Each deferred unit is equivalent to one share of Apache common stock. Distributions from the plan are made, at the election of the participant, beginning five years from deferral or upon termination of employment.

 

(3)

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options; excludes RSUs, performance-based stock units, and deferred stock units.

 

(4)

Available for grant under the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan, as of December 31, 2017.2018.

 

(5)

See Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, for the material features of the 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, and 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan.

Executive Officers of the Company

Biographical information, as of December 31, 2017,April 9, 2019, for the executive officers of the Company is set forth below. Biographical information for John J. Christmann IV is set forth above under the caption “Nominees for Election as Directors.”

GRADY L. ABLES,56,57, was appointed senior region vice president – North Sea, Egypt, and Houston Operations and HSSE in February 2018, having been senior region vice president – North Sea Operations, HSSE, and Global Technical Services since July 31, 2017; senior region vice president – North Sea and Canada since June 2016; region vice president – Canada region and president of Apache Canada since June 2015, and region vice president – central regionCentral Region since July 2014. Prior to joining the Company in 2007 as drilling manager for joint venture Khalda Petroleum Company in Egypt, his experience included 17 years with Total Fina Elf and its predecessor company.

REBECCA A. HOYT, 53,54, was appointed senior vice president, chief accounting officer, and controller in August 2014, having been vice president, chief accounting officer, and controller since November 2010. She previously served as the Company’s vice president and controller since November 2006, assistant controller since 2003, and held positions of increasing responsibility within the accounting area since joining the Company in 1993. Previously, Ms. Hoyt was an audit manager with Arthur Andersen LLP, an independent public accounting firm, from 1992 to 1993.

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

23


P. ANTHONY LANNIE, 63,65, was appointed executive vice president and general counsel in August 2009, and was interim chief financial officer from October 9, 2014 through March 2, 2015. Mr. Lannie served as senior vice president and general counsel since May 2004, and vice president and general counsel since March 2003. Prior to joining the Company, he was president of Kinder Morgan Power Company, Houston, Texas, from 2000 through February 2003, and president of Coral Energy Canada in 1999. Mr. Lannie was senior vice president and general counsel of Coral Energy, an affiliate of Shell Oil Company and Tejas Gas Corporation, from 1995 through 1999, and of Tejas Gas Corporation from 1994 until its combination with Coral Energy in 1998.

W. KREGG OLSON,MARK MEYER, 64,55, was appointednamed executive vice president—corporate reservoir engineering in August 2009,president – Energy Technology, Data Analytics & Commercial Intelligence effective Jan. 2019, having previously been senior vice president—corporate reservoir engineeringpresident – Energy Technology, Data Analytics & Commercial Intelligence since SeptemberSept. 2018 and senior vice president – Energy Technology Strategies since March 2018. In the three years prior to joining Apache, he was managing director and, most recently, head of securities and research with Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co., a Houston-based energy-focused investment and merchant bank. From 2005 to 2015, Mr. Meyer managed a variety of energy portfolios for institutional clients, most notably as president of RR Advisors, LLC from 2007 to 2015 where he wasco-founder of its upstream-oriented public and private equity strategies. From 1999 to 2005, he was the lead equity research analyst at Simmons & Company International and Goldman Sachs. Prior to his equity research and institutional investing career, Mr. Meyer served from 1985 to 1999 in a variety of management consulting and oil & gas industry managerial, technical and operational roles, both domestically and internationally with AT Kearney, Union Texas Petroleum, Exxon and Chevron.

DAVID A. PURSELL, 54, is executive vice president—corporate reservoir engineering since Januarypresident of Planning, Reserves and Fundamentals. Before joining Apache in early 2018, Pursell served as managing director of Investment Banking for Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (TPH). Before that, he served as head of Macro Research and was one of the founders of Pickering Energy Partners, Inc. in 2004. Prior to that,TPH, Mr. Olson served asPursell was director of technical services from 1995 through 2003,Upstream Research at Simmons & Company International. Earlier in his career, he worked in various production and held positions of increasing responsibility within corporate reservoir engineering since joiningassignments at S.A. Holditch and Associates, which is now part of Schlumberger. While at Holditch, Mr. Pursell’s focus was on unconventional gas development in the CompanyUS and India as well as international field studies in 1992. Previously, he was associatedMexico, Egypt, Venezuela, Indonesia, and Russia. He began his career at ARCO Alaska in Anchorage with Grace Petroleum Corporation.production and operations engineering assignments in South Alaska and the North Slope.

DOMINIC J. RICOTTA,53,54, was appointed senior vice president – human resourcesHuman Resources in September 2016, having been vice president and associate general counsel since July 2010, and assistant general counsel since May 2007. Prior to joining the Company in 1998, he was a partner in the law firm of Holme, Roberts & Owen LLP.

STEPHEN J. RINEY, 57,58, was appointed executive vice president on February 18, 2015, and chief financial officer effective March 3, 2015. Prior to joining the Company, he served as chief financial officer for BP Exploration and Production from July 2012 to January 2015, and global head of mergers and acquisitions for BP p.l.c. from January 2007 to June 2012.

TIMOTHY J. SULLIVAN, 62,63, was appointed executive vice president – operations supportOperations Support effective January 1, 2016, having been senior vice president – operations supportOperations Support since June 2015. In this role, he supports the Company’s CEO in operational strategy, goal setting, capital allocation, market intelligence, and marketing. Previously, he served as region vice president – Canada, and president of Apache Canada from January 2013 through May 2015, reservoir engineering manager for the Central region from January 1997 to January 2013, and senior reservoir engineer from 1986 through 1996. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sullivan worked in various engineering roles for Cotton Petroleum Corporation and Texaco Inc.

 

 3224   

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

26

2018 Compensation Program Overview

26

Shareholder Feedback

27

Compensation Best Practices

30

About Apache

31

2018 Business Highlights

32

NEO Compensation

34

Elements of the 2018 Compensation Program

36

Base Salary

36

Annual Incentive Compensation

36

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

46

Benefits

50

Elements of the 2019 Compensation Program

50

2019 Base Salary

51

2019 Annual Incentive Compensation

51

2019 Long-Term Incentive Award Mix

51

2019 Long-Term Compensation Awards

51

2019 Stock Ownership Requirements

52

Decision-Making Process

52

Our Approach to Pay

52

Our Compensation Philosophy

52

Role of the Board of Directors

55

Role of the MD&C Committee

56

Role of the Compensation Consultant

56

Role of Management

56

Risk Considerations in Compensation Programs

57

Tax Legislation Related to Compensation

57

MD&C Committee Report

58

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

25


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) section describes the compensation program for our Chief Executive Officer and President (referred to throughout as our CEO and President) and the other Named Executive Officers (NEOs). Our current NEOs, who also served as our NEOs in 2017, are:(together, the NEOs):

 

  NameNamed Executive Officer  Title

John J. Christmann IV

  

Chief Executive Officer and President

Stephen J. Riney

  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

P. Anthony Lannie

  Executive Vice President and General Counsel

  W. Kregg Olson

Executive Vice President – Corporate Reservoir Engineering

Timothy J. Sullivan

  Executive Vice President, Operations Support

Grady L. Ables

Senior Region Vice President, North Sea, Egypt, and Houston Operations

Shareholder Outreach2018 Compensation Program Overview

 

  ElementObjectiveDetail

Base Salary

Recruit and retain executive talent with experience in oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) companies operating in the United States and internationally

u  Target base pay at peer median

u  Review base salaries annually

Annual Incentive Compensation

Motivate and reward our NEOs and employees to create long-term value by achieving key business objectives in 2018

u  Base achievement againstpre-determined corporate objectives, 83 percent of which are quantitative and 17 percent qualitative in 2018 as follows:

·  20 percent quantitative cash return on invested capital (CROIC)1 goal in response to shareholder feedback asking that the Company focus on generating competitive returns

·  10 percent goal related to health, safety, security and the environment (HSSE), including methane emissions intensity and fresh water usage

·  30 percent quantitative operational goals related to key aspects of the business, including cost management, production, and economic reserve replacement, and drilling program rate of return (removed for 2019 in favor of greater emphasis on CROIC)

·  23 percent quantitative/binary strategic goals related to midstream optimization, return on capital employed (ROCE)2, and free cash flow

·  17 percent qualitative strategic goals related to an Alpine High development plan, portfolio management, and technology strategies

u  Establish targets for each objective at the beginning of the year based on our corporate plan for allocating capital (the “plan”)

u  Set aggressive targets at or above plan to support execution of our corporate objectives in any commodity price environment

1

CROIC is calculated with the numerator as cash flow from operations before changes in working capital, excluding Egypt noncontrolling interests, with financing costs added back, and the denominator as average debt plus average Apache shareholders’ equity.

2

ROCE is calculated with the numerator as adjusted earnings plus financing costs and taxes (excluding Egypt taxes) and the denominator as average debt plus average Apache shareholders’ equity

26

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


  ElementObjectiveDetail

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Align the long-term interests of our NEOs and employees with the long-term interests of our shareholders

u  Base awards on 50 percent performance shares (increased to 55 percent for 2019), 35 percent restricted stock units, and 15 percent options (for 2019, replaced with 10 percent cash-based restricted stock unit awards tied to the Altus Midstream Company stock price)

u  Vest half of the performance shares at the end of a three-year performance period, and the remaining half at the end of the fourth year

u  Incorporate relative and absolute metrics in the performance share program to provide a balanced assessment of long-term performance (including the introduction of a long-term CROIC metric and negative TSR modifier for 2019)

u  Require the CEO and President to hold 10x his base salary in Company stock beginning in 2019 (an increase from 6x); maintain stock ownership requirements for all officers

Shareholder Feedback

Prior to our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we reached out to shareholders representing 70 percent of shares outstanding regarding our compensation practices. Shareholders representing 63 percent of shares outstanding either met with us or indicated that a meeting would not be necessary. At our 20172018 Annual Meeting, our say on pay proposal received support from 9679 percent of our shareholders who voted on the proposal. While theThe Board is encouraged that a vastsubstantial majority of our shareholders supported our compensation program design, it continuedas designed. Nevertheless, the MD&C Committee recognized that there is room for relentless improvement in all facets, an Apache core value. As a result, we proactively sought to seek shareholder feedback throughout the year.understand our shareholders’ preferences and address any significant areas of concern through improvements to our disclosures and compensation programs.

Accordingly, we conducted broad outreach in 2017. Over the course of the year, our team held 82 meetings

We then offered to meet with shareholders representing 58holding 78 percent of shares outstanding in total, including meetingsto solicit feedback on our proposed changes, as well as to discuss environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. We met with 17shareholders holding 53 percent of shares outstanding, with the others indicating that a meeting would not be necessary. Our independent chairman and chair of the MD&C Committee were available for all of our top 25 investors.shareholder meetings throughout 2018 unless a shareholder preferred to speak with one or the other, or with management, directly. Members of management participated in each meeting, with certain engagements including an independent director. A key objective of these engagement sessions was to solicit shareholder feedback on aspects of our executive compensation program.every meeting. Shareholder feedback whether solicited by management or certain directors, was relayed directly to the MD&C Committee and the full Board, which considered thatthe feedback while evaluating opportunitiesbefore making the following changes to further enhance our executivethe compensation programs.programs:

 

What We Heard  Shareholder Feedback  Change ImplementedOur Response

·    SeveralOur shareholders expressed concern with the rigor of the Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental (HSSE) operational goal component of the annual cash incentive bonus, as it was set to internal benchmarking, and whether it incentivized HSSE performance beyond safety.

·    Shareholders expresseda concern with the lack of a return on capital employed (ROCE) metric in the compensation program, based on their belief that such a metric is highly correlated with stock price performanceprograms of exploration and drives long-term value creation.production (E&P) companies.

  

·In 2016,For our 2018 annual incentive compensation plan, we set Apache’s health and safety goals based onadded a quantitative operational metric for CROIC weighted at 20 percent. For 2019, we increased the top quartile, three-year average performance of industry peers. For 2017 executive compensation, we expanded HSSE goalsweight to include a comprehensive qualitative assessment of leading and lagging measures to drive excellence in facets of HSSE beyond safety.25 percent.

 

·We includedAlso for our 2018 annual incentive compensation plan, we added a cash return on invested capital (CROIC) measure (weighted 20 percent) and a newquantitative (binary) strategic goal relatedrelating to double-digit ROCEROCE.

 For our 2019 long-term incentive compensation plan, we introduced a long-term (three-year) CROIC measure set at the beginning of the performance period tied to 50 percent of the performance shares. The other half remains tied to relative TSR. To further enhance the weight of the long-term CROIC measure in 2019, we increased the 2018 annual cash incentive planlong-term performance share award weighting from 50 to further intensify our focus on efficient, profitable operations.55 percent of the overall mix.

We firmly believe that the changes we have made to our compensation program are responsive to shareholder concerns and that our compensation program effectively aligns executive compensation with the key drivers of long-term growth and economic value creation for our shareholders. Going forward, we remain committed to gathering and evaluating our shareholders’ input on Apache’s compensation program.

 

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

   3327


  Shareholder FeedbackOur Response

Our shareholders requested additional disclosure regarding the achievement of the strategic goals portion of the annual cash incentive plan, as well as payouts under the performance share programs.

 Starting with the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan, we have implemented a scorecard approach for the MD&C Committee’s strategic goal assessment to promote transparency and differentiate between quantitative and qualitative metrics, answering the question “How did the MD&C Committee weight and score each goal?”

 To provide additional context, we have explained the business rationale for each strategic goal, answering the question “How does each goal advance the Company’s long-term strategy?”

 In the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan, we increased the weighting of our operational goals to 60 percent, a level we have maintained in the 2019 plan (from 50 percent in the 2017 plan); in addition, in the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan we explain that 83 percent of the overall performance measures are quantifiable.

 We have enhanced disclosure around the 2016-2018 performance share program payout (and will do so again for future performance share program payouts), including specifics on the overall TSR rank and quantitative measures.

Our shareholders reinforced their view that the compensation for our NEOs should be aligned with performance.

 We have maintained strong alignment between the CEO and President’s realized pay and our stock price performance.

 We have reinforced that strong alignment by increasing the CEO and President’s holding requirement from 6x his base salary to 10x his base salary, while retaining the requirement that he hold until retirement a minimum of 15 percent of all shares from vesting of restricted stock units and realization of performance-based awards.

 We have also held flat our CEO and President’s base salary, target bonus, and target equity in 2018 and 2019.

Our shareholders expressed a preference for a payout cap in the event of negative absolute TSR performance.

 We introduced a 1x target cap for the 50 percent TSR portion of the 2019 performance share program in the event the Company’s absolute TSR for the three-year performance period is negative, supplementing the negative discretion currently held by the MD&C Committee; in other words, even if the cap applies, the MD&C Committee can still exercise negative discretion.

 We established a payout schedule that ensures no payout at or above target in the TSR portion of the 2019 performance share program unless the Company clearly finishes in the top half of its peers with respect to relative TSR performance.

Our shareholders expressed a keen interest in ESG issues.

 Commencing with our 2018 annual incentive compensation plan, we began to link compensation directly to the reduction of methane emissions intensity and fresh water usage as part of our assessment of the health, safety, security, and environment goal.

 For our 2019 annual incentive compensation plan, we have added a strategic goal relating to diversity and inclusion in science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines, building on the Company’s successful efforts in these areas.

We received mixed feedback from shareholders regarding the use of stock options in the long-term compensation plan.

 We created Altus Midstream Company in 2018, the success of which is very important to Apache; therefore, for 2019, we replaced stock options (then weighted at 15 percent of the long-term compensation plan) with cash-based restricted stock unit awards tied to the midstream company’s stock price (weighted at 10 percent of the plan).

 Concurrently, for 2019 we sought to ensure that the performance share program constitutes a majority of the long-term compensation plan (increased from 50 to 55 percent).

28

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


  Shareholder FeedbackOur Response

We held candid discussions with shareholders on the appropriate peer groups for purposes of compensation and relative TSR.

 For the 2019 compensation program, we have identified two separate peer groups for compensation and performance: (1) a compensation peer group that takes into account our competition for executive talent among oil and gas exploration and production companies that, like Apache, operate in the United States and internationally; and (2) a TSR performance peer group that takes into account a balanced view of market competition for the production and sale of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids from conventional and unconventional resources.

 The newly constituted compensation peer group required the removal of two compensation peers from our current peer group that do not have international operations. We have added in their place a single peer that operates in the United States and internationally.

 The new TSR performance peer group consists of independent E&P companies that explore for, produce, and sell the full hydrocarbon value stream, representing a balanced mix of those that favor crude oil production and those that favor the production of natural gas and natural gas liquids, thus augmenting the current peer group, which is heavily weighted toward crude oil production and therefore does not capture Apache’s market competition for our increased production of natural gas and natural gas liquids from Alpine High. With respect to size, Apache falls in the middle band of the new TSR peer group.

 During our outreach efforts, our shareholders generally reacted positively to the new peer groups based on the rationale presented above and suggested that we include a description of our rationale when announcing the change.

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

29 


2017 Compensation Highlights

The changes to our 2018 and 2019 compensation programs are responsive to the feedback we received from our shareholders. Our compensation programs reflect our shareholders’ preferences, generating strong alignment between our corporate incentives and our shareholders’ interests. We will continue to engage proactively with our shareholders in 2019 and beyond.

 

u

We continued an effort begun in 2013 to comprehensively review and modify Apache’s executive compensation programs to ensure that they support ourpay-for-performanceHIGHLIGHTS: philosophy, align executives’ interests with those of our shareholders, and attract, motivate, and retain exceptional executive talent. Accordingly, the following changes were made to our executive compensation programs for 2017:

OUR RESPONSE TO SHAREHOLDER FEEDBACK

 

20% & 25%

·Weighting of

1YR CROIC

 

Expanded our HSSE goals for the annual cash incentive plan to include a comprehensive qualitative assessment50%

Weighting of both leading and lagging measures to drive excellence in facets of HSSE beyond safety;

3YR CROIC

 · 

Removed the annual relative TSR measure (weighted 10 percent) from the annual cash incentive bonus to avoid overlap with our long-term compensation program;55%

Weighting of Performance Awards

 

ANNUAL RETURNS METRIC

2018 & 2019, RESPECTIVELY

 · 

Further enhanced the rigor of our reserve replacement goal to focus on both quantity (as a percent of production) and quality (Finding & Development cost/BOED) of reserves;

LONG-TERM RETURNS METRIC

2019

 · 

Reduced the enhanced life insurance benefit for the CEO by 75 percent;

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN, 2019

 

83%

·Quantitative

 

Included a cash return on invested capital (CROIC) measure (weighted 20 percent) and a new strategic goal related to double-digit ROCE in the 2018 annual incentive plan to further intensify focus on efficient, profitable operations; and10X

CEO Salary

 · 

Weighted the TSR CAP

at Target

ANNUAL GOALS

2018

CEO STOCK OWNERSHIP

2019

FOR NEGATIVE ABSOLUTE TSR

2019

ESG

Metrics

SCORECARD

Disclosure

FLAT

CEO Pay

SCORING METHANE EMISSIONS INTENSITY, FRESH WATER USE

2018 annual incentive plan 40 percent on operational goals, 40 percent on strategic goals, and 20 percent on CROIC;& 2019

TRANSPARENT RATIONALE, WEIGHTING, & SCORING

2018 & 2019

CEO SALARY, TARGET BONUS,

& TARGET EQUITY

2018 & 2019

u

We modified outstanding restricted stock unit (RSU) awards to allow continued vesting upon retirement after attaining age 55 and a certain combination of age and years of service; and

u

The MD&C Committee determined to award the corporate performance element under the annual cash incentive program at 95 percent of target, which included an eight percent discretionary reduction from the calculated achievement of 103 percent. This was at the lower end of the 88 percent to 118 percent range actually achieved, due to underperformance of our operational goals and to better align outcomes with the decline in our stock price during 2017.

PayCompensation Best Practices

 

Our compensation best practices include:

 

 u

Significant Performance-Based Pay: 50 percent and 46 percent of the ongoing pay mix for For our CEO and currentPresident, as well as our other NEOs, 53 percent and 49 percent of their ongoing pay mix is variable and performance-based, respectively. In the 2018 plan in aggregate, 50 percent of the target compensation for our CEO and President and the other NEOs for 2017 is variable and performance-based. We use multiple metrics to evaluate company performance in our compensation programs.

 

 u

Long-term vestingLong-Term Vesting:: Our equity-based paycompensation vehicles have multi-year vesting periods toof a minimum of three years. The performance share program has a three-year performance period, after which 50 percent of the shares vest, while the remaining 50 percent vests in the fourth year. These vesting periods reward long-term performance and deter inappropriate risk taking.

 

 u

Multiple Performance MeasuresShare Unit (PSU) Vesting Cap for Negative TSR:Beginning in 2019, the relative TSR portion of PSUs will be capped at target if absolute shareholder returns over the performance period are negative. For the historic 2017 and 2018 performance share programs, the MD&C Committee can exercise negative discretion. For the 2019 plan, the cap augments negative discretion. In other words, the MD&C Committee can exercise negative discretion even if the cap applies.

30

APACHE CORPORATION:-2019 Proxy Statement


u

Strong Risk Mitigating Provisions; Ownership Requirements: We use multiple metricshave stock ownership requirements for our directors and officers, anti-hedging and pledging policies, and a clawback policy. This includes a new stock ownership requirement for the CEO and President equal to evaluate Company performance, covering both short-term and long-term performance objectives.10x his base salary, increased from 6x.

 

 u

Stock Ownership Requirements: We have stock ownership requirements for our directors and officers. Our CEO must holdsix-times base salaryBest in stock, and all officers and directors have hold-until-retirement or termination requirements in addition to theirmultiple-of-pay holding requirements. All of our NEOs comply with, and own shares sufficient to meet, these ownership requirements.

u

ClassNo Repricing: Our stock options cannot be repriced, reset, or exchanged for cash if under water without shareholder approval.

u

Anti-Pledging and Hedging Policies: We prohibit our directors and executive officers from (i) holding Apache securities in a margin account or pledging any Apache securities as collateral for a loan and (ii) entering into any hedge or other transaction in Apache securities that limits the risk of ownership of Apache common stock or stock options.

u

Double Trigger Change in Control Provisionsand Severance Provisions:: We have a formal policy of requiring a double trigger to receive cash severance and to receive accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change in control.

34

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


u

Clawback: Each equity award is conditioned on repayment or forfeiture as required by existing law, including We maintain a policy that standardizes executive separation terms and minimizes the Sarbanes-Oxley Actrisk of 2002 and Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In addition, under our Executive Compensation Clawback Policy, each executive officer’s incentive award is subject to repayment or such other means of recovery (or a combination thereof) as the Board determines appropriate in the event of a material negative restatement as the result of fraud, intentional misconduct, or gross negligence by such executive officer.

u

Minimum Vesting: Our 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan requires three-year minimum vesting (in full) of equity awards to employees (including our executive officers).

u

No Employment Contracts:excessive payouts. All of our employees, including our NEOs, are employed “at will,” with no employment contracts.

 

 u

Executive Termination PolicyNo Repricing::We maintain a policy that standardizes executive separation terms and minimizes the risk of excessive payouts. Our stock options cannot be repriced, reset, or exchanged for cash if under water without shareholder approval.

TableAbout Apache

Apache Corporation explores for, develops, and produces crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. In 2018 worldwide, we leased 15.4 million gross acres of Contentsoil, gas and mineral interests, operated an average of 32 drilling rigs, and drilled 367 gross operated oil and gas wells.

LOGO

Our exploration and production operations span four continents. Our global acreage holdings are extensive, roughly1,000 times the size of Manhattan Island:

 

u

Permian Region, based in Midland, Texas, which operates our Permian Basin, Midland Basin, and Central Basin Platform assets in West Texas and New Mexico;

CD&A OVERVIEW u36

North American Unconventional Resources Region (NAUR), based in San Antonio, Texas, which operates Alpine High and other assets in the Delaware Basin as well as unconventional exploration opportunities throughout the United States;

Who We Are

 u36

Houston Region, based in Houston, Texas, which operates ourmid-continent assets in Texas and Oklahoma as well as our assets in the Gulf of Mexico and south Louisiana;

2017 Business Highlights

 u37

Egypt Region, based in Cairo, Egypt, which operates our extensive assets in the Western Desert of Egypt;

Sustained Focus on Long-Term Value Creation

 u39

North Sea Region, based in Aberdeen, Scotland, which operates our assets offshore in the United Kingdom North Sea, including manned platforms; and

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

 39
OUR APPROACH TO PAYu40

Our Compensation Philosophy

40

Peer GroupsSuriname, which offers exploration potential in South America, offshore Blocks 53 and Data

40
ELEMENTS OF THE 2017 COMPENSATION PROGRAM41

Base Salary

41

Annual Cash Incentive Bonus

41

Long-Term Compensation

44

Benefits

47

Compensation Decisions With Respect58, adjacent to 2018recent discoveries offshore Guyana, a region where energy production has recently emerged as a major potential resource.

47
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS49

Role of the Board of Directors

49

Role of the Management Development and Compensation Committee

49

Role of the Compensation Consultant

49

Role of Management

50
RISK CONSIDERATIONS IN OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS50
TAX LEGISLATION RELATED TO COMPENSATION50
MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT51

 

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

   3531 


We are one of only 11 independent E&P companies of any size operating both in the United States and internationally. A multinational E&P business is far more complex than a pure-play onshore U.S. business, including with respect to geography (land and sea), geology (conventional and unconventional rock), foreign labor markets, the availability of equipment and supplies in foreign ports, geopolitics, downstream markets (including local markets for natural gas in the absence of takeaway capacity for liquefied natural gas), taxes, time zones, international travel, safety case regimes, security concerns, governing laws and regulations, and economic conditions. We must attract and retain executive talent with international experience and a proven track record of handling these complex risks and opportunities.

During the period 2015-2018, our transformation has been dramatic. Prior to 2015, Apache was known as an “acquire and exploit” E&P company. We purchased assets from major oil and gas companies that were not attracting their investment dollars and gave those assets new life. Beginning in 2015, we shifted to an organic growth model, recognizing that long-term success depended on our ability to explore for new resources.

Our Strategic Focus

  Safety

  Environmental responsibility

  Competitive returns

  Cash flow neutrality

  Returning value to shareholders

  High impact exploration

  Production and reserves growth

  Leading technology

  Balanced portfolio

CD&A Overview

Who We AreThis has resulted in a complete transformation of our portfolio:

 

 

Apache Corporation explores for, develops,LOGO

1Q2015 CEO/CFO Announcement April 2015 LNG Exit: Australia and produces natural gas, crude oil,Canada June 2015 Australia Exit Sept. 2016 Alpine High Discovery Announced June 2017 Canada Exit Nov. 2018 Altus Midstream Transaction Closed 2019 Suriname Block 58 Exploration

During this period of time, we maintained our dividend payments, repurchased shares, reduced our debt, avoided shareholder dilution, increased our Permian Region production, sustained robust free cash flow from our Egypt and natural gas liquids with operationsNorth Sea regions, developed differential exploration opportunities in the United States, Egypt,U.S. lower 48 and Suriname, created a new U.S. midstream entity anchored by our Alpine High assets, and strategically balanced our portfolio through the United Kingdom (UK) North Sea. We also conduct exploratory activities in two blocks offshore Suriname that may, over time, result indivestment of noncore assets. In addition, Apache is on track to achieve long-term, sustainable double-digit CROIC, as well as steady reserves and production growth utilizing enhanced technology strategies. In our 2018 Sustainability Report, we show the many ways we have achieved these milestones sustainably, including with the reduction of methane emissions intensity and fresh water usage and a reportable discoverymore diverse and development opportunity. In 2017, we operated an average of 35 rigs worldwide and drilled 274 gross operated wells, 165 of which were U.S. onshore.inclusive workforce.

2018 Business Highlights

 

LOGO

Our operating regions include:Apache has a clear vision, mission, and strategy:

 

u

United States, whichOurVISION is comprised ofto be the Permian (including Alpine High inpremier exploration and production company, contributing to global progress by helping meet the Delaware Basin), MidContinent/Gulf Coast, and the Gulf of Mexico offshore regions;world’s energy needs.

 

u

Egypt;OurMISSION is to grow in an innovative, safe, environmentally responsible and profitable manner for the long-term benefit of our stakeholders.

 

u

Offshore U.K. inOurSTRATEGY is to take a differentiated approach to the North Sea;exploration and production of cost advantaged hydrocarbons through innovation, technology, optimization, continuous improvement, and relentless focus on costs to deliver top–tier, long-term returns.

The U.S. Permian Basin was a key focus for us in 2018, with total production up 34 percent. In the Midland and Delaware Basins, part of the prolific Permian Basin, full-pattern development generated significant cost and productivity improvements, which in turn contributed to oil production growth. We also introduced industry-leading well completion methods, which helped lower costs.

u

Blocks 53 and 58 in offshore Suriname.

 

 3632   

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement


PERMIAN BASIN GROWTH

Ourtop-tier Permian Basin position serves as a key foundation for long-term growth

34%

Overall Production Growth (Mboe/d)

158 Mboe/d to 211 Mboe/d

17%

Oil Production Growth (Mboe/d)

78 Mboe/d to 91 Mboe/d

2017 Business HighlightsAs a strategic part of our Permian Basin story, Alpine High is expected to deliver significant future returns and growth, following a multi-year period of testing, delineation, and infrastructure investment. The production ramp to date has already been substantial, and we have identified thousands of drilling locations, creating decades of development runway. We are initially targeting the highly economic liquids-rich natural gas zones.

 

ALPINE HIGH

Progress & Outlook

Big Production Ramp

Average net production of approximately 41.5 Mboe/d in 2018, a 337 percent increase over 2017

More Wells on Production

Nearly doubled the number of wells placed on production in 2018 versus 2016 and 2017 combined

Well Costs Down, Productivity Up

Delivered more than 25 percent cost reduction in 2018, on a per lateral foot basis, and productivity improved

Robust Development Model

To support optimization of project economics within a variable product and pricing environment

5,000+ Locations

Drilling locations identified to date, with an unprecedented hydrocarbon column more than 5,000’ thick

In 2017,2018, Apache continued its missionannounced the creation of Altus Midstream Company, a pure-play, Permian to grow in an innovative, safe, environmentally responsible,Gulf Coast midstreamC-corporation, which upon closing on November 9, 2018, took ownership of certain midstream assets at Alpine High related to gathering, processing, and profitable manner fortransporting natural gas and natural gas liquids (taking the long-term benefit of our shareholders. We also progressed Apache’s strategy of deliveringtop-tier returns by maximizing recovery and minimizing costs through continuous improvement. Apache’s strategy for value creation comprises the following investment attributes:products from wellhead to market):

 

ALTUS MIDSTREAM

A New, Premier Midstream Enterprise in the Permian Basin

Prime Location for Midstream Assets

Pure-play Permian midstream company situated in the southern Delaware Basin,

at the crossroads of significant E&P activity

InnovativeC-corporation Structure

Publicly traded company (NASDAQ: ALTM) formed with Kayne Anderson Acquisition Corp. in the midst of a challenging IPO environment; Apache owns approximately 79 percent of the 325 million shares outstanding

No Debt at Closing

Market cap of approximately $2.7 billion, with $625 million cash on hand and zero debt as of the October 1, 2018 effective date; up to $800 million five-year credit facility; access to credit accretive capital sources (preferred equity, asset level financing, and structured equity); future debt to remainnon-recourse to Apache

Freed Up Capital

Altus Midstream to invest between $2.2 - $2.5 billion in aggregate facilities and joint venture pipeline projects throughout 2019-2021, freeing up Apache’s capital for our core exploration and production activities

Premium Market Connections

New third-party transportation pipelines to deliver Alpine High production to premium markets (including major hubs Waha, Mont Belvieu, Corpus Christi, Katy, and Agua Dulce), with substantial equity ownership options available

LOGO

During 2017, Apache completed its strategic exit from Canada, which was enabled by its Alpine High discovery. We believe this portfolio shift is a significant upgrade to Apache’s portfolio of assets, as the Alpine High discovery offers higher returns and significantly more long-term growth potential. Apache’s U.S. assets are complemented by itsour international assets in Egypt and the North Sea, each of which addsadded to its deep inventory of exploration and development opportunities and generatesin 2018. The significant free cash flowsflow in excess of current capital investments facilitating Apache’sgenerated by these two international regions has facilitated our ability to develop our assets in the Permian Basin, including Alpine High, while maintaining financial flexibility. In short, these key actions drive our long-term growth.

LOGO

Positioned for highly Strategically balanced and Focused on full-cycle, Disciplined financial competitive per share focused portfolio corporate-level returns approach growth rates Strong free cash flow Permian Basin / Alpine High Rigorous capital allocation Maintained dividend and generating assetsFor example, in Egypt, and driven production and cashwe have greatly expanded our acreage position through new concessions adjacent to our legacy acreage. We are in the process and disciplined credit rating, reduced debt,of acquiring state-of-the-art seismic data across more than 50 percent of our footprint in Egypt. In the North Sea, flow growth spending approach without issuing equity Top-tier Permian Basin Fund with internally Investment decisions based Low cost of entry yields higher position generated cash and some on fully-burdened economics Return on Capital Employed non-core asset saleswe

 

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

   3733 


In responseaccelerated initial production of the Garten discovery well, bringing the well online only seven months after its discovery and increasing Apache’s net production from the region to continued commodity price volatility, Apache also entered commodity derivatives to secure deploymentatwo-year high.

As a result of high priority investments without compromising the Company’s financial strength or flexibility. We continuously monitor changes inthese activities across our operating environment and have the ability, due to our dynamic capital allocation process, to adjust our capital investment program to levels that maximize value for our shareholders over the long-term.

Highlights of our operational, strategic, and financial achievements are provided below:regions, we had a strong year operationally:

 

2018 OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS

13%

Adjusted Production Growth

152%

Reserve Replacement

LOGOOur activities also resulted in a strong year of financial performance:

2018 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Exceeded Plan Target of 18%

CROIC

~ $1 billion

Capital Returned to Investors

(dividends, share repurchases, and debt reduction)

The Board and management will continue to take steps to position Apache for future success in the currentevery commodity price environment and to further our transition to becomingvision of being the premier exploration and production company, withcontributing to global assets focused on U.S. growth and anchoredprogress by helping meet the Permian Basin.world’s energy needs.

NEO Compensation

 

PERMIAN FOCUSED-GROWTH & ALPINE HIGH STRATEGIC EXIT FROM CANADA Top-tier Permian Basin position serves as Apache’s Completed strategic exit from Canada in August foundationThe compensation structure for long-term growth 2017 Increasing capital spending towards Permian development, Sale streamlines portfolioour CEO and positively impacts utilizing free cash flow generating assets in EgyptPresident and the financial metrics; accretive to 2017 EPSother NEOs is specifically designed so that a large portion of their compensation directly aligns their interests with those of our shareholders:

LOGOLOGO

As shown in the chart above for the CEO and cash North Sea margins In September 2016, Apache announced discoveryPresident,78 percent of Alpine Proceedshis 2018 target compensation was long-term (equity-based), and90 percent of ~$706M will be used to reduce debt High –340,000 contiguous net acres with 5 distincthis 2018 target compensation wasat-risk, the value of which is determined by a combination of company, individual, and improve overall liquidity hydrocarbon-bearing formations and 5,000+ drilling locations Strong progress at Alpine Highstock price performance. For the other NEOs in 2017: Shifting portfolio focus to higher-growth Permian assets: Months First sales 2 months Current 4Q17A Production Mix vs. 2 Ahead ahead of schedule Projected 4Q18E Production Mix (ex-Canada) Drilled 45 wells, including key 45 concept tests wells to verify our Permian / 49% Permian / 54% understanding of the play Other U.S. / 12% Other U.S. / 12% Int’l / 39% Int’l / 34% EXCEEDED Exceeded both June and TARGETS September 2017 production targets OPERATIONAL Average liquids and natural gas production across operations 457 Mboe/d Mboe/d = thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day Crude oil represented 53aggregate, 69 percent of total liquids production Initiated first sales at Alpine High and ramped to 25,000 boe/d at year end 11% / 26% / 15% Outperformed targets in key health, safety, security, and environmental goals Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR), Days Away, Restricted or Transferred Rate (DART)their 2018 target compensation was long-term (equity-based), and Vehicle Incident Rate (VIR), respectively 124% Reserve replacement rate 230 MMboe83 percent of total proved reserves added in 2017 STRATEGIC 5,000+ Increased Alpine High location count to 5,000+ future drilling 340,000 net contiguous acres in the southern portion of the Delaware Basin locations Exited Canada Proceeds funded construction of our buildout of key infrastructure at Alpine High FINANCIAL $ Aggregate proceeds raised from non-core asset/acreage sales 1.4 billion Eliminated $818 million in future asset retirement obligations Year-end liquidity, which includes: $5.2 billion $3.5 billion in undrawn credit facility and $1.7 billion in cash and cash equivalents Current credit facility matures in June 2020their 2018 target compensation wasat-risk.

 

 3834   

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement


Sustained Focus on Long-Term Value CreationThe CEO and President’s base salary, target bonus, and target equity were held flat in 2018 and 2019. His year-over-year change primarily relates to the valuation method used for the performance shares (Monte Carlo). Year-over-year changes for the other NEOs reflect market adjustments related to the specific role as well as the effect of the equity valuation. For all NEOs, annual incentive compensation payouts reflect a higher corporate achievement factor in 2018 compared to 2017:

 

  Named Executive Officer 

Base
Salary

($)

  

Annual
Incentive
Earned

($)

  

Perf.
Share

($)

  

RSUs

($)

  

Stock
Options

($)

  

2018 Total
Direct Pay

($)

  

2017 Total
Direct Pay

($)

  

Year-Over-  

Year Change  
(%)  

John J. Christmann IV

 

 

1,300,000

 

 

 

2,327,130

 

 

 

5,780,082

 

 

 

3,708,216

 

 

 

1,589,243

 

 

 

14,704,672

 

 

 

13,812,383

 

 

 

6.5

 

Stephen J. Riney

 

 

725,000

 

 

 

998,325

 

 

 

2,096,238

 

 

 

1,344,838

 

 

 

576,365

 

 

 

5,740,766

 

 

 

5,425,841

 

 

 

5.8

 

P. Anthony Lannie

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

743,580

 

 

 

1,472,950

 

 

 

944,973

 

 

 

404,994

 

 

 

4,241,496

 

 

 

3,619,985

 

 

 

17.2

 

Timothy J. Sullivan

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

688,500

 

 

 

1,193,364

 

 

 

765,584

 

 

 

328,119

 

 

 

3,600,567

 

 

 

3,336,833

 

 

 

7.9

 

Grady L. Ables

 

 

575,000

 

 

 

593,831

 

 

 

1,035,144

 

 

 

758,966

 

 

 

189,741

 

 

 

3,152,683

 

 

 

2,818,364

 

 

 

11.9

 

Reported Pay vs Realized Pay

A significant portion of the CEO and President’s compensation is long-term and equity-based. As a result, the amount shown in the table above is not the same as his realized pay. Realized pay is defined as base salary, earned bonus, all other compensation as reported in the summary compensation table, and equity that vested that year valued as of the vesting date:

 

  Year  Reported
Pay
   Realized
Pay
   Difference   

2015

  

$

15,139,831

 

  

$

4,203,485

 

  

 

-72.2%  

 

2016

  

$

13,416,196

 

  

$

6,670,753

 

  

 

-50.3%  

 

2017

  

$

14,433,373

 

  

$

8,916,797

 

  

 

-38.2%  

 

2018

  

$

15,201,447

 

  

$

10,178,741

 

  

 

-33.0%  

 

Total Difference

 

  

 

-48.5%  

 

Apache’s strategic transformationThe CEO and repositioningPresident’s realized total pay during his four-year tenure is 48.5 percent lower than his reported pay during that time periodaveraging $7.4 million per year. This is the result of its business sincea combination of lower stock price, underwater stock options, and performance-based equity awards that were either forfeited or earned at or below target, specifically with respect to programs that vested during the period 2015 illustrates Apache’s long-term commitment to shareholder value creation. Over such period, Apache strengthened its:2018. For example, payout of the performance share programs has averaged 67.5 percent (zero for 2012-2014, 70 percent for 2013-2015, and 100 percent for each of 2014-2016 and 2015-2017).

 

Realized Pay vs Stock Price Performance

Though we do not like to see realized pay fall below reported pay because that necessarily means our stock is underperforming, the compensation program is working as intended:

u

Financial Discipline2015-2018: by aligning capital spend with cash flow, reducing debt and protecting investment grade credit rating, and sustaining the dividend and not issuing equity;Realized pay of-48.5 percent vs stock price performance of-58.1 percent, excluding dividends

 

u

2018:Realized pay of-33.0 percent vs stock price performance of-37.8 percent, excluding dividends

Portfolio by exiting Australia,

There is pay for performance alignment between our compensation program and our shareholders’ experience, as designed. To reinforce this alignment, we have increased the LNG business, Canada,CEO and othernon-core assets, shifting focusPresident’s stock ownership requirement to the Permian and unlocked value opportunities, and leasing and discovering the enormous resource play at Alpine High; and10x his base salary. For a discussion of actual pay versus stock price performance, see page 52.

u

Returns Focus by redesigning incentive compensation metrics, implementing a centralized capital allocation process and utilizing fully burdened economics, and deemphasizing production growth, while focusing on cost alignment.

Since the commencement of our strategic transformation in 2015, management and the Board have taken significant action to help drive long-term value creation:

LOGO

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

The compensation structure for our chief executive officer and president is specifically designed so that a large portion of his compensation directly aligns his interests with those of our shareholders.

u

76 percent of Mr. Christmann’s 2017 compensation was long-term and equity-based, the ultimate value of which is related directly to common stock performance.

u

87 percent of his 2017 total compensation was variable, the value of which is determined by a combination of company, individual, and stock price performance.

LOGO

$7.8 billion $2.7 billion $1.1 billion NO Total asset sales 2015-2017 Total Debt Reduction 2015—2017 Total Dividends 2015-2017 Equity issuances 2015-2017 Eliminated approximately Debt reduction from Approximate average No equity issuances, $1.3 billion in future asset December 31, 2014 to dividend yield of 2% thus no shareholder retirement obligations December 31, 2017 over such period dilution from those sales Compensation creates direct alignment with our shareholders of total 2017 CEO compensation of target 2017 CEO compensation is was linked to metrics assessing 76% in long-term equity-based awards 87% company, stock or individual performance

 

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

   3935 


Our Approach to Pay

Our approach to compensation takes into account external market and internal parity concerns as well as recruitment, retention, and long-term performance goals, which drive shareholder value.

Our Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation philosophy is to design compensation programs that:

Attract, retain, and reward top talent;

Align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by paying for performance; and

Provide a substantial portion of our compensation in long-term equity-based compensation to reward performance over the long-term and align the compensation of our top executives with the shareholder experience.

Peer Groups and Data

Peer group data contributes to our external market parity, recruitment, retention, and performance analysis. To assemble the right peer group, our MD&C Committee uses ten criteria, ranked in the following order:

u

Industry: companies with our6-digit GICS code (101020 – Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels)

u

Market Capitalization: companies+/-2.5x Apache’s market cap

u

Revenues: companies+/-2.5x Apache’s revenues

u

Assets: companies+/-2.5x Apache’s assets

u

United States headquarters

u

Compete with Apache for talent

u

List Apache as a peer in their 2017 proxy statement

u

List a peer of Apache as a peer in their 2017 proxy statement

u

Considered an Apache peer by Institutional Shareholder Services

u

Considered an Apache peer by Glass Lewis

The MD&C Committee believes that, in combination, the above criteria generate a tailored peer group that reflects the size and complexity of Apache’s business, as well as the labor market in which we compete for talent. Of the 11 companies included in Apache’s 2017 peer group, seven met all criteria and the remaining four met at least six of the criteria.

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Chesapeake Energy Corporation

ConocoPhillips

Devon Energy Corporation

EOG Resources, Inc.

Hess Corporation

Marathon Oil Company

Murphy Oil Corporation

Noble Energy, Inc.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Pioneer Natural Resources Company

LOGO

Chart includes data reviewed by the MD&C Committee when confirming Apache’s peer group for 2017. Specifically, the chart reflects Apache’s and, with respect to the peer group, the peer group’s median (the “Peer Median”) (i) average market capitalization over the 12 months ended November 15, 2016, (ii) aggregate revenue as reported in the Exchange Act reports filed during the 12 months ended November 15, 2016, and (iii) assets as reported in the most recent Exchange Act report filed on or before November 15, 2016.

We also relied on this peer group for the relative TSR measurement within our 2017 Performance Share program.

In addition to the data gathered from the peers above, we use (i) the most recent compensation data provided by our Consultant (defined below), (ii) industrysize-based surveys, and (iii) our own labor market data.

In reviewing the 2018 peer group, and after considering all of the inputs described above, the MD&C Committee has determined that the 2017 peer group remains appropriate and will be used for 2018.

40

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


Elements of the 20172018 Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program primarily consists of base salary, annual incentive compensation, and long-term incentive compensation.

Base Salary

 

 

The base salaries of our NEOs were not changed in 2018. The only increase to the base salary of our CEO and President during his tenure in the role (2015 to the present) occurred following the September 2016 announcement of the Alpine High discovery.

2018 BASE SALARY

  Named Executive Officer

January 1, 2018

Salary

($)

December 31, 2018  

Salary  

($)  

  John J. Christmann IV

1,300,000

No Change  

  Stephen J. Riney

725,000

No Change  

  P. Anthony Lannie

675,000

No Change  

  Timothy J. Sullivan

625,000

No Change  

  Grady L. Ables

575,000No Change  

Our abilitybase salary program is designed to help us recruit and retain executive talent depends on setting competitivewith experience in oil and gas E&P companies operating in the United States and internationally. We review base salaries. salaries annually, unless circumstances require a more frequent review.

We begin with an analysis of base pay relative to the market. We target base pay at peer median and then evaluate the need to make any adjustments based on vertical variables such as pay parity relative to other officers and internal accountability. We review base salaries annually as a whole and individually every 12 months, unless circumstances require otherwise.For all officers, we solicit input from our independent compensation consultant. Fornon-CEO NEO salaries, we also solicit input from our CEO input. Base salaries for all NEOs were frozen throughout 2017.and President.

  Named Executive Officer  

2017

Earnings
($)

   

January 1, 2017

Salary

($)

   

December 31, 2017  

Salary  

($)  

 

  John J. Christmann IV

   1,300,000    1,300,000    1,300,000   

  Stephen J. Riney

   725,000    725,000    725,000   

  P. Anthony Lannie

   675,000    675,000    675,000   

  W. Kregg Olson

   625,000    625,000    625,000   

  Timothy J. Sullivan

   625,000    625,000    625,000   

Annual Cash Incentive BonusCompensation

 

 

Our annual cash incentive compensation plan is designed to motivate and reward executives forour NEOs and employees to create long-term value by achieving key business objectives that continue to drive Apache’s success and generate returns for our shareholders.objectives. We set annual cash incentive bonuscompensation targets hierarchically starting with a multiple of base salary. Actual annual bonus payouts are based on ourthe achievement of a variety of operational and strategic objectives (“the corporategoals (the “corporate performance element”), each officer’s individual achievement and impact (“the individual(the “individual performance element”), and any needed exceptional adjustments.

Corporate Performance Element

Our corporate objectives represent our key operational and strategic goals for the year, each weighted 50 percent.60 percent and 40 percent, respectively. The operational goals include the fundamental aspects of our business aimed to focus employee efforts on increasing production and reserves in a safe and environmentally responsible manner, while prudently managing costs. Beginning in 2018, operational goals also include a CROIC measure, weighted 20 percent in 2018 (increased to 25 percent in 2019).

The strategic goals, which comprise 40 percent of the annual incentive compensation plan, include a list of specific objectives designed to support the execution of our plan forplan. The MD&C Committee determined the particular year and to set upweighting of each goal based on its relative impact on the Company for future growth.Company’s long-term strategy.

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

41


Points attributed to each operational goal range from zero below threshold, 50 percent at threshold, 100 percent at target, and 200 percent at maximum, with interpolation for results between these ranges.threshold and target and between target and maximum. No points are awarded for achievement below threshold. Points attributed to each strategic goal range from zero to 200 percent at maximum, with target scored at 100 percent.

36

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


Based on the combined results of the operational and strategic goals, the MD&C Committee determines an achievement factor, which is then used to calculate each executive’sa corporate bonus pool. This year, in direct response to valuable shareholder feedback, the MD&C Committee introduced a comprehensive scorecard, detailing how each goal has been weighted and scored to arrive at the overall achievement factor.

2018 Business Rationale and Weighting for Each Goal

The goals in the Company’s 2018 annual incentive compensation plan are designed to align with our strategic focus, setting us up for long-term success. Our 2018 goals position the Company for long-term success by incentivizing safety and environmental responsibility, competitive returns, cash flow neutrality, returning value to shareholders, high impact exploration, production and reserves growth, leading technology, and a balanced portfolio:

 

OUR STRATEGIC FOCUS = OUR GOAL FOCUS

  Safety

  Returning value to investors

  High impact exploration

  Environmental responsibility

u   Dividend payments

  Production & reserves growth

  Competitive returns

u   Share repurchases

  Leading technology

  Cash flow neutrality

u   Debt reduction

  Balanced portfolio

In line with this overarching strategy, a number of our goals related to the recent Alpine High discovery in the Permian Basin. Alpine High represents substantial production and reserve growth potential. It is a large-scale, relatively early-stage “greenfield” project that requires significant capital investment. Because of the field’s location and potential, it is important for the Company to focus on achieving key milestones relating to the development of Alpine High. These include preparing a full-field development plan, building midstream assets to connect the field’s wells to multiple downstream markets, and sustaining free cash flow in the Company’s other operating regions, including Egypt and the North Sea, that can be used to fund the Alpine High project. For some time to come, Alpine High will have a direct impact on the value investors attribute to the Company’s stock price.

The development of a large discovery like Alpine High requires phased planning and implementation:

 

ALPINE HIGH DEVELOPMENT PHASES

2014-2016

2016-2017

2018

2019 & Beyond

Formulation and

confirmation of concept

Areal and vertical delineation

Optimization and transition

to full field development

Focused near-term

development and setting up

the long-term

u  Seismic acquisition and processing

u  Acreage acquisition

u  Exploration drilling

u  High-graded acreage position

u  Commenced infrastructure buildout

u  Extensive geologic and stratigraphic delineation

u  Multi-well drilling pads

u  Spacing, pattern, and completions tests

u  Investment in water handling facilities

u  Cryogenic processing plant site preparation and installation

u  Altus Midstream Company transaction

u  Volume ramp in rich (high energy content) gas

u  Economies of scale drive lifting cost efficiencies

u  Leverage water handling infrastructure

u  Margin uplift from cryogenic processing expected to commence 2H 2019

u  Preparing for rich gas and oil development

LOGO

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

37

2017 Corporate Objectives


With this backdrop in mind, the business rationale and Goal Rationaleweighting (shown in parentheses) for each 2018 operational goal is as follows:

 

 u  

ProductionCROIC of 399 Thousand Barrels of Oil Equivalent/Day (MBOED)18 Percent(20%):Production is one of the key drivers of value in our business. This measure is included in our annual cash incentive plan to ensure executives are E&P companies have historically focused on protecting and delivering base production and executingrevenue growth. However, the drilling program with maximum efficiencyinvestment community has requested a greater focus on competitive returns on capital from the entire E&P industry. Our CROIC metric emphasizes Apache’s focus on generating shareholder returns through disciplined capital management. This goal evaluates Apache’s cash flow from operations relative to average debt and a high well success rate.equity.

 

 u  

Replace 145 PercentHealth, Safety, Security, and Environmental(10%): As a core value, Apache is committed to providing a safe, secure, healthy, and environmentally responsible workplace. Programs such as our “Aim for Zero” initiative (a reference to zero incidents) and our aggressive reductions in methane emissions intensity and fresh water usage empower our employees to maintain a sustainable culture where everyone conducts business with minimal impact to the environment and returns home safely at the end of 2017 Production at $10.50 (Finding & Development cost/Barrels of Oil Equivalent (BOE)) through Exploration and Development Adds:This metric ensures efforts to replenish our reserve base continue to remain strong through excellence in exploration and well development while being conscious of our capital budget. 2017 represents the first year for which this goal includes a target focused on quality (Finding & Development cost/BOED) of reserves, in addition to quantity, further increasing its rigor.

u

Maximize Cash Flow per Barrel Sold through Cost Management:Aper-unit cash flow metric ensures maximum profitability from production operations through management of costs that are within our control. Cash Flow per Barrel Sold is impacted by lease operating expenses and general and administrative expenses.each day.

 

 u  

Achieve a Before Tax Rate of Return on 20172018 Drilling Program of 15 Percent:Percent(10%): Apache is in the business of drilling oil and gas wells. A return metric rewards the efficiency of capital allocation to profitable drilling activities. This goal is measured on a fully burdened basis and includes the cost of drilling, completion, facility,facilities, seismic, land, infrastructure, and all region and corporate overhead associated with the drilling program.

 

 u  

Health, Safety, Security,Maximize Cash Flow per Barrel Sold through Cost Management(5% for LOE; 5% for G&A): Aper-unit cash flow metric ensures maximum profitability from production operations through management of costs that are within our control. Cash flow per barrel sold is impacted by lease operating expenses (LOE) and Environmental:Apache is committed to ensuring it provides a safe workplacegeneral and instilling a culture of safety and environmental responsibility at every level of our organization. Programs such as our “Aim for Zero” initiative seek to empower our employees to maintain a sustainable culture where everyone returns home safely at the end of the day and conducts business with minimal impact to the environment.administrative expenses (G&A).

 

 u  

Strategic GoalsProduction of 391 Thousand Barrels of Oil Equivalent/Day(5%): Production is one of the key drivers of value in our business. This measure is included in our annual cash incentive plan to ensure executives focus on protecting and delivering base production and executing the drilling program with maximum efficiency and a high success rate.

u

Economic Reserve Replacement of 135 Percent of 2018 Production at $14.14(2.5% for Percent of Production; 2.5% for Finding & Development Cost/BOE): This metric ensures efforts to replenish our hydrocarbon reserve base through excellence in exploration and well development while being ever-mindful of our capital-spend discipline.

The business rationale andweighting (shown in parentheses) for each 2018 strategic goal is as follows:

u

Midstream – Develop a plan to optimize the structure of the Alpine High midstream assets to provide maximum benefit to shareholders(10%):Midstream assets relate to how we gather, process, transport, store, and market the full hydrocarbon value stream consisting of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. Building a midstream enterprise from the ground up requires billions of dollars in capital. In addition2018, it was critical that the Company develop a plan to safe,optimize the structure of our strategically located Alpine High midstream assets in a way that is both capital efficient and profitable operations, management was also tasked with a numberscalable, especially in light of important strategic goals to ensure we remain on track for future growth. Each strategic objective, as describedthe E&P industry’s substantial increase in hydrocarbon production in the table below, was chosen because it represents an important componentDelaware Basin of competitive advantage for Apache.Texas and, more broadly, the Permian Basin.

u

Returns – Implement amulti-year plan to attain and sustaindouble-digit ROCE while also growing the value of Apache and thelong-term cash distribution capacity for shareholders(8%):While Apache’s 2018 plan includes a positive CROIC and a positive ROCE, we included this strategic goal so that we could, for the first time, have a clear view to generating competitive ROCE down to the asset (well) level in each of our operating regions across the Company. This direct line of sight helps the Company better measure each business opportunity, whether it be drilling a new well or purchasing a new oil and gas lease, as a competitive investment and returns-focused proposition.

u

Alpine High – Clearly demonstrate Apache’s ability to executefull-field development at Alpine High in a highly economic manner(8%): Alpine High is a complex, unconventional (source rock) discovery in Reeves County, Texas. Before developing this vast resource, we have had to test and delineate multiple hydrocarbon-bearing zones in order to optimize well spacing, completion methods, water usage and storage, and location of facilities such as pipelines, processing units, and service roads.

38

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


u

Portfolio – Actively assess and manage asset portfolio utilizing thelong-term view of our integrated planning mode(5%):Apache seeks to maintain a balanced – and continuously refreshed – portfolio while focusing capital on the Company’s highest quality assets. As illustrated below, assets in our balanced portfolio move through various development phases, each accompanied by different levels of returns and costs:

MOVING ASSETS THROUGH OUR BALANCED PORTFOLIO

LOGO

Active portfolio management is a primary contributor to value creation in our business and demonstrates to investors the progress made toward the Company’slong-term strategic plan and investment proposition. For example, in 2017 we divested our Canada region, and within one year of that divestment we replaced our Canadian volumes with higher quality and lower cost production from Alpine High. Because of the value that can be achieved through active portfolio management, we have invested in long-term modeling tools that expand our capabilities.

Proactively balancing our portfolio and optimizing the timing of dispositions and leasing initiatives creates meaningful incremental value and, in our view, must be incentivized and rewarded as part of our compensation program.

u

Cash Flow – Sustain free cash flow capacity from Egypt and the North Sea(5%): Strong cash flow from our international regions helps to fund the buildout of Alpine High and our other global exploration programs, including our exploration program in offshore Suriname, without requiring us to issue additional debt or equity. The cash flow and returns profiles of Egypt and the North Sea benefit from the exposure to premium Brent crude oil pricing and higher realizations for natural gas and natural gas liquids. Strong, sustained free cash flow from Egypt and the North Sea also positively influences our asset valuation and underscores the Company’s strong belief in maintaining fiscal and capital discipline.

u

Technology – Develop energy technology strategies that advance Apache’s engineering, geoscience, and operational capabilities and efficiencies(4%): Achieving and maintaining premier performance in terms of costs, productivity, and capital efficiency in the rapidly evolving world of unconventional (and conventional) exploration and production requires atop-down energy technology strategy and dedicated resources and focus. We saw an opportunity in 2018 to incentivize strategies that will advance our development and use of transformational, cutting-edge technology.

While we classify these goals as strategic, they are not all discretionary or subjective in nature. We have increased the proportion of the annual incentive compensation plan that is tied to quantitative goals. Along with the new CROIC goal, which comprises 20 percent of the 2018 program, three of our six 2018 strategic goals comprise 23 percent of the total target award. These three strategic goals are quantitative in that they relate directly to financial performance against ourpre-set corporate plan (ROCE and free cash flow) or are clearly accomplished or not (creating a midstream optimization plan). The remaining three goals, comprising 17 percent of the total target award, are based on the MD&C Committee’s subjective yet judicious assessment of performance against the objective, in the context of the Company’s long-term

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

39


strategy. The goal composition for the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan can be illustrated in three ways, as follows:

LOGO

How ourWe Establish Our Targets are Established

Targets are set at the beginning of the year based on our “Plan”, orpre-set corporate plan, which represents our expectations for the year. We use abottom-up approach to develop our Plan, based on cost estimatesplan, using data submitted from each operating region and department. Because we operateconduct business in aan industry that is driven by volatile commodity price-driven business,prices, our Plan year-over-yearplan is adjustedreviewed regularly so that we are able to adapt our operations to changing conditions as necessary. The plan is in line with our strategy in the given environment. Our strategy for 2017 was to delivertop-tier returns by maximizing recovery and minimizing costs through continuous improvement.strategic focus. To execute on this strategy, the targets for our targetsoperational goals were set aggressivelyrigorously as follows:

 

 u  

Production, reserve replacement, and rate of return on drilling program targets were set at or above Planplan to align with our capital budget and focus on projects that wereare economic in the depresseda low commodity price environment.

 

Operational Strategic Goals Goals 50% 50%

42

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


 u  

Lease Operating Expense (LOE)LOE and General and Administrative (G&A)G&A per BOEbarrel of oil equivalent (BOE) targets were established at Plan for 2017,plan, based on adjusted production.production and anticipated third party costs for drilling rigs and other services.

 

 u  

We raised the bar on our HSSE measures by establishing each target atmeasures. This includes a meaningful assessment of the top quartile of our industry peers.progress we are making in reducing methane emissions intensity and fresh water usage. We also expanded HSSE goals to includeengage in a comprehensive qualitative assessment of leading and lagging measures in order to drive excellence in facets of HSSE beyond safety.safety, to include health, security, and the environment.

All 2018 goal targets were set above 2017 actual results. The 2018 targets related to cost (F&D/BOE, LOE/BOE, and G&A/BOE) were set higher than our 2017 results primarily due to the planning price environment in 2018 versus the 2017 actual price environment. In 2017, we used an average West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil price of $51 versus a 2018 plan WTI price of $58. The 2018 plan assumed the impact on costs from this higher price environment, which drove the cost targets higher than 2017 actual results.

How We Assessed 2018 Annual Cash Incentive BonusCompensation Achievement

The MD&C Committee was directly involved in setting the 2018 goals. Once the goals were set, the MD&C Committee received updates from management regarding goal achievement at each regularly scheduled meeting throughout the year. The MD&C Committee was therefore able to monitor progress, ask questions, and challenge assumptions. Atyear-end, the MD&C Committee received a vast amount of information concerning each goal. The internal process is fully transparent.

The operational goals are based on hard data as reflected in the Company’s financials, except that the HSSE goal also has an important overarching qualitative element to it that can result in upward or downward adjustment. Three of the strategic goals are quantitative, and three are qualitative. We highlight below the key data and considerations that resulted in our scorecard for the 2018 annual incentive compensation achievement.

40

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


In 2017, the results of2018, our corporate objectivesoperational goals yielded the following results:

 

Corporate Objectives – 2017 Corporate Goals Weighting Result Achievement Total Points
Operational Goals            

1. Production of 399 Thousand Barrels of Oil Equivalent/Day (MBOED)

 10% 381 MBOED Between threshold and target 6

2. Replace 145% of 2017 Production at $10.50 (Finding & Development cost/BOE) through Exploration and Development Adds:

 10%   

· 145% of 2017 production

  124% Between threshold and target 3

· $10.50 Finding & Development cost per BOE

  $13.83 Below threshold 0

3. Maximize Cash Flow per Barrel Sold through Cost Management:

 10%   

· $9.91 LOE per BOE

  $10.07 Slightly below target 5

· $4.49 G&A per BOE (Gross G&A Spend/BOE)

  $4.64 Slightly below target 4

4. Achieve a Before Tax Rate of Return on 2017 Drilling Program of 15%(threshold of 10%)

 10% 6% Below threshold 0

5. Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental*

 10% Qualitatively

assessed

 All leading and lagging

measures were achieved*

 5
Strategic Goals            
The strategic goals for 2017 were set to continue to shift the focus of Apache’s portfolio to North America and consisted of various objectives such as: 50%  All strategic goals achieved
at or above target**
 80

· Formulate a robust development model for Alpine High to optimize long-term project economics while addressing product variation throughout the play, which requires: progressing geographic and stratigraphic delineation phase to an advanced stage identifying the areal extent of individual target intervals, conducting strategic testing to design pad and batch development operations, addressing leasehold retention requirements, and defining marketing alternatives.

    

· Return Permian Basin oil production to a growth trajectory.

    

· Continue to advance market understanding of our strategy to sustain free cash flow capacity from Egypt and the North Sea.

    

· Deliver cash flow within the plan for 2017 while maintaining our credit rating.

    

· Actively assess and manage asset portfolio utilizing the long-term view of our integrated planning model.

    

Total Corporate Goal Achievement

 100%     103

  Operational Goals

 

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Results

  

Achievement

CROIC

 

 

15%

 

 

 

18%

 

 

 

21%

 

 

 

22%

 

 

Maximum

Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental

 

 

Details Below

 

 

Below Target

Production (Mboe/d)

 

 

367

 

 

 

391

 

 

 

414

 

 

 

395

 

 

    Between Target and Maximum    

Economic Reserve Replacement:

     

 Quantity (x% of production)

 

 

115%

 

 

 

135%

 

 

 

155%

 

 

 

152%

 

 

Between Target and Maximum

 Quality (F&D cost/BOE)

 

$

16.63

 

 

$

14.14

 

 

$

12.16

 

 

$

13.29

 

 

Between Target and Maximum

Maximize Cash Flow per Barrel Sold through Cost Management:

     

 LOE per BOE

 

$

11.22

 

 

$

10.20

 

 

$

9.18

 

 

$

10.41

 

 

Between Threshold and Target

 G&A per BOE (Cash G&A Spend/BOE)

 

$

5.25

 

 

$

4.77

 

 

$

4.30

 

 

$

4.38

 

 

Between Target and Maximum

Before Tax Rate of Return on 2018 Drilling Program

 

 

10%

 

 

 

15%

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

14.5%

 

 

Between Threshold and Target

* The MD&C Committee considered a substantial volume of quantitative and qualitative HSSE operationaldata in scoring the HSSE goal, is based onincluding the achievement of (i) the following leading measures: Leadership and Accountability (HSSE site visits), Contractor Management (audits; contractor engagements), Hazard Assessments (training; comprehensive assessments of top operational risk; high-potential incident reviews), Asset Integrity (critical equipment and facility inspections), and Compliance Assurance (management of change assessment; greenhouse gas management assessment; AIM for ZERO/STEP assessment; region security plan assessments) and (ii) the following lagging measures: Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR), Days Away Restricted Time (DART), Vehicle Incident Rate (VIR), Loss of Primary Containment (spills), and AIM for ZERO Days (incident free). The AIM for ZERO Days goal was the only goal that was not achieved at target (results were between threshold and target).following:

** We achieved the strategic goals as follows:

u

Environmental: The Company continues to reduce fresh water usage. For example, at Alpine High we did so by increasing the use of recycled(non-potable) water from 80 percent in 2017 to 90 percent in 2018. The recycled water is used for drilling and completing oil and gas wells. We also reduced methane emissions intensity, and remain on track to meet our ONE Future 2025 target. With enhanced technologies, we improved the accuracy of our greenhouse gas emissions measurements. Our spill count was 20 percent below target. We replaced high bleed devices, reduced manual unloading, and conducted leak detection and repair.

achieved significant milestones with Alpine High in 2017, including 92 drilled wells, 72 completed wells, 74 producing wells added, production exit rate of 25,000 BOE, water infrastructure – eight pits and 14 miles of gathering, five Central Processing Facilities commissioned on time and within budget (280 MMcf per day), 45 miles of30-inch residue line segments in service, North and South meter ties in service, 110 miles of gathering systems in service, Midstream operations team built, and fusion center for Midstream and Upstream built; completed delineation, initiated sales, and ramped up production at Alpine High (84 wells drilled, 11 intervals, commenced first sales in May 2017 increasing to 25,000 BOE per day in seven months, and constructed and installed 22 permanent Central Tank Batteries with three expansions); accomplished significant achievements on the Midstream installation in 2017 (five Mechanical Refrigeration Units providing 380 MMcf per day of capacity, 57 miles ofin-field gas, 22 miles of water, 25 miles of NGL pipeline, and 45 miles of high pressure residue line); and delivered first gas sales from Alpine High one month ahead of schedule;

We donated an additional 50,000 trees in partnership with 59non-profits, bringing our total to more than 4.6 million trees since program inception. We participated in wildlife habitat and wetland conservation projects, including on acreage we own, manage, and conserve along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana as one of that state’s largest private landowners.

returned Permian Basin oil production to a growth trajectory with an 18 percent increase from the second quarter 2017 to fourth quarter 2017, exceeding the planned growth;

u

Health and Security: Importantly, in 2018 we successfully maintained security for our workforce and facilities in Egypt and throughout the world. In our ongoing effort to promote wellness, we established a new health facility and wellness clinic in the Midland office,on-boarded new medical and wellness staff in Egypt, and conducted extensive crisis management and communications training, including oil spill response preparedness and corporate crisis drills relating to identified risks and appropriate mitigation measures.

expanded disclosures by including a quarterly cash flow statement by country, which was not previously available;

u

Safety: Our total recordable incident rate (TRIR) was 13 percent above target, but improved as the year progressed. Our days away restricted time (DART) was 23 percent above target. Our vehicle incident rate (VIR) was 10 percent above target. All were above threshold.

exceeded plan cash flows by $719 million in 2017, while maintaining Apache’s credit rating; and

While our employee rates with respect to these three lagging measures were quite good, our independent contractors did not perform as well, in part because of the number of persons now employed by contractors who are new to the industry. To address this issue, we increased management field visits (45 percent above target), conducted more contractor audits and engagements (41 percent above target), and implemented enhanced learning and training programs, operating procedures, and safety systems. We also introduced safety tools to better assess a contractor’s safety performance and qualifications against established criteria.

For employees and independent contractors alike, we want all workers to return home safely at the end of each day. Accordingly, despite outstanding environmental achievements and significant health, security, and safety accomplishments, the HSSE goal was scored below target.

 

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

41


In 2018, our strategic goals yielded the following results:

  Quantitative Strategic Goals

Weight

Achievement    

Midstream – Develop a plan to optimize the structure of the Alpine High midstream assets to provide maximum benefit to shareholders.

10.0

Maximum    

Returns– Implement a multi-year plan to attain and sustain double-digit ROCE while also growing the value of Apache and the long-term cash distribution capacity for shareholders.

8.0

At Target    

Cash Flow – Sustain free cash flow capacity from Egypt and the North Sea.

5.0

Maximum    

  Qualitative Strategic Goals

Weight

Achievement    

Alpine High – Clearly demonstrate Apache’s ability to execute full-field development at Alpine High in a highly economic manner.

8.0

Below Target    

Portfolio – Actively assess and manage asset portfolio utilizing the long-term view of our integrated planning model.

5.0

At Target    

Technology – Develop energy technology strategies that advance Apache’s engineering, geoscience and operational capabilities and efficiencies.

4.0

At Target    

The MD&C Committee considered a substantial volume of quantitative and qualitative data in scoring the strategic goals. This included the following factors, regarded by the MD&C Committee as most impactful:

u

Midstream:Apache not only developed a plan to optimize our midstream structure, but also attracted a level of investor interest that enabled the Company to execute the plan in 2018. Apache, together with third party investor Kayne Anderson, created Altus Midstream Company, a publicly-tradedC-corporation, which as of closing on November 9, 2018, assumed ownership of substantially all of the midstream assets related to Alpine High. Altus Midstream has the capacity to self-finance and is controlled by Apache, which at closing held a 79 percent ownership interest. The Altus Midstream transaction, completed despite a challenging IPO/business combination market, was a unique way for the Company to fund midstream obligations while maintaining operational control. The valuation of this entity upon inception was significantly higher than Apache’s historical Alpine High midstream asset investment. Along with executing the Altus Midstream transaction, Apache:

Increased total processing capacity at Alpine High.

Completed construction and installation of two compressor stations under budget at Alpine High.

Progressed on schedule with the construction of three cryogenic plants, which will significantly enhance the extraction and sale of high-value natural gas liquids at Alpine High.

Secured equity ownership options for Altus Midstream on five new third–party pipelines in West Texas that connect the Altus Midstream facilities – and therefore Alpine High upstream production – to major U.S. (and global) markets.

The MD&C Committee, whose members include two persons with substantial midstream business experience, determined that maximum achievement for this goal was warranted.

u

Returns:We identified and communicated region-level drivers of strong ROCE, including a focus on improved margins, capital efficiency, and portfolio optimization. As a result, ROCE for 2018 was significantly higher than the 2018 plan, due to higher production and lower costs, as well as strong commodity prices. The MD&C Committee reviewed 2018 outlook versus 2022 plan for ROCE, which is projected to improve over the next five years on a consolidated basis and for each of Permian, NAUR, Egypt, and the North Sea, in line with target for this strategic goal. This will help the Company maintain long-term cash distribution capacity.

u

Cash Flow: Total 2018 free cash flow from the international regions was $1.1 billion, compared to $890 million in 2017. This is approximately 15 percent higher than the 2018 corporate plan ($929 million). Free cash flow from both Egypt and the North Sea improved year-over-year, and both regions are well positioned to generate free cash flow under our current plan. For example, in Egypt we secured new concessions adjacent to our legacy acreage over which we are running state of the art seismic technology, and in the North Sea we announced a

42

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


new discovery (the Garten well). This goal would have been scored at target had cash flow equaled plan, and it would have been scored below target had cash flow been lower than plan.

u

Alpine High: With respect to this goal, in 2018 the Company demonstrated the economic viability of the rich gas play in Alpine High by proving substantial economic potential in key (proprietary) formations. This enables material rich gas development in 2019. We also created future development programs for this area through successful strategic testing and delineation results, and we advanced development programs across the region by driving well costs down and reducing lifting costs.

We began construction of three cryogenic units, which will further the economic potential of the rich gas play. Despite significant progress, the market has not yet fully embraced the value potential of Alpine High. As a result, the MD&C Committee scored this goal below target.

u

Portfolio:We have made significant improvements to our portfolio, driven by our overarching strategic repositioning from an “acquire and exploit” business model to one based on organic growth. The improvements include the following:

Houston (Midcontinent): Added inventory in a central Texas field throughlow-cost leasing efforts, near existing infrastructure.

North Sea: Connected a major new discovery (Garten) to market, whichde-risked similar prospects; divested isolated, capital intensive prospects.

LOGO

United States

Permian (Midland): Developed a robust and predictable development drilling program in the Midland Basin based on systematic landing zone and spacing tests;de-risked future locations across the basin.

LOGO

International

Egypt: Increased our footprint by 3.4 million acres and acquiredstate-of-the-art broadband 3D seismic across four distinct basins, resulting in additional inventory ahead of expectations.

NAUR (Alpine High): Implemented pad drilling, added landing zones, refined spacing patterns and completion designs, and increased drilling inventory and reserves.

Suriname: Conducted advanced seismic mapping and prospect generation in Blocks 53 and 58 that will result in at least one exploration well drilled in 2019.

In addition, we:

Explored the exit of certain funding-challenged projects, and divested other isolated and capital-intensive projects.

Expanded our exploration portfolio in the U.S., which will remain confidential for competitive reasons.

The management of our portfolio in 2018 fell in line with target for this goal, keeping the Company poised for long-term success with a deep, high-graded portfolio.

u

Technology: To hit target with respect to this strategic goal, the Company in 2018 transformed this space by:

Assessing, reorganizing, and consolidating technical and technological capabilities and functions across the various parts of the business to maximize efficiencies and leverage expertise.

Creating global technical working groups with subject matter leaders from across our central and regional functions to address key energy technology issues such as well spacing, completion optimization, and operations excellence, through implementation of best practices Company-wide.

Creating a dedicated data analytics team and engaging a leading energy data analytics expert.

Achieving proprietary advancements in data science and technology, which will remain confidential for competitive reasons.

Other Considerations

In formulating and assessing the annual incentive compensation plan, we consider whether the elements of the plan advance the Company’s long-term objectives. Further, in measuring achievement, we consider whether the Company’s

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

   43 


included a portfolio update, a five-yearlong-term strategy has been advanced, and to what degree. While share price performance is considered, our annual incentive compensation program is not an annual TSR program, and we remain focused on the drivers of long-term value creation.

During the MD&C Committee’s assessment of the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan and a detailedtwo-year plan inresults, the 2017 integrated planning model; more than doubled total risked resource year-over-year from 4,278 MMBOEMD&C Committee reviewed recent stock performance relative to 8,980 MMBOE in the 2017 portfolio update (driven by increases at Alpine High and the Permian Basin) with 90 percent of inventory value in the top 10 resource plays; substantially enhanced decision-making for allocating capital in the five-year plan in order to drive value and improve returns; utilized the integrated planning model to establish capital funding guidance at the resource play level for 2017West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil pricing and 2018 with resource play level funding then rolled up to region level; utilized the integrated planning model to approve/reject incremental capital requests and to high grade Apache’s activity set, with a focus on increasing long-term returns and value, and generating opportunities for asset rationalization; and executed the Canada divestment.TSR peers.

The total 2017 achievement of the corporate performance element ranged from 88 percent to 118 percent due to variability in the attainment of the HSSE and strategic objective components. The MD&C Committee determinedobserved that for the period May 30, 2018 through October 9, 2018, Apache began to awardoutperform peers. During this period, the corporateCompany announced solid quarterly results and the Altus Midstream transaction with Kayne Anderson:

LOGO

News regarding an increase in global crude oil supply interrupted the climb frommid-October throughyear-end 2018, a period in which Apache underperformed generally in line with a significant drop in WTI crude oil pricing. Apache’s peers also underperformed, though on average they fared somewhat better than Apache during this two andone-half month stretch. At the start of the year, however, Apache again started to outperform peers through February 4, 2019:

LOGO

During its meeting on February 6, 2019, the MD&C Committee considered this market data and the Company’s stock performance element undergenerally as additional context in reviewing the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan.

44

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


Our Scorecard for 2018 Annual Incentive Compensation

After a comprehensive evaluation of the results as described in detail above, the MD&C Committee completed a scorecard resulting in the annual cash incentive program at 95scoring 137.7 percent of target which included an eight percent discretionary reduction from the calculated achievement of 103 percent. This was at the lower end of the 88 percent to 118 percent range actually achieved, due to underperformance of our operational goals and to better align outcomes with the decline in our stock price during 2017.as follows:

 

THE MD&C COMMITTEE’S FINAL SCORECARD

2018 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan

 
  Goal  

Target

(Weight)

   Score  

CROIC

   20.0      40.0  

Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental

   10.0      7.5  

Production (Mboe/d)

   5.0      5.9  

Economic Reserve Replacement:

    

·  Quantity (x% of production)

   2.5      4.6  

·  Quality (F&D cost/BOE)

   2.5      3.6  

Maximize Cash Flow per Barrel Sold through Cost Management:

    

· LOE per BOE

   5.0      4.5  

· G&A per BOE (Cash G&A Spend/BOE)

   5.0      9.1  

Before Tax Rate of Return on 2018 Drilling Program

   10.0      9.5  
   

Operational Goal Achievement

 

   

 

60.0  

 

 

 

   

 

84.7 

 

 

 

Midstream — Develop a plan to optimize the structure of the Alpine High midstream assets to provide maximum benefit to shareholders.

   10.0      20.0  

Returns — Implement a multi-year plan to attain and sustain double-digit ROCE while also growing the value of Apache and the long-term cash distribution capacity for shareholders.

   8.0      8.0  

Cash Flow — Sustain free cash flow capacity from Egypt and the North Sea.

   5.0      10.0  

Alpine High — Clearly demonstrate Apache’s ability to execute full-field development at Alpine High in a highly economic manner.

   8.0      6.0  

Portfolio — Actively assess and manage asset portfolio utilizing the long-term view of our integrated planning model.

   5.0      5.0  

Technology— Develop energy technology strategies that advance Apache’s engineering, geoscience and operational capabilities and efficiencies.

   4.0      4.0  
   

Strategic Goal Achievement

 

   

 

40.0  

 

 

 

   

 

53.0 

 

 

 

Total Achievement

 

   

 

100.0  

 

 

 

   

 

137.7 

 

 

 

Individual Performance Element

Using the corporate objectives as a foundation, the MD&C Committee receives input from the CEO and President for officersall other than the CEOofficers and assesses the bonus poolannual incentive compensation target for each executive against market conditions. Where needed, the MD&C Committee further tailors an executive’s annual cash incentive bonuscompensation to thetheir responsibilities and performance, of such executive, suchthe executive’s impact on 20172018 results, and internal alignment.

Our CEO and President evaluates region and corporate officers based on these same criteria, plusand includes an assessment of region and corporate department goals and performance as partperformance. Our independent compensation consultant is involved in the determination of those officers’ bonus assessments.targets and recommended awards for all officers. It is a rigorous process, with multiple checks and balances. With respect to the NEOs and all other executive officers, the MD&C Committee makes the final call, subject to providing a report of the MD&C Committee’s actions to the full Board of Directors.

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

45


Annual Cash Incentive BonusesCompensation Awarded for 20172018

The CEO’sCEO and President’s annual cash incentive bonuscompensation award is determined by the MD&C Committee and recommended to the Board for approval. The MD&C Committee accepted the CEO’sCEO and President’s recommendation with respect to the annual cash incentive bonusescompensation awards for the other NEOs. The annual cash incentive bonusescompensation awarded to the NEOs for 20172018 were:

 

Name    

2017 Target Bonus

(%)

    

2017 Target Bonus

($)

    

2017 Annual Cash

Incentive Bonus

($)

    

Bonus as  
Percent  

of Target  

(%)  

Named Executive Officer

  

2018 Target
Annual
Incentive
Compensation
(%)

 

  

2018 Target
Annual
Incentive
Compensation
($)

 

  

2018 Actual
Annual
Incentive
Compensation
($)

 

  

 Actual as Percent 
of Target
(%)

 

John J. Christmann IV

     130     1,690,000     1,605,500    95   

 

 

 

130

 

   

 

 

 

1,690,000

 

   

 

 

 

2,327,130

 

   

 

 

 

137.7

 

Stephen J. Riney

     100     725,000     688,750    95   100   725,000   998,325   137.7

P. Anthony Lannie

     80     540,000     513,000    95   80   540,000   743,580   137.7

W. Kregg Olson

     80     500,000     460,000    92

Timothy J. Sullivan

     80     500,000     460,000    92   80   500,000   688,500   137.7

Grady L. Ables

   

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

431,250

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

593,831

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

137.7

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

 

 

Our long-term incentive compensation plan is intended to align the long-term interests of our NEOs and employees with the long-term interests of our shareholders. We make long-term, equity-based compensation available to substantially all of our employees to promoteinstill a Company-wide ethicsense of ownership, innovation, and entrepreneurialism. Consistent withentrepreneurialism throughout the awards made in 2016, weorganization. We utilized a portfolio approach to our awards for 20172018 comprising performance shares, RSUs,restricted stock units (RSUs), and stock options. For the majority of the NEOs, the 20172018 long-term compensation awards were based 50 percent in performance shares, 35 percent in RSUs, and 15 percent in options. The awards for Mr. Ables were based 50 percent in performance shares, 40 percent in RSUs, and 10 percent in stock options. Our long-term incentive compensation plan has retentive value, with specific stock ownership and retention requirements for all officers.

Performance Shares

The performance share program was designed to align executive pay with achievement of operational and financial metrics that are the most impactful to the shareholders. For this reason, these awards comprise the largest portion of our long-term incentive awards (50 percent in the 2018 plan, increased to 55 percent in the 2019 plan). Our program incorporates both relative and absolute metrics to provide a more comprehensive and balanced evaluation of our long-term business performance. Performance shares target a percentage of base salary.

 

 4446   

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement


target a percentage of base salary; are tied to our performance over three-year periods; andPerformance shares vest (if achievement warrants and the executive remains employed by the Company) 50 percent at the end of the three-year performance period, with the remaining 50 percent vesting one year later. The shares are subject to similar double-trigger requirements as our otherchange-in-control provisions. TheFor the 2018 program, the shares are based on three different measures of performance:

 

 

2018 Performance Shares

 

    
Relative TSR   50%   

 

u Measured relative to our 11 peer companies over a rolling three-year period

u No payout for bottom quartile performance

u Maximum performance payout is 2.0x the target award

 

    

 

Cash Flow from

Operations

 

   25%   

 

u Evaluated annually during a three-year performance period against performance targets set at the beginning of the year

u Average performance over the three-year period is measured as a percentage above or below target

u Threshold payout of 50 percent achieved at 10 percent below the target, and the maximum payout of 200 percent is achieved at 10 percent above target

 

   

 

Reserve Adds per

Debt Adjusted

Share

 

   25%  

These awards are eligible for dividend equivalents that accumulate during the performance period (if dividends are declared and paid by the Company during such period), subject to the resulting performance multiple. Dividends will be paid in cash following the end of the performance period based on the same vesting schedule as the underlying awards, if a payout is warranted, or forfeited, if the underlying awards are forfeited.

Our 2019 performance share program has a new long-term return measure (CROIC) that replaces the cash flow from operations and reserve adds per debt adjusted share measures:

2019 Performance Shares

Relative TSR50%

u Measured relative to a new TSR Performance Peer Group over a rolling three-year period

u Balanced payout scale

u Maximum performance payout is 2.0x the target award

u New cap at 1x target if absolute TSR is negative

NEW

Cash Return on Invested Capital

(CROIC)

50%

u Measured over a three-year period against a target that is set at the beginning of the period

u Threshold payout of 50 percent achieved at 21 percent below the target, and the maximum payout of 200 percent is achieved at 21 percent above target

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

47


Relative TSR (50 Percent)

To maintain our focus on total shareholder return, half of the measure of performance for the 20172018 Performance Share program is based on relative TSR performance. OurIn the 2018 performance share program, our TSR performance iswas measured relative to our 11eleven peer companies over a rolling three-year period, and there is no payout for being in the bottom quartile:period:

 

TSR Rank

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Payout

 2.0 2.0 1.75 1.5 1.25 1.0 .80 .60 .40 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00

Payouts and potential results under the relative TSR component of our Performance Shareperformance share program closely align with our ability to create long-term shareholder value and directly reflect challenging stock price performance in 2017.2018. As of December 31, 2017,2018, and using the average per share closing price for the month of December immediately preceding the beginning and end of the performance period to calculate the beginning and end prices, Apache ranked:ranks 11th in the 2017 performance share program (two year results) and 10th in the 2018 performance share program (one year results), which would result in a zero payout for the TSR portion of the program.

u

11th in its peer group for the year-one results of the TSR portion of the 2017 Performance Share program, which would not have resulted in a payout;

u

9th in its peer group for the year-two results of the TSR portion of the 2016 Performance Share program, which would have resulted in a 0.40 payout; and

u

6th in its peer group for the year-three results of the TSR portion of the 2015 Performance Share program, resulting in a 1.10 payout.

Cash Flow from Operations and Reserve Adds per Debt Adjusted Share (25 percent each)

To provide a balance between market-based measures of performance (Relative(relative TSR) and internal financial and operational measures, Cash Flowcash flow from Operationsoperations and Reserve Addsreserve adds per Debt Adjusted Sharedebt adjusted share were retained in the 2017 Performance Share2018 performance share program. After an extensive analysis of performance measures,For the period, it was determined that the combination of these metrics most closely contributed to generating returns. We consider these two metrics the internal drivers of our absolute TSR performance.

These metrics are evaluated annually during a three-year performance period against respective performance targets determined at the beginning of each year.

Average performance over the three-year period is measured as a percentage

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

45


above or below target. The threshold payout of 50 percent is achieved at 10 percent below target, and the maximum payout of 200 percent is achieved at 10 percent above target. While weThis range around target was established at+/-10 percent as this percent represented the point at which a material change in execution of Apache’s plan would be required. As of December 31, 2018, results of the 2017 Performance Share Program were $2,748MM against a target of $2,724MM for cash flow from operations, and 0.56 against a target of 0.70 for reserve adds per debt adjusted share, and results of the 2018 Performance Share Program were $3,532MM against a target of $3,100MM for cash flow from operations, and 0.65 against a target of 0.58 for reserve adds per debt adjusted share.

We recognize that using a three-year average of annual periods for a long-term compensation program is uncommon,uncommon; however, this structure allowshas allowed us the ability to set more accurate targets in the current commodity price environment. ThisWe have said in prior years that this is not intended to be a long-term solution, but until prices stabilize,and indeed we feel this program design provideshave now replaced these measures with a more precisetrue long-term CROIC measure offor the 2019 performance of these two metrics throughout theshare program.

Performance share vesting and performance period.achievement to date

As of December 31, 2017,year-one2018, year-three overall results of the 2017 Performance Share program for Cash Flow from Operations and Reserve Adds per Debt Adjusted Share were $2,748 MM and .56 relative to their respective targets of $2,724 MM and 0.70. As of December 31, 2017,year-one results ofunder the 2016 Performance Share program for Cash Flow from Operationsresulted in a 100 percent payout. The TSR over the 2016 through 2018 performance period was negative 29.18 percent. With a ranking of tenth, the TSR performance metric achievement was zero. The financial and Reserve Adds per Debt Adjusted Shareoperational results were $2,300 MM and .33 relativeas follows:

  Performance Metric

 

  

 

Average

Variance

 

   

 

50%

Threshold

 

   

 

100%

Target

 

   

 

200%

Max

 

   

 

Achievement

of Target

 

 

 

Cash Flow from Operations ($MM)

 

  

 

 

 

 

23.09%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

-10%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

200%

 

 

 

 

 

Reserve Adds per Debt Adjusted Share

 

  

 

 

 

 

43.93%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

-10%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

200%

 

 

 

 

48

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


Accordingly, the overall achievement was determined as follows:

  Performance Metric

 

  

 

Achievement

of Target

 

   

 

50%

Threshold

 

   

 

100%

Target

 

 

 

Total Shareholder Return

 

  

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

50%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flow from Operations

 

  

 

 

 

 

200%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

50%

 

 

 

 

 

Reserve Adds per Debt Adjusted Share

 

  

 

 

 

 

200%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

50%

 

 

 

 

 

Overall Achievement

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

A cap applied to their respective targetsthe 2016 performance share program in the event of $1,500 MM and 0.14. As of December 31, 2017,year-one results ofnegative TSR, but did not come into play as the 2015 Performance Share program for Cash Flow from Operations and Reserve Adds per Debt Adjusted Share were $3,154 MM and .35 relative to their respective targets of $3,000 MM and 0.27.TSR rank among peers did not result in a payout.

As of December 31, 2017,2018,year-one overall results would have resulted in a 4272 percent payout under the 2017 Performance Share2018 performance share program had it been vested. As of December 31, 2017,2018,year-two overall results under the 2016 Performance Share program, which is similar to the 2017 performance share program would have resulted in a 10059 percent payout had it been vested. As of December 31, 2017, year-three overall results under the 2015 Performance Share program resulted in a 100 percent payout.

Restricted Stock Units

Our employees, including our NEOs, also receive RSUs. Generally, the RSUsRestricted stock units (RSUs) are granted to substantially all employees and vest ratably over three years. Grantees receive one share of common stock for eacha portion of the RSU award that vests.

The remaining portion of the RSUs are cash-based units under the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan and will be paid in cash once the RSU vests. The number and value of the performance shares and RSUs we granted to our NEOs in 20172018 are shown in the following chart:

 

       Performance Shares          RSUs 

  Name

  (#)   

Value*

($)

       (#)   

Value*

($)

 

  John J. Christmann IV

   83,754    5,609,424     58,628    3,708,221 

  Stephen J. Riney

   27,509    1,842,412     19,256    1,217,942 

  P. Anthony Lannie

   18,675    1,250,755     13,073    826,867 

  W. Kregg Olson

   17,292    1,158,132     12,104    765,578 

  Timothy J. Sullivan

   17,292    1,158,132        12,104    765,578 

* Values shown reflect the amounts in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. Note that the targeted grant date values of long-term compensation and the actual grant date values shown in these tables vary somewhat due to the prospective nature of targets. The amounts that will be realized by the NEOs from these awards may differ substantially from the grant date values.

 

46

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


   

    Performance Shares    

 

      

RSUs

 

 

  Named Executive Officer

 

  

(#)

 

   

Value*

($)

 

       

(#)

 

   

Value*

($)

 

 

 

  John J. Christmann IV

 

  

 

 

 

 

114,491

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

5,780,082

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

80,143

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,708,216

 

 

 

 

 

  Stephen J. Riney

 

  

 

 

 

 

41,522

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,096,238

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

29,065

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,344,838

 

 

 

 

 

  P. Anthony Lannie

 

  

 

 

 

 

29,176

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,472,950

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

20,423

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

944,973

 

 

 

 

 

  Timothy J. Sullivan

 

  

 

 

 

 

23,638

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,193,364

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

16,546

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

765,584

 

 

 

 

 

  Grady L. Ables

 

  

 

 

 

 

20,504

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,035,144

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

16,403

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

758,966

 

 

 

 

Stock Options

Generally, our stock options are granted to our executives based on a target percentage of base salary. Awards become exercisable ratably over three years and expire 10 years after grant. Stock options cannot be repriced, reset, or exchanged for cash if underwater without shareholder approval.

All stock options granted in the 10 years from 2009-2018 have zero value as of December 31, 2018, with strike prices ranging from $41.24 to $135.83. The number and value of stock options we granted to our NEOs in 20172018, based on a strike price of $46.27, are shown below:

  Named Executive Officer

 

  

Shares

(#)

 

   

Value*

($)

 

 

 

John J. Christmann IV

 

  

 

 

 

 

120,855

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,589,243

 

 

 

 

 

Stephen J. Riney

 

  

 

 

 

 

43,830

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

576,365

 

 

 

 

 

P. Anthony Lannie

 

  

 

 

 

 

30,798

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

404,994

 

 

 

 

 

Timothy J. Sullivan

 

  

 

 

 

 

24,952

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

328,119

 

 

 

 

 

Grady L. Ables

 

  

 

 

 

 

14,429

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

189,741

 

 

 

 

*Note: Values shown above reflect the amounts in the Grants of Plan-based Awards table. Note that the targeted grant date values of long-term compensation and the actual grant date values shown vary somewhat due to the prospective nature of targets. The amounts that will be realized by the NEOs from these awards may differ substantially from the grant date values.

 

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

49


LTI Grants in 2018

The 2018 long-term compensation awards were held flat from 2017 for the CEO and President, with minor increases driven by an increase in the following chart:Monte Carlo valuation of the performance share awards from the prior year. Mr. Riney, Mr. Lannie, and Mr. Ables experienced increases in their equity award values in 2018 ranging from six to 16 percent due to their base salary increases effective January 1, 2018, as the target value of our equity awards are based on a fixed multiple of salary.

 

Name  (#)   Value*  
($)  
 

Named Executive Officer

  

Perf. Shares

($)

 

   

RSUs

($)

 

   

Stock Options

($)

 

   

Total 2018 LTI

($)

 

   

Total 2017 LTI

($)

 

   

Change

(%)

 

 

John J. Christmann IV

   82,004    1,589,238     

 

 

 

 

5,780,082

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,708,216

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,589,243

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

11,077,541

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,906,883

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

Stephen J. Riney

   26,934    521,981     

 

 

 

 

2,096,238

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,344,838

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

576,365

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,017,441

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,582,334

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

 

P. Anthony Lannie

   18,285    354,363     

 

 

 

 

1,472,950

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

944,973

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

404,994

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,822,917

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,431,985

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

 

W. Kregg Olson

   16,931    328,123   

Timothy J. Sullivan

   16,931    328,123     

 

 

 

 

1,193,364

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

765,584

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

328,119

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,287,067

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,251,832

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

* Values shown reflect the amounts in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. Note that the targeted grant date values of long-term compensation and the actual grant date values shown in these tables vary somewhat due to the prospective nature of targets. The amounts that will be realized by the NEOs from these awards may differ substantially from the grant date values.

 

Grady L. Ables

  

 

 

 

 

1,035,144

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

758,966

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

189,741

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,983,851

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,868,359

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

 

Benefits

 

 

Our NEOs receive the standard benefits received by all employees, including: group health (medical, dental, pharmacy, and vision), group life, accidental death and dismemberment, business travel accident, disability plans, defined contribution retirement plans (a Money Purchase Retirement Plan and a 401(k) Savings Plan), paid family leave, and vacation.

General Executive Policies

As part of their total compensation, our NEOs are eligible for additional benefits that are designed to maintain market competitiveness. These include a comprehensive annual physical examination, an individual cash-value-based variable universal life insurance policy of two times base salary, an enhanced individual long-term disability policy for 75 percent of eligible earnings, and continued Apache and employee tax deferred contributions to anon-qualified retirement/savings plan once limits are reached in qualified retirement plans.

In 2017, Mr. Christmann’sour CEO and President’s enhanced life insurance benefit was reduced by 75 percent to better align with market practices.

Use of Property

Our operations are spread around the globe, including in locations that present a variety of physical andgeo-political risks. For both business efficiency and security reasons, we require the chief executive officer to use Apache’s aircraft for all air travel, unless good business judgment would require otherwise.

More details on the above benefits are presented under “All Other Compensation” following the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Elements of the 2019 Compensation Decisions With Respect to 2018

Program

Annually in December, the MD&C Committee receives executive compensation benchmarking data from our independent compensation consultant, Longnecker & Associates (the “Consultant”), to ensure market alignment with our peers. Additionally, our Board evaluates any feedback provided by shareholders regarding potential changes to our compensation program. After review of this information in 2017,2018, and in an effort to continually refine our compensation programs, the MD&C Committee made the following changes for 2018:2019:

2018

50

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


2019 Base Salary

There were no increases made to the

The base salary for our CEO and President remained flat for 2019. The base salaries of three other NEOs were adjusted in order to maintain market alignment:

2019 BASE SALARY 
  Named Executive Officer  

December 31, 2018

Salary ($)

   January 1, 2019
Salary ($)
   Percent
Change
 

 

John J. Christmann IV

  

 

 

 

1,300,000

 

 

  

 

 

 

No Change

 

 

  

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

Stephen J. Riney

   725,000    795,000    9.7% 

P. Anthony Lannie

   675,000    695,000    3.0% 

Timothy J. Sullivan

   625,000    No Change    0.0% 

Grady L. Ables

 

   

 

575,000

 

 

 

   

 

600,000

 

 

 

   

 

4.3%

 

 

 

2019 Annual Incentive Compensation

We increased the NEOsCROIC metric weighting in the annual incentive plan from 20 percent to 25 percent to continue to emphasize our focus on delivering shareholder returns.

In addition, because Apache recognizes the value of a diverse and inclusive work environment, we have added a strategic goal relating to diversity and inclusion in science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. This builds on the Company’s successful efforts more broadly since 2015 when the CEO and President stepped into the role, as exemplified by a 20 percent increase in the number of female employees as a share of Apache’s U.S.-based engineering and geoscience disciplines* and also by the following:

  WORKFORCE DEMOGRAPHICS

  Group

% Change as Share of Employees on 
Apache U.S. Payroll* 

Asian

+35% 

Black or African American

+11% 

Hispanic/Latino

+30% 

Overall

+27% 

*Data for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2018. As of year-end 2018, 748 employees on Apache’s U.S. payroll self-identified as belonging to an ethnic minority group.

2019 Long-Term Incentive Award Mix

We increased the weighting of long-term performance awards for all executives from 50 to 55 percent for 2019.

2019 Long-Term Compensation Awards

2019 Performance Share Program

The 2019 performance share program has two metrics, with a long-term CROIC metric replacing the 2018 givenmetrics (cash flow from operations and reserve adds per debt adjusted share). As described above, the close alignment to peer median within 2017 base salary levels and no significant changestwo measures in responsibilities amongst our NEOs.the 2019 program are:

u

Relative TSR weighted 50 percent

u

CROIC weighted 50 percent

 

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

   4751 


2018 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus

To better align with our strategy for 2018 and respond to feedback from our shareholders, we modified our annual cash incentive plan to (i) weight operational goals 40 percent, (ii) weight strategic goals 40 percent, and (iii) include a cash return on invested capital (CROIC) measure, weighted 20 percent. In addition, a new strategic goal has been included for 2018 related to double-digit ROCEThe CROIC metric was selected in order to emphasize our continuedApache’s focus on shareholder returns. It is a three-year measure, with target set at the beginning of the performance period, designed to incentivize the sustained generation of returns to shareholders over the long-term.

LOGO

2018 Long-Term Compensation Awards

2018 Performance Share Program

The 2018 Performance ShareAccordingly, the entire 2019 performance share program utilizes the same three metrics as the 2017 Performance Share program:

u

Relative TSR (weighted 50 percent)

u

Cash Flow from Operations (weighted 25 percent)

u

Reserve Adds per Debt Adjusted share (weighted 25 percent)

will be based on multi-year performance goals. For the relative TSR portion of the program, we will utilize the same 11new TSR performance peer companies andgroup, as described below under “2019 Peer Groups”, comprised of 17 peer companies. We will also utilize the following revised TSR ranking scale that were utilized in 2017:scale:

 

TSR Rank

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Payout

 2.0 2.0 1.75 1.5 1.25 1.0 .80 .60 .40 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.85 1.70 1.55 1.40 1.25 1.10 0.90 0.75 0.60 0.45 0.30 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00

These awards are eligible for dividend equivalents that accumulate during the performance period (if dividends are declared and paid by the Company during such period), subject to the resulting performance multiple. Dividends will be paid in cash following the end of the performance period, based on the same vesting schedule as the underlying awards, if a payout is warranted, or alternatively they will be forfeited if the underlying awards are forfeited.

The awards will vest 50 percent at the end of the three-year performance period, with the remaining 50 percent vesting one year later, andin the fourth year. They will be paid in cash. In addition, the awards include a 1x cap for the 50 percent TSR portion of the awards in the event Apache’s absolute TSR for the three-year performance period is negative. The cap augments the MD&C Committee’s negative discretion. The awards also allow continued vesting upon retirement after attaining age 55 and a certain combination of age and years of service, provided that such retirement occurs after the first three months of the performance period (and not before).

Stock Options and Altus Midstream Restricted Stock Units

We modified our 2018replaced stock option and RSU awards with RSUs tied to allow continued vesting upon retirement after attaining age 55 and a certain combinationthe stock of age and yearsAltus Midstream Company to ensure that the Company remains focused on the successful launch of service to better align with market practice. In addition, in respect of 2018 RSU awards, a portion of suchAltus Midstream, which is majority-owned by Apache. These awards are “Cash-Based Awards”cash-based units under the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan and shall(to be paid in cash once the RSU award vests.RSUs vest). The Altus Midstream RSUs comprise 10 percent of the 2019 long-term incentive compensation program.

2019 Stock Ownership Requirements

 

Operational Strategic Goals Goals 40% 40% CROIC 20%

The CEO and President holds the number of Apache shares that have vested during his tenure in the role. We therefore increased the stock ownership requirement of the CEO and President from 6x base salary to 10x base salary in order to ensure ongoing alignment with our shareholders’ interests. His actual pay, defined as base salary, earned bonus, all other compensation as reported in the summary compensation table, and equity that vested that year valued as of December 31, 2018, averages $5.7 million per year for the four-year period 2015 through 2018. This is 61.1 percent lower than his reported pay during that period, which is consistent with the stock price performance of -58.1 percent, excluding dividends, during that same period. This stock ownership change therefore reinforces the pay for performance alignment between our CEO and President and our shareholders. For a discussion of realized pay versus stock price performance, see page 35.

Decision-Making Process

Our Approach to Pay

Our approach to compensation takes into account external market and internal parity concerns as well as recruitment, retention, and long-term performance goals, which drive shareholder value.

Our Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation philosophy is to design compensation programs that:

Attract, retain, and reward top talent;

 

 4852   

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement


Align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by paying for performance; and

Decision-Making Process

Provide a substantial portion of our compensation in long-term, equity-based compensation to reward performance over the long-term and align the compensation of our top executives with the shareholder experience.

Peer Groups and Data

Peer group data contributes to our external market parity, recruitment, retention, and performance analysis. To assemble the right peer group, our MD&C Committee considered the following:

u

Industry: companies with our6-digit GICS code (101020 – Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels)

u

Market Capitalization: companies+/-2.5x Apache’s market cap

u

Revenues: companies+/-2.5x Apache’s revenues

u

Assets: companies+/-2.5x Apache’s assets

u

Compete with Apache for talent

u

Headquartered in the United States

u

List Apache as a peer in their 2018 proxy statement

u

List a peer of Apache as a peer in their 2018 proxy statement

u

Considered an Apache peer by proxy advisory firms

In addition, we use the most recent compensation data provided by our Consultant, industrysize-based surveys, and our own labor market data.

The MD&C Committee believes that, in combination, the above criteria generate a tailored peer group that reflects the size and complexity of Apache’s business, as well as the labor market in which we compete for talent. We also relied on this peer group for the relative TSR measurement within our active performance share programs for the period 2018 and prior.

2018 COMPENSATION PEER GROUP AND TSR PERFORMANCE PEER GROUP

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

EOG Resources, Inc.

Noble Energy Inc.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation

Hess Corporation

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

ConocoPhillips Company

Marathon Oil Corporation

Pioneer Natural Resources Company

Devon Energy Corporation

Murphy Oil Corporation

2019 Peer Groups

Due to Apache’s financial strength, operational characteristics, size, and scope, the MD&C Committee requested a comprehensive review and analysis of the 2018 peer group. In reviewing the 2018 peer group, and after considering all of the inputs described above under “Peer Groups and Data”, as well the results of the comprehensive review and analysis, the MD&C Committee has selected a separate Compensation Peer Group and TSR Performance Peer Group for 2019. In the E&P business, these two groups serve different objectives and allow the MD&C Committee to take into account complexity of our operations with respect to compensation and production mix with respect to share performance. The 2019 peer groups and the key factors that led to their composition are as follows:

Compensation Peer Group

The MD&C Committee refers to data regarding compensation awarded to similarly-situated officers by companies in the Compensation Peer Group to ensure that our NEOs’ base salaries, target annual incentive compensation award opportunities, and equity grants are competitive. The Compensation Peer Group is intended to reflect E&P companies that

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

53


operate in the United States and internationally, compete with Apache for executive talent, and have comparable activity and scope of operations. This group was developed taking into consideration metrics including revenue, market capitalization, enterprise value, investment strategy, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), leverage and liquidity, production, capital budget, comparability of asset portfolio, and the availability of compensation data. The 2019 Compensation Peer Group is as follows:

2019 COMPENSATION PEER GROUP

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

EOG Resources, Inc.

Noble Energy Inc.

ConocoPhillips Company

Hess Corporation

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Devon Energy Corporation

Marathon Oil Corporation

Encana Corporation

Murphy Oil Corporation

The newly constituted 2019 Compensation Peer Group required the removal of two compensation peers from the 2018 Compensation Peer Group that do not have international operations (Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Pioneer Natural Resources Company). We have added in their place a single peer that operates in the United States and internationally (Encana Corporation).

INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

  Compensation
Peer

Africa

Asia

Australia

Europe

North
America
(non-U.S.)

South  
America  

A

X

X

BXXXXXX
CX
DX
EXXXX
FXXXXX
GXXX
HXXXX
IXX
JXX
Apache

X

X

X

*Location data as of September 11, 2018, the date the MD&C Committee approved the compensation peer group. All of these peer companies also operate in the United States. The composition of this peer group will be reviewed annually.

TSR Performance Peer Group

The MD&C Committee refers to the TSR Performance Peer Group to evaluate our relative TSR performance for purposes of the performance-based awards. Unlike the Compensation Peer Group, the 2019 TSR Performance Peer Group generally reflects a relevant industry cross section of E&P companies that compete with Apache in the commodity marketplace as follows:

2019 TSR PERFORMANCE PEER GROUP

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Devon Energy Corporation

Marathon Oil Corporation

Antero Resources Corp.

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Murphy Oil Corporation

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation

Encana Corporation

Noble Energy Inc.

Cimarex Energy Co.

EOG Resources, Inc.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Concho Resources Inc.

EQT Corporation

Pioneer Natural Resources Co.

ConocoPhillips Company

Hess Corporation

54

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


The new 2019 TSR Performance Peer Group consists of independent E&P companies that produce the full hydrocarbon value stream, representing a balanced mix of those that favor crude oil production and those that favor the production of natural gas and natural gas liquids, thus augmenting the current peer group, which is heavily weighted toward crude oil production and therefore does not capture Apache’s market competition for our increased production of natural gas and natural gas liquids from Alpine High, as shown in the chart below:

 

OIL > 55%

 

  

 

RELATIVELY BALANCED

 

  

 

OIL < 45% 

 

 

TSR Peer

 

  

 

Oil

 

  

 

Gas

 

  

 

NGLs

 

  

 

TSR Peer

 

  

 

Oil

 

  

 

Gas

 

  

 

NGLs

 

  

 

TSR Peer

 

  

 

Oil

 

  

 

Gas

 

  

 

NGLs 

 

A

  63%  22%  14%  F  55%  30%  15%  

L

  34%  49%  17%

B (new)

  74%  12%  14%  G  55%  39%  6%  

M (new)

  30%  45%  25%

C (new)

  62%  38%  0%  Apache ‘18  53%  35%  12%  

N (new)

  24%  59%  17%

D

  58%  28%  14%  H  53%  32%  15%  

O (new)

  4%  96%  0%

E

  58%  22%  20%  I  52%  40%  8%  

P (new)

  2%  72%  26%
        J  51%  35%  14%  

Q (new)

  1%  87%  12%
            

K

 

  45%

 

  37%

 

  18%

 

            

With respect to size, Apache falls in the middle band of the new TSR Performance Peer Group:

TSR PEER

 

 

 

REVENUE

 ($Billions) 

 

      

TSR PEER

 

 

 

 MARKET CAP 

($Billions)

 

      

TSR PEER

 

 

 

 ENTERPRISE VALUE 
($Billions)

 

 

I

 

 

37.1

     

 

I

 

 

76.2

     

 

I

 

 

84.6

A

 17.7     F 60.0     F 65.1

F

 16.0     A 53.1     A 60.4

K

 14.5     H 26.7     H 45.1

H

 13.0     C 26.0     C 30.1

E

 8.3     E 25.2     E 26.0

Apache

 7.2     D 16.0     Apache 22.3

J

 6.2     J 13.9     D 21.1

D

 6.1     Apache 13.3     Q 18.5

L

 5.0     K 12.7     L 18.1

Q

 4.8     L 11.3     J 17.8

N

 4.8     B 11.2     K 15.6

P

 4.1     N 8.5     B 13.5

C

 3.9     M 7.8     N 13.5

O

 3.2     G 5.5     P 10.4

G

 2.4     Q 4.8     M 8.5

M

 2.3     P 4.2     G 7.5

 

B

 

 

 

1.9

 

     

 

O

 

 

 

3.0

 

     

 

O

 

 

 

4.0

 

*Data in the two tables shown above as of December 11, 2018, the date the MD&C Committee approved the TSR peer group. The composition of the TSR peer group will be reviewed annually.

Role of the Board of Directors

 

 

Executive compensation decision makingdecision-making is a core Board responsibility. The independent members of the Board review, modify as needed, and approve the MD&C Committee’s recommendations for the CEO’sCEO and President’s total compensation. The entire Board is responsible for this same process in establishing the other NEOs’ compensation.

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

55


Role of the Management Development and CompensationMD&C Committee

 

 

The MD&C Committee, which met fivesix times in 2017,2018, assesses the effectiveness of our compensation programs. Its key responsibilities are to:

 

 u  

Review our goals and objectives, evaluate performance in light of such goals, and recommend the CEO’sCEO and President’s compensation to the Board for approval by the independent directors. This review is handled in independent sessions.

 

 u  

Make recommendations to the Board concerning the base salary, incentive, and equity-based compensation plans for executive officers other than the CEO.CEO and President.

 

 u  

Review and recommend to the Board broad-based, long-term compensation programs for executive andnon-executive employees.

 

 u  

Ensure compensation does not incentivize excessive risk.

 

 u  

Review, and discuss with management, CEO and management succession planning for the organization and management development.

 

 u  

Administer our equity-based compensation plans and approve, award, and administer grants under the same, including certification of performance goals and their achievement.

 

 u  

Make recommendations to the Board regarding our equity-based compensation plans.

 

 u  

Prepare a summary of the grants and awards made under our equity-based compensation plans and programs for the MD&C Committee for use in our proxy statement.

 

 u  

Address any other duties or responsibilities expressly delegated to the MD&C Committee by the Board relating to our equity-based compensation plans and programs.

Each of the MD&C Committee’s fivefour members meets the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ listing standards. Each member of the MD&C Committee also is an outside director within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The MD&C Committee’s charter is available on our website.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

 

 

The Board has authorized the MD&C Committee to retain an independent compensation consultant. The MD&C Committee engaged the Consultant to provide independent compensation advice and data. The Consultant annually assesses our compensation program’s potential for risk and its competitiveness relative to our peers. The Consultant receivedde minimis compensation for limited advisory services provided with respect to broad-based compensation in 2017.2018.

Each year the MD&C Committee reviews the independence of the Consultant and obtains written certification that the Consultant complies with its own independence rules. The MD&C Committee determined that the Consultant was independent during 2017.2018.

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

49


Role of Management

 

 

In addition to the use of the Consultant, the MD&C Committee receives compensation recommendations and evaluations of the executive group from the CEO.CEO and President. The MD&C Committee, along with each of the independent directors, is authorized by the Board to obtain information from, and work directly with, any employee in fulfilling its responsibilities. Our senior vice president of human resources prepares materials for the CEO and President and the MD&C Committee for the exercise of their distinct, but interrelated, compensation responsibilities. The MD&C Committee also utilizes the data provided by the Consultant, including recommendations for the associated compensation values derived from their reports. The MD&C Committee carefully considers the recommendations of the CEO and President, management, and the Consultant to reach final determinations in order to recommend actions to the Board.

56

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement


Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Programs

The MD&C Committee does not believe our compensation programs encourage inappropriate risk taking. The MD&C Committee, with assistance from the Consultant, arrived at this conclusion for the following reasons:

 

 u  

Our employees receive both fixed and variable compensation. The fixed portion provides a steady income regardless of the Company’s stock performance. This allows executives to focus on the Company’s business without an excessive focus on the Company’s stock price performance.

 

 u  

The goals and objectives for the annual cash incentive bonuscompensation plan are set to avoid overweighting any single factor that, if not achieved, would result in the loss of a large percentage of compensation.

 

 u  

Our equity awards for executives generally vest over threethree- to five-yearfour-year periods, which discourages short-term risk taking. Our substantial equity holding requirements extend these time frames further.

 

 u  

Our equity ownership requirements encourage a long-term perspective by our executives.

 

 u  

Our equity compensation plan provides that, unless otherwise specifically provided in an award agreement for certain events, like retirement, our executives’ unvested long-term equity compensation is forfeited upon voluntary termination.

 

 u  

Our incentive programs have been in place for many years, and we have seen no evidence that they encourage excessive risk taking.

 

 u  

Essentially all of our employees participate in our equity-based compensation programs, regardless of business unit, which encourages consistent behavior across the Company.

Tax Legislation Related to Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes a limit, with certain exceptions, on the amount that a publicly-held corporation may deduct in any tax year commencing on or after January 1, 1994, for the compensation paid or accrued to its chief executive officer and three highest compensated officers (other than the principal executive officer or the principal financial officer).certain highly-compensated employees. The MD&C Committee periodically reviews our compensation plans based upon these regulations to determine what further actions or changes, if any, would be appropriate.

Our 2005 Stock Option Plan, 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, and 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan were approved by our shareholders and grants made under such plans qualify as “performance-based” under the regulations. Our existing annual cash incentive compensation plan and special achievement bonuses do not meet the requirements of the regulations, as the shareholder approvals necessary for exemption were not sought. However, these plans operate similarly to prior or other existing plans and are designed to reward the contribution and performance of employees and to provide a meaningful incentive for achieving Apache’s goals, which in turn enhances shareholder value. No further grants can be made under the 2005 Stock Option Plan, 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, or 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. While the MD&C Committee cannot predict how our compensation policies may be further affected by this limitation, it is anticipated that executive compensation paid or accrued pursuant to our compensation plans that have not met the requirements of the regulations will not result in any material loss of tax deductions in the foreseeable future.

On December 22, 2017, the President signed H.R. 1, the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” into law. The new law repeals certain exceptions to the deductible limit for performance-based compensation for tax years beginning after 2017. In addition,

50

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


the new law requires compensation of the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and three highest compensated officers (“covered employees”) to be subject to the limit. Once an employee is treated as a covered employee in a tax year after December 31, 2016, the individual remains a covered employee for all future years, including once they are no longer employed by the corporation or with respect to payments made after the death of a covered employee. The new law does provide for a transition rule to these Section 162(m) changes whereby the expansion of the rules mentioned above does not apply to remuneration paid under a written, binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017, which is not materially modified on or after this date. While the MD&C Committee cannot predict how our compensation policies may be further affected by this limitation,these limitations, it is anticipated that certainexecutive compensation paid or accrued pursuant to our executivescompensation plans that have not met the requirements of this new lawthe regulations will not be deductible.result in any material loss of tax deductions in the foreseeable future.

Internal Revenue Code sectionSection 409A requires “nonqualified deferred compensation plans” to meet requirements in order to avoid acceleration of the recipient’s federal income taxation of the deferred compensation. The Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations in April 2007 regarding the application of Section 409A, which were generally effective

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

57


January 1, 2009. Prior to effectiveness, companies were expected to comply in “good faith” with the statute, taking note of the interim guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service. We amended several of our benefit plans in order for them to be exempt from Section 409A, while we continue to provide benefits through several plans that remain subject to Section 409A. The terms of these plans were amended before January 1, 2009, as necessary, and are intended to meet the requirements of the final regulations.

Management Development and CompensationMD&C Committee Report

The Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Apache Corporation reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above, and based upon such review and discussion, recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

 

March 23, 201827, 2019

  

Members of the Management Development and

Compensation Committee

  William C. Montgomery, Chairman
  Annell R. Bay
  Rene R. Joyce
  Daniel W. Rabun

 

58

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

51


Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the compensation for the individuals listed below for all services rendered to the Company and its subsidiaries during fiscal years 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015.2016. The persons included in this table are the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (the “NEOs”) who served as executive officers of the Company during 2017.2018.

 

 Name and
 Principal Position

 (a)

 

Year

(b)

  

Salary

($)
(c)

  Bonus(1)
($)
(d)
  Stock
Awards(2)
($)
(e)
  Option
Awards(2)
($)
(f)
  

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation(3)
($)
(g)

  

Change in

Pension

Value and
Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(4)
($)
(h)

  

All Other

Compensation(5)
($)
(i)

  

Total

($)
(j)

 

 

 John J. Christmann IV

Chief Executive Officer and President

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,317,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,589,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,605,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

620,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,433,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,984,860

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,345,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,459,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526,239

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,416,196

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,081,551

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,059,310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,659,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

339,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,139,831

 

 

 

 Stephen J. Riney

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

725,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,060,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

521,981

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,118,506

 

(6) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

291,652

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,717,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,680,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

425,248

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,161,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

225,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,167,413

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

578,437

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,254,669

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

750,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

104,883

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,187,989

 

 

 

 P. Anthony Lannie

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,077,622

 

 

 

 

 

 

354,363

 

 

 

 

 

 

513,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

238,392

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,858,377

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,836,784

 

 

 

 

 

 

354,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

916,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

208,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,990,304

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,713,954

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

700,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

190,647

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,279,601

 

 

 

 W. Kregg Olson

Executive Vice President, Corporate Reservoir Engineering

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,923,710

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

460,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

218,502

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,555,335

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,101,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,122

 

 

 

 

 

 

825,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

186,998

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,066,305

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,512,952

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

600,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

169,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,907,450

 

 

 

 Timothy J. Sullivan

Executive Vice President, Operations

Support

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,923,710

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

460,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,237

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,528,070

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,101,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,122

 

 

 

 

 

 

825,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

382,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,262,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

464,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,590,149

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

550,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,197,119

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,801,852

 

 

                                    

 Name and
 Principal Position

 (a)

 

Year

(b)

  

Salary

($)
(c)

  Bonus
($)
(d)
  Stock
Awards(1)
($)
(e)
  Option
Awards(1)
($)
(f)
  

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation(2)
($)
(g)

  

Change in

Pension

Value and
Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(3)
($)
(h)

  

All Other

Compensation(4)
($)
(i)

  

Total

($)
(j)

 

 

 John J. Christmann IV

Chief Executive

Officer and

President

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,488,299

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,589,243

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,327,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

496,775

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,201,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,300,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,317,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,589,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,605,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

620,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,433,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,984,860

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,345,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,459,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526,239

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,416,196

 

 

 

 Stephen J. Riney

Executive Vice

President and Chief

Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

725,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,441,076

 

 

 

 

 

 

576,365

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,265,523

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

224,782

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,232,746

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

725,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,060,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

521,981

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,118,506

 

(5) 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

291,652

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,717,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,680,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

425,248

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,161,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

225,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,167,413

 

 

 

 P. Anthony Lannie

Executive Vice

President and

General Counsel

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,417,923

 

 

 

 

 

 

404,994

 

 

 

 

 

 

743,580

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

181,926

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,423,423

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,077,622

 

 

 

 

 

 

354,363

 

 

 

 

 

 

513,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

238,392

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,858,377

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

675,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,836,784

 

 

 

 

 

 

354,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

916,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

208,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,990,304

 

 

 

 Timothy J. Sullivan

Executive Vice President,

Operations

Support

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,958,948

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,119

 

 

 

 

 

 

688,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

343,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,943,585

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,923,710

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

460,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,237

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,528,070

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,101,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,122

 

 

 

 

 

 

825,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

382,978

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,262,285

 

 

 

 Grady L. Ables

Senior Region Vice

President, North Sea,

Egypt, and Houston

Operations

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

575,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,794,111

 

 

 

 

 

 

189,741

 

 

 

 

 

 

593,831

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

486,517

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,639,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                    

 

 (1)

With the exception of Mr. Riney in 2015, the NEOs were not entitled to receive payments that would be characterized as bonus payments. Mr. Riney received aone-time payment in connection with joining the Company in 2015. See footnote (3) for payments under the Company’s incentive compensation plan.

(2)

Value of RSU and stock option awards made during the fiscal year based upon aggregate grant date fair value, determined in accordance with applicable FASB ASC Topic 718. The discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards can be found in the footnotes to the Grants of Plan Based Awards Table below and in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. For stock options, the estimated fair value is based upon principles of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model utilizes numerous arbitrary assumptions about financial variables such as interest rates, stock price volatility, and future dividend yield. The value of the RSU and stock option awards is expensed ratably over the term of the award.

 

 (3)(2)

Amounts reflected under column (g) are paid pursuant to the Company’s incentive compensation plan as described under “Annual Cash Incentive Bonus”Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, except as described in footnote (6)(5) below.

 

 (4)(3)

Earnings from theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table are not included as they are not above-market or preferential earnings.

 

 (5)(4)

For additional information on All Other Compensation, see discussion, table, and footnotes below.

 

 [6](5)

Includes the amount paid under the 2015 performance contingent cash plan. Because Mr. Riney joined the Company after the start date of the 2015 Performance Share performance period, he received a performance contingent cash plan in place of performance shares. The payout of his award was based on the same metrics and targets used in the 2015 Performance Share program.

 

52

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

59


All Other Compensation

Officers participate in two qualified retirement plans. The 401(k) Savings Plan provides a match up to the first eight percent of base pay and incentive bonus, and the Money Purchase Retirement Plan provides an annual six percent Company contribution. Additionally, officers can elect to participate in theNon-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan to defer beyond the limits in the 401(k) Savings Plan and continue Company contributions, which exceed the limits in the qualified plans. The investment choices mirror those in the 401(k) Savings Plan and the Money Purchase Retirement Plan. The Deferred Delivery Plan allows officers the ability to defer income in the form of deferred units from the vesting of RSUs under the Company’s 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, and 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan. The contributions into bothnon-qualified plans are reported in theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table. The Company does not have a defined benefit plan for U.S. employees.

Apache provides U.S. employees with two times their base salary under group term life insurance. Executives receive the first $50,000 of coverage under the same group term life insurance plan, and the remaining amount to bring them up to two times salary is provided in the form of wholeuniversal life insurance policies.

During 2017,2016-2018, the Board required John J. Christmann IV to use the Company’s aircraft for all air travel for security reasons and to facilitate efficient business travel, unless good business judgment required otherwise. Even though the Company considers these costs a necessary business expense rather than a perquisite for Mr. Christmann, in line with SEC guidance, the following table includes the amounts attributable to each NEO’s personal aircraft usage. Executives are not reimbursed for the taxes on the income attributable to the personal use of corporate aircraft. The methodology for the valuation ofnon-integral use of corporate aircraft for disclosure in the Summary Compensation Table, in compliance with SEC guidance, calculates the incremental cost to the Company for personal use of the aircraft based on the cost of fuel and oil per hour of flight; trip-related inspections, repairs and maintenance; crew travel expenses;on-board catering; trip-related flight planning services; landing, parking, and hangar fees; supplies; passenger ground transportation; and other variable costs. Additionally, the value of trips attributable to philanthropic interests was included, even though they are seen as contributing to the goodwill of the Company. In addition, Standard Industry Fare Level tables, published by the Internal Revenue Service, are used to determine the amount of compensation income that is imputed to the executive for tax purposes for personal use of corporate aircraft.

In addition to the benefits for which all employees are eligible, the Company also covers the cost of a comprehensive annual physical and the full cost of enhanced long-term disability coverage for executive officers.

The Company provides various forms of compensation related to expatriate assignment that differ according to location and term of assignment, including: foreign service premium, foreign assignment tax equalization, location pay, housing and utilities, home leave and travel, goods and services allowance, relocation expense, and tax return and visa preparation. These items have been reflected in the following table under Foreign Assignment Allowances for the amounts that pertain to Mr. Sullivan.Sullivan and Mr. Ables. Mr. Sullivan, as region vice president—Canada, resided in Canada from January 2013 to June 2015.2015, and Mr. Ables, as region vice president—Canada resided in Canada from July 2015 to July 2016.

 

60

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

53


The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the amounts for fiscal years 2018, 2017, 2016, and 20152016 under “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table:

 

Name Year 

Company
Contributions
Retirement
Plans

($)

 

Company
Contributions

Non-Qualified
Plans

($)

 Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)
 Use of 
Company 
Property 
($) 
 Enhanced
Long-Term
Disability
Coverage &
Annual
Physicals
($)
 Dividend
Equivalents
on Unvested
Restricted
Stock Units
($)
 Foreign 
Assignment 
Allowances 
($) 
 Domestic
Relocation
Allowance
and
Expenses
($)
 Total  ($)   Year 

Company
Contributions
Retirement
Plans

($)

 

Company
Contributions

Non-Qualified
Plans

($)

 Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)
 

Use of 

Company 

Property 

($) 

 Enhanced
Long-Term
Disability
Coverage &
Annual
Physicals
($)
 Dividend
Equivalents
on Unvested
Restricted
Stock Units
($)
 

Foreign  

Assignment  

Allowances  

($)  

 Domestic
Relocation
Allowance
and
Expenses
($)
 Total ($)  

John J. Christmann IV

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

490,344

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,465 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,915

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

620,990 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

370,270

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,698

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,517 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,790

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

496,775

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

351,274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,795 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,879

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526,239 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

490,344

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,465 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,915

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

620,990 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

205,017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,765

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,809 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,879

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

339,870 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

351,274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,795 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,879

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526,239 

 

 

 

Stephen J. Riney

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

228,040

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,862

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,713 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,037

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

291,652 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

161,425

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,334

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

672 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

224,782 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

164,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,399

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,444 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

225,497 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

228,040

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,862

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,713 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,037

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

291,652 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45,981

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

104,883 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

164,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,399

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,444 

 

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

225,497 

 

 

 

P. Anthony Lannie

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

186,740

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

238,392 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

129,820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

181,926 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

157,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,226

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

208,147 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

186,740

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

238,392 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

140,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,226

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

190,647 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

157,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,226

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

208,147 

 

 

 

W. Kregg Olson

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

218,502 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

136,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

186,998 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

169,498 

 

 

 

 

Timothy J. Sullivan

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,054

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(33,443

 

 

) (b) (c) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,237 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

115,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,241

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,415

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,462  

 

 

(b)(c) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

343,018 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

129,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,084

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,182

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

193,212

 

 

  (b) (c) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

382,978 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,054

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(33,443) 

 

 

(b)(c) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,237 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74,317

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,849

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,072,754

 

 

  (b) (c) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,197,119 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

129,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,084

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,182

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

193,212  

 

 

(b)(c) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

382,978 

 

 

 

Grady L. Ables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,780

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

331,755  

 

 

(b)(c) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

486,517 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

(a)

These amounts for 2018, 2017, 2016, and 20152016 are for use of corporate aircraft.

 

(b)

Executives assigned to foreign countries typically incur a change in their overall tax liability because most of the components of assignment compensation that are provided in addition to base salary are taxable in the United States and in the foreign country. Therefore, the Company’s expatriate assignment policy provides that it will be responsible for any additional foreign or U.S. taxes due as a direct result of the international assignment and the executive remains financially responsible for the tax which he/she would have incurred if he/she had continued to live and work in the United States. Pursuant to this policy, the Company withheld from Mr. Sullivan’s compensation an amount equivalent to the taxes that would have been due had he remained in the United States. Those funds were used to help pay taxes due in the United States and in Canada during the period of his foreign assignment. The Company paid taxes due in excess of Mr. Sullivan’s withholding that were incurred as a result of their foreign assignments.

 

(c)

For Mr. Sullivan, the 2018 amount includes ($127,124) for tax equalization, $293,836 for foreign taxes paid and $750 for tax return preparation. The 2017 amount includes ($34,193) for tax equalization and $750 for tax return preparation. The 2016 amount includes $192,462 for tax equalization and $750 for tax return preparation. The 2015For Mr. Ables, the 2018 amount includes $882,198$16,385 for federal income tax, ($191,983) for tax equalization, $60,758$506,602 for housing and utilities, $56,333 in relocation allowance and expenses, $41,875 in foreign service premium, $26,795 for goods and services allowance, $4,045 for car allowance,taxes paid and $750 for tax return preparation.

 

54

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

61


Grants of Plan Based Awards Table

The table below provides supplemental information relating to the Company’s grants of RSUs and stock options during fiscal year 20172018 to the NEOs. There were no stock appreciation rights granted during fiscal year 2017.2018. Also included, in accordance with SEC rules on disclosure of executive compensation, is information relating to the estimated grant date fair value of the grants. Neither the values reflected in the table nor the assumptions utilized in arriving at the values should be considered indicative of future stock performance.

 

    Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
     Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units

(#)(3)

(i)

  

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)(4)

(j)

  

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

($/Sh)
(k)

  

Grant 

Date Fair 

Value 

of Stock 

and 

Option 

Awards 

($)(4) 

(l) 

     Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
     Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units

(#)

(i)

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)(5)

(j)

 

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

($/Sh)
(k)

 

Grant 

Date Fair 

Value 

of Stock 

and 

Option 

Awards 

($)(5) 

(l) 

 

Name

(a)

 

Grant Date

(b)

 




Threshold

($)

(c)

 

Target

($)

(d)

 

Maximum

($)

(e)

   

Threshold

(#)

(f)

 

Target

(#)(2)

(g)

 

Maximum

(#)

(h)

  

Grant Date

(b)

 




Threshold

($)

(c)

 

Target

($)

(d)

 

Maximum

($)

(e)

   

Threshold

(#)

(f)

 

Target

(#)(2)

(g)

 

Maximum

(#)

(h)

 

John J. Christmann IV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,690,000

 

 

(1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,380,000

 

 

(1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1,690,000(1)    3,380,000(1)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

83,754

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,609,424 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,628

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,708,221 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

114,491

 

 

 

 

 

 

228,982

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,780,082 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82,004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,589,238 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  32,057(3)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,483,277 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  48,086(4)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,224,939 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

120,855

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,589,243 

 

 

Stephen J. Riney

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

725,000

 

 

(1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,450,000

 

 

(1) 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  725,000(1)    1,450,000(1)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,522

 

 

 

 

 

 

83,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,096,238 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  11,626(3)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

537,935 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  17,439(4)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

806,903 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,509

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,842,411 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,256

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,217,942 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

576,365 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

521,981 

 

 

 

 

P. Anthony Lannie

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

540,000

 

 

(1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,080,000

 

 

(1) 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  540,000(1)    1,080,000(1)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,250,755 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,073

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

826,867 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,176

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,472,950 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

354,363 

 

 

 

 

W. Kregg Olson

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

(1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

(1) 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  8,169(3)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

377,980 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  12,254(4)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

566,993 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,292

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,158,132 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

765,578 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,798

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

404,994 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,931

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,123 

 

 

 

 

Timothy J. Sullivan

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

(1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

(1) 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  500,000(1)    1,000,000(1)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,292

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,158,132 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

765,578 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,638

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,276

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,193,364 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/05/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,931

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,123 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  6,618(3)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

306,215 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  9,928(4)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

459,369 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,952

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

328,119 

 

 

Grady L. Ables

 

 

 

 

 

 

  431,250(1)    862,500(1)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,504

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,035,144 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  6,561(3)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

303,577 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  9,842(4)   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

455,389 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/16/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,429

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

189,741 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Reflects estimated possible payouts under the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan. The estimated amounts are calculated based on the applicable annual bonus target and base salary earnings for each NEO in effect for the 20172018 measurement period. The maximum payout under the plan is 200 percent of target. The Company’s annual incentive compensation plan does not contain thresholds. Actual incentive bonus awards granted for 20172018 are reflected in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)

For the grants made on January 5, 2017,16, 2018, the number of RSUs granted is shown as the target number, while the maximum number assumes a multiple of 2.0. The threshold level shown is zero.

 

62

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

55


On January 5, 2017,16, 2018, pursuant to the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan, the Company established the 20172018 Business Performance Program Specifications for corporate and regional executives and key employees who were employed on or before December 31, 2016.2017. These employees, including the executives named in the Summary Compensation Table, were granted the right to receive RSUs, the number of which will be determined based on the Company’s achievement of three different measures of performance:

 

 -

Total shareholder return (“TSR”) as compared to a peer group of 11 companies (weighted 50%) – discussed below.

 

 -

Cash flow from operations and reserves added per debt adjusted share (weighted 25% each) – evaluated annually during the performance period against respective performance targets determined at the beginning of each year, with performance measured as a percentage above or below target. The threshold payout is established with achievement ten percent below target, and the maximum payout is set at achievement ten percent above target.

At the conclusion of the three-year performance period, which began on January 1, 2017,2018, and will end on December 31, 2019,2020, a calculation of the Company’s achievement of the performance measures will be made and the resulting percentage achievement will be applied to the target shares to derive the number of shares awarded. If achievement warrants, vesting will begin on January 1, 2020,2021, with 50 percent of the adjusted number of RSUs vesting immediately and 50 percent vesting as of January 1, 2021.2022. Employees must be employed during the entire performance period and on the date of vesting.

For the TSR performance measure, at the conclusion of the three-year performance period, the Company’s performance will be directly ranked within the peer group. If the Company’s TSR ranks from 1 to 9, this will result in the application of a single multiplier to 50% of the target number of RSUs as follows:

 

 

TSR Rank

 

 

1

 

 

2

 

 

3

 

 

4

 

 

5

 

 

6

 

 

7

 

 

8

 

 

9

 

 

10

 

 

11

 

 

12

 

Payout Multiple

 

 

2.00

 

 

2.00

 

 

1.75

 

 

1.50

 

 

1.25

 

 

1.00

 

 

0.80

 

 

0.60

 

 

0.40

 

 

0.00

 

 

0.00

 

 

0.00

However, if the Company ranks 10 – 12, there will be no achievement for this portion of the award.

TSR is determined by dividing (i) the sum of the cumulative amount of a company’s dividends for the performance period (assumingsame-day reinvestment into the company’s common stock on theex-dividend date) and the share price of the company at the end of the performance period minus the share price at the beginning of the performance period by (ii) the share price at the beginning of the performance period.

 

(3)

This column reflectsThese awards reflect the number of RSUs granted under the terms of the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan. The grant date fair value of these awards, calculated in accordance with FAS 123R, is based on a closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Except as discussed below, the RSUs are generallynon-transferable and no dividends are paid on such units until vested. The RSUs vest ratably over three years and may only be paid in cash.

The 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan is administered by the MD&C Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. RSUs granted under the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan are subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of reorganization, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, merger, consolidation, or other recapitalization of the Company. Upon both a change of control of the Company and termination of employment, all outstanding RSUs become automatically vested as of the date of such change of control. A change of control occurs when a person, partnership, or corporation acting in concert, or any or all of them, acquires more than 20 percent of the Company’s outstanding voting securities. A change of control shall not occur if, prior to the acquisition of more than 20 percent of the Company’s voting securities, such persons, partnerships, or corporations are solicited to do so by the Company’s Board of Directors.

(4)

These awards reflect the number of RSUs granted under the terms of the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan. The grant date fair value of these awards, calculated in accordance with FAS 123R, is based on a closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Except as discussed below, the RSUs are generallynon-transferable and no dividends are paid on such units until vested. The RSUs vest ratably over three years.

The 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan is administered by the MD&C Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. RSUs granted under the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan are subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of reorganization, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, merger, consolidation, or other recapitalization of the Company. Upon both a change of control of the Company and termination of employment, all outstanding RSUs become automatically vested as of the date of such change of control. A change of control occurs when a person, partnership, or corporation acting in concert, or any or all of them, acquires more than 20 percent of the Company’s outstanding voting securities. A change of control shall not occur if, prior to the acquisition of more than 20 percent of the Company’s voting securities, such persons, partnerships, or corporations are solicited to do so by the Company’s Board of Directors.

The 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan is administered by the MD&C Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. RSUs granted under the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan are subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of reorganization, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, merger, consolidation, or other recapitalization of

 

(4)

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

63


the Company. Upon both a change of control of the Company and termination of employment, all outstanding RSUs become automatically vested as of the date of such change of control. A change of control occurs when a person, partnership, or corporation acting in concert, or any or all of them, acquires more than 20 percent of the Company’s outstanding voting securities. A change of control shall not occur if, prior to the acquisition of more than 20 percent of the Company’s voting securities, such persons, partnerships, or corporations are solicited to do so by the Company’s Board of Directors.

(5)

This column sets forth the number of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to options granted under the terms of the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan. For stock options, the estimated fair value is based upon principles of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model utilizes numerous arbitrary assumptions about financial variables such as interest rates, stock price volatility, and future dividend yield.

The options granted under the terms of the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan are generallynon-transferable and become exercisable ratably over three years. The options were granted for a term of ten years, subject to earlier termination in specific circumstances related to termination of employment, and are not intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. The exercise price and any withholding tax requirements may be paid by cash and/or delivery or attestation of already-owned shares of the Company’s common stock.

Options granted under the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan are subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of reorganization, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, merger, consolidation, or other recapitalization of the Company. Upon both a change of control of the Company and termination of employment, all outstanding options become automatically vested so as to make all such options fully vested and exercisable as of the date of such change of control. A change of control occurs when a person, partnership, or corporation acting in concert, or any or all of them, acquires more than 20 percent of the Company’s outstanding voting securities. A change of control shall not occur if, prior to the acquisition of more than 20 percent of the Company’s voting securities, such persons, partnerships, or corporations are solicited to do so by the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

 5664   

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement


Options granted under the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan are subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of reorganization, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, merger, consolidation, or other recapitalization of the Company. Upon both a change of control of the Company and termination of employment, all outstanding options become automatically vested so as to make all such options fully vested and exercisable as of the date of such change of control. A change of control occurs when a person, partnership, or corporation acting in concert, or any or all of them, acquires more than 20 percent of the Company’s outstanding voting securities. A change of control shall not occur if, prior to the acquisition of more than 20 percent of the Company’s voting securities, such persons, partnerships, or corporations are solicited to do so by the Company’s Board of Directors.

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement

57


Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End Table

The table below provides supplemental information relating to the stock-based awards held by the NEOs as of December 31, 2017:2018:

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

   

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

Option Awards

     

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

(a)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)

(b)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)

(c)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

(d)

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

(e)

 

Option 

Expiration 

Date 

(f) 

   

Number
of Shares
or Units
of
Stock
That Have
Not

Vested

(#)

(g)

 

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not

Vested(1)

($)

(h)

 

Equity

Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)

(i)

 

Equity 

Incentive Plan 

Awards: 

Market or 

Payout Value 

of Unearned 

Shares, Units 
or 

Other Rights 

That Have Not 

Vested(1) 

($) 

(j) 

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)

(b)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)

(c)

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

(d)

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

(e)

 

Option 

Expiration 

Date 

(f) 

     

Number
of Shares
or Units
of
Stock
That Have
Not

Vested

(#)

(g)

 

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not

Vested(1)

($)

(h)

 

Equity

Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)

(i)

 

Equity

Incentive Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units
or

Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested(1)

($)

(j)

 

John J. Christmann IV

 2,417     135.83 05/07/2018   5,600(3) 236,432  80,268(4)  3,388,915(4) 3,200   ���     82.55  05/06/2019   12,500(2)   328,125  131,170(8)   3,443,213(8)  
   
 5,357        99.30  05/05/2020   25,376(3)   666,120  83,754(9)   2,198,543(9)  
   
 5,230        126.61  05/04/2021   10,241(4)   268,826  114,491(10)   3,005,389(10)  
   
 11,704        82.63  05/22/2022   39,086(5)   1,026,008   
 26,114        80.89  05/16/2023   48,086(6)   1,262,258   
 3,200     82.55 05/06/2019   4,843(2) 204,471  127,854(11)  5,397,996(11)
 5,357     99.30 05/05/2020   25,000(5) 1,055,500  83,754(16)  3,536,094(16) 86,416  43,208(3)      41.24  02/03/2026   32,057(7)   841,496   
 5,230     126.61 05/04/2021   20,568(6) 868,381  
 11,704     82.63 05/22/2022   50,752(10) 2,142,749   27,344  54,670(5)      63.25  01/05/2027      
 26,114     80.89 05/16/2023   10,241(13) 432,375  
 43,208  86,416(9)   41.24 02/03/2026   58,628(15) 2,475,274      120,855(11)      46.27  01/16/2028   
    82,004(14)   63.25 01/05/2027  

Stephen J. Riney

             7,452(6) 314,623  40,409(11)  1,706,068(11)                 18,000(12)   472,500  41,456(8)   1,088,220(8)  
             27,000(7) 1,139,940  27,509(16)  1,161,430(16)   
             16,040(10) 677,209                   8,020(3)   210,525  27,509(9)   722,111(9)  
 13,656  27,312(9)   41.24 02/03/2026   5,711(13) 241,118     
    26,934(14)   63.25 01/05/2027   19,256(15) 812,988                  5,711(4)   149,914  41,522(10)   1,089,953(10)  
   
 27,312  13,656(3)      41.24  02/03/2026   12,838(5)   336,998   
 8,978  17,956(5)      63.25  01/05/2027   17,439(6)   457,774   
    43,830(11)      46.27  01/16/2028   11,626(7)   305,183  

P. Anthony Lannie

 6,417     135.83 05/07/2018   3,839(2) 162,083  21,140(4)  892,531(4) 5,600        82.55  05/06/2019   6,684(3)   175,455  34,547(8)   906,859(8)  
 5,600     82.55 05/06/2019   7,739(6) 326,741  33,673(11)  1,421,674(11)   
 10,463     99.30 05/05/2020   13,367(10) 564,355  18,675(16)  788,459(16) 10,463        99.30  05/05/2020   10,000(13)   262,500  18,675(9)   490,219(9)  
 8,836     126.61 05/04/2021   10,000(12) 422,200     
 18,258     82.63 05/22/2022   5,317(13) 224,484   8,836        126.61  05/04/2021   5,317(4)   139,571  29,176(10)   765,870(10)  
 34,110     80.89 05/16/2023   13,073(15) 551,942     
 11,380  22,760(9)   41.24 02/03/2026      18,258        82.63  05/22/2022   8,716(5)   228,795   
    18,285(14)   63.25 01/05/2027  

W. Kregg Olson

 3,750     135.83 05/07/2018   3,544(2) 149,628  19,574(4)  826,414(4)
 34,110        80.89  05/16/2023   12,254(6)   321,668   
 4,400     82.55 05/06/2019   7,166(6) 302,549  31,179(11)  1,316,377(11)
 9,416     99.30 05/05/2020   12,377(10) 522,557  17,292(16)  730,068(16) 22,760  11,380(3)      41.24  02/03/2026   8,169(7)   214,436   
 7,952     126.61 05/04/2021   4,923(13) 207,849  
 16,736     82.63 05/22/2022   12,104(15) 511,031   6,095  12,190(5)      63.25  01/05/2027      
 31,486     80.89 05/16/2023     
 10,537  21,074(9)   41.24 02/03/2026         30,798(11)      46.27  01/16/2028   
    16,931(14)   63.25 01/05/2027  

Timothy J. Sullivan

 1,370     82.55 05/06/2019   1,000(8) 42,220  11,092(4)  468,304(4) 1,370        82.55  05/06/2019   6,189(3)   162,461  31,988(8)   839,685(8)  
 2,089     99.30 05/05/2020   2,138(2) 90,266  31,179(11)  1,316,377(11)   
 1,851     126.61 05/04/2021   5,016(6) 211,776  17,292(16)  730,068(16) 2,089        99.30  05/05/2020   4,923(4)   129,229  17,292(9)   453,915(9)  
 2,601     82.63 05/22/2022   12,377(10) 522,557     
 18,992     80.89 05/16/2023   4,923(13) 207,849   1,851        126.61  05/04/2021   8,070(5)   211,838  23,638(10)   620,498(10)  
 10,537  21,074(9)   41.24 02/03/2026   12,104(15) 511,031     
    16,931(14)   63.25 01/05/2027   2,601        82.63  05/22/2022   9,928(6)   260,610   
 18,992        80.89  05/16/2023   6,618(7)   173,723   
 21,704  10,537(3)      41.24  02/03/2026      
 5,643  11,288(5)      63.25  01/05/2027      
    24,952(11)      46.27  01/16/2028   

Grady L. Ables

 1,370        82.55  05/06/2019   1,000(14)   26,250  19,740(8)   518,188(8)  
   
 1,880        99.30  05/05/2020   4,365(3)   114,581  14,347(9)   376,609(9)  
   
 1,663        126.61  05/04/2021   4,332(4)   113,715  20,504(10)   538,230(10)  
   
 2,387        82.63  05/22/2022   7,652(5)   200,865   
 8,670  4,335(3)      41.24  02/03/2026   9,842(6)   258,353   
 3,121  6,244(5)      63.25  01/05/2027   6,561(7)   172,226   
    14,429(11)      46.27  01/16/2028   

 

(1)

Based on the per share closing price of the Company’s common stock of $42.22$26.25 on 12/29/2017.31/2018.

 

(2)

Vests on 05/13/2018.02/18/2019.

 

(3)

Vests on 11/11/2018.02/03/2019.

 

(4)

Final amount basedVests on the Company’s TSR and business performance from 01/01/2015 — 12/31/2017; vests ratably on 01/02/2018 and 12/31/2018.2020.

 

58

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

65


(5)

Vests ratably on 02/18/201801/05/2019 and 02/18/2019.01/05/2020.

 

(6)

Vests ratably on 06/15/2018.02/01/2019, 01/16/2020, and 01/16/2021.

 

(7)

Vests ratably on 02/18/2018, 02/18/01/2019, 01/16/2020, and 02/18/2020.01/16/2021. These units may only be paid in cash.

 

(8)

Vests on 02/05/2018.

(9)

Vests ratably on 02/03/2018 and 02/03/2019.

(10)

Vests ratably on 02/03/2018 and 02/03/2019.

(11)

Amount that vests will beFinal amount vested based on the Company’s TSR and business performance from 01/01/2016 — 12/31/2018; no payout unless vesting occurs.2018, as certified by the committee in January 2019. As a result, 50% of 12/31/2017,two-year results would have resulted in a 100% payout under the 2016 Performance Share Program had it been vested.shares granted vested and 50% will vest on the first anniversary of the first day following the performance period.

 

(12)

Vests on 10/01/2019.

(13)

Vests on 01/01/2020.

(14)

Vests ratably on 01/05/2018, 01/05/2019, and 01/05/2020.

(15)

Vests ratably on 02/01/2018, 01/05/2019, and 01/05/2020.

(16)(9)

Amount that vests will be based on the Company’s TSR and business performance from 01/01/2017 — 12/31/2019; no payout unless vesting occurs. As of 12/31/ 2017,2018,one-year results would have resulted in a 42.4%59% payout under the 2017 Performance Share Program had it been vested.

(10)

Amount that vests will be based on the Company’s TSR and business performance from 01/01/2018 — 12/31/2020; no payout unless vesting occurs. As of 12/31/2018,one-year results would have resulted in a 72% payout under the 2018 Performance Share Program had it been vested.

(11)

Vests ratably on 01/16/2019, 01/16/2020, and 01/16/2021.

(12)

Vests ratably on 02/18/2019 and 02/18/2020.

(13)

Vests on 10/01/2019.

(14)

Vests on 07/15/2019.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The table below provides supplemental information relating to the value realized upon the exercise of stock options and upon the vesting of RSUs and conditional grants during fiscal year 20172018 for each NEO:

 

  Option Awards       Stock Awards   Option Awards       Stock Awards 

Name

(a)

  

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise

(#)

(b)

   

Value
Realized on
Exercise

($)

(c)

        

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting

(#)(1)

(d)

   

Value
Realized
on Vesting

($)(1)

(e)

   

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise

(#)

(b)

   

Value
Realized on
Exercise

($)

(c)

        

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting

(#)(1)

(d)

   

Value
Realized
on Vesting

($)(1)

(e)

 

John J. Christmann IV

             86,925(2)          4,320,270(2)                    128,563(2)          5,394,796(2)       

Stephen J. Riney

             24,472             1,279,825                       30,890             1,283,305          

P. Anthony Lannie

             32,242             1,536,664                       33,188             1,408,139          

W. Kregg Olson

             29,804             1,420,566          

Timothy J. Sullivan

             21,814(3)          1,066,483(3)                    23,922(3)          1,017,582(3)       

Grady L. Ables

             12,631             548,481          
(1)

Reflects RSUs vested under the terms of the 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, the 2011 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, and/or the 2016 Omnibus Compensation Plan.

(2)

For Mr. Christmann, includes compensation of $838,075$666,105 that was deferred under the terms of Apache’s Deferred Delivery Plan related to the vesting of 16,534 RSUs.

(3)

For Mr. Sullivan, includes compensation of $59,640$40,930 that was deferred under the terms of Apache’s Deferred Delivery Plan related to the vesting of 1,000 RSUs.

 

66

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

59


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

The table below provides supplemental information relating to compensation deferred during fiscal year 20172018 under the terms of theNon-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan and/or the Deferred Delivery Plan by the NEOs:

 

Name

(a)

      

Executive
Contributions in
Last FY

($)

(b)

   

Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY

($)

(c)

   

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY

($)

(d)

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions

($)

(e)

   

Aggregate 
Balance 

at Last FYE 

($) 

(f) 

       

Executive
Contributions in
Last FY

($)

(b)

   

Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY

($)

(c)

   

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY

($)

(d)

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions

($)

(e)

   

Aggregate 

Balance 

at Last FYE 

($) 

(f) 

 

John J. Christmann IV

  (1)    403,960    490,344    (779,206(3)(4)  0    2,468,724  (1)     259,940    370,270    (1,063,089(3)  0    2,076,398 
 

 

 

 

 

(2) 

   838,075    0    26,701  (4)  0    1,428,798   (2)     666,105    0    44,044  (3)   0    1,351,899 

Stephen J. Riney

  (1)    126,880    228,040    (38,396(3)(4)  0    563,272  (1)     145,150    161,425    (253,803(3)  0    638,649 
 

 

 

 

 

(2) 

   0    0    0  0    0   (2)     0    0    0  0    0 

P. Anthony Lannie

  (1)    103,280    186,740    (229,471(3)(4)  0    1,367,106  (1)     70,540    129,820    (495,775(3)  0    1,091,872 
 

 

 

 

 

(2) 

   0    0    0  0    0   (2)     0    0    0  0    0 

W. Kregg Olson

  (1)    483,500    167,000    (315,118(3)(4)  0    3,788,323 
 

 

 

 

 

(2) 

   0    0    16,239  (4)  0    695,482 

Timothy J. Sullivan

  (1)    247,250    167,000    (46,801(3)(4)  0    2,352,969  (1)     246,750    115,400    (309,885(3)  0    2,419,040 
 

 

 

 

 

(2) 

   59,640    0    5,211  (4)  0    233,833   (2)     40,930    0    6,347  (3)   0    175,893 

Grady L. Ables

 (1)     170,500    100,000    (220,576(3)  0    1,010,147 
  (2)     0    0    0  (3)   0    0 
(1)

Non-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan — see discussion under “All Other Compensation” above. The amounts in column (b) are also included in the Summary Compensation Table under Salary andNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation, as appropriate, for 2017.2018. The amounts in column (c) are also included in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation for 2017.2018. The amounts in column (f) were previously reported in prior Summary Compensation Tables as follows: Mr. Christmann — $ 1,997,869;$2,234,600; Mr. Riney — $223,656;$677,676; Mr. Lannie — $ 1,581,604; Mr. Olson — $ 3,074,687;$1,645,662; and Mr. Sullivan — $ 1,453,208.$1,004,738.

(2)

Deferred Delivery Plan — see discussion under “All Other Compensation” above and footnote (2) to the table under “Equity Compensation Plan Information” above, as well as under footnotes (2) and (3) to the table under “Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table.” The amounts in column (b) are not included in the Summary Compensation Table for 2017.2018. No amounts in column (f) were previously reported in prior Summary Compensation Tables.

(3)

Includes unrealized gains/losses in theNon-Qualified Retirement/Savings Plan as follows: Mr. Christmann — $(815,273); Mr. Riney — $(97,059); Mr. Lannie — $(246,709); Mr. Olson — $(387,291); and Mr. Sullivan — $(154,475).

(4)

Earnings not included in column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table as they are not above-market or preferential earnings.

 

60

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

67


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The Company has entered into certain agreements and maintains certain plans that will require the Company to provide compensation to NEOs of the Company in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control of the Company. The amount of compensation payable to each NEO in each situation is listed in the following table for fiscal year 2017,2018, assuming termination had occurred on December 31, 2017.2018. All equity awards have been valued as of December 31, 2017.2018.

 

Name  Retirement
or Voluntary
Termination (3)
($)
   For Cause
Termination
($)
   Termination
without
Cause (4) ($)
   Change in
Control
Termination (5)
($)
   

Death 

($) 

   Retirement
or Voluntary
Termination (3)
($)
   For Cause
Termination
($)
   Termination
without
Cause (4) ($)
   Change in
Control
Termination (5)
($)
   

Death 

($) 

 

John J. Christmann IV

                    

Cash Benefits

   0    0    4,290,000    8,716,500    0      0    0    4,290,000    10,881,390    0   

Benefits Continuation

                    

Health

   0    0    23,335    45,834    0      0    0    23,039    45,073    0   

Life

   0    0    0    96    0      0    0    0    19,960    0   

Unvested & Accelerated

                    

Restricted Stock Units (1)

   0    0    11,319,864    19,738,208    19,474,333      0    0    9,248,594    14,093,496    14,093,496   

Stock Options

   0    0    38,399    84,688    84,688      0    0    0    0    0   

TOTAL

   0    0    15,671,598    28,585,326    19,559,021      0    0    13,561,633    25,039,919    14,093,496   

Stephen J. Riney

                    

Cash Benefits

   0    0    1,993,750    2,827,500    0      0    0    1,993,750    3,446,650    0   

Benefits Continuation

                    

Health

   0    0    1,256    2,442    0      0    0    1,256    2,442    0   

Life

   0    0    0    18,924    0      0    0    0    19,868    0   

Unvested & Accelerated

                    

Restricted Stock Units (2)

   0    0    3,490,041    6,053,358    6,053,358      0    0    3,104,405    4,833,188    4,833,188   

Stock Options

   0    0    12,136    26,766    26,766      0    0    0    0    0   

TOTAL

   0    0    5,497,183    8,928,990    6,080,124      0    0    5,099,411    8,302,148    4,833,188   

P. Anthony Lannie

                    

Cash Benefits

   0    0    1,721,250    2,376,000    0      0    0    1,721,250    2,837,160    0   

Benefits Continuation

                    

Health

   0    0    15,277    30,000    0      0    0    15,716    30,666    0   

Life

   0    0    0    96    0      0    0    0    96    0   

Unvested & Accelerated

                    

Restricted Stock Units

   0    0    2,951,623    5,354,486    5,354,486      2,108,295    0    2,498,179    3,782,827    3,782,827   

Stock Options

   0    0    10,114    22,305    22,305      0    0    0    0    0   

TOTAL

   0    0    4,698,264    7,782,887    5,376,791      2,108,295    0    4,235,145    6,650,749    3,782,827   

W. Kregg Olson

          

Timothy J. Sullivan

          

Cash Benefits

   0    0    1,593,750    2,170,000    0      0    0    1,593,750    2,627,000    0   

Benefits Continuation

                    

Health

   0    0    13,843    27,184    0      0    0    14,274    27,859    0   

Life

   0    0    0    96    0      0    0    0    19,792    0   

Unvested & Accelerated

                    

Restricted Stock Units

   0    0    2,569,903    4,566,474    4,566,474      1,558,358    0    1,970,326    2,997,529    2,997,529   

Stock Options

   0    0    9,364    20,653    20,653      0    0    0    0    0   

TOTAL

   0    0    4,186,860    6,784,407    4,587,127      1,558,358    0    3,578,350    5,672,180    2,997,529   

 

68

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

61


Name  Retirement
or Voluntary
Termination (3)
($)
   For Cause
Termination
($)
   Termination
without
Cause (4) ($)
   Change in
Control
Termination (5)
($)
   

Death 

($) 

   Retirement
or Voluntary
Termination (3)
($)
   For Cause
Termination
($)
   Termination
without
Cause (4) ($)
   Change in
Control
Termination (5)
($)
   

Death 

($) 

 

Timothy J. Sullivan

          

Grady L. Ables

          

Cash Benefits

   0    0    1,593,750    2,170,000    0      0    0    1,293,750    2,337,662    0   

Benefits Continuation

                    

Health

   0    0    15,277    30,000    0      0    0    15,531    30,383    0   

Life

   0    0    0    18,562    0      0    0    0    12,924    0   

Unvested & Accelerated

                    

Restricted Stock Units

   0    0    2,124,572    4,100,450    4,100,450      1,218,230    0    1,493,619    2,436,459    2,436,459   

Stock Options

   0    0    9,364    20,653    20,653      0    0    0    0    0   

TOTAL

   0    0    3,742,963    6,339,665    4,121,103      1,218,230    0    2,802,900    4,817,428    2,436,459   
(1)

On February 18, 2015, Mr. Christmann was granted a promotional award of 50,000 RSUs. The RSUs vested 12,500 on March 1, 2016, 12,500 on February 18, 2017, 12,500 on February 18, 2018, and the remaining 12,500 will vest on February 18, 2019. Upon vesting, Apache will issue one share of common stock for each RSU, and 7,500 out of each 12,500 shares will not be eligible for sale by Mr. Christmann until such time as he retires or terminates employment with the Company. If Mr. Christmann is terminated by the Company without cause and not by reason of becoming disabled or if he terminates employment for good reason, then all RSUs shall vest and the above restrictions shall lapse. On November 11, 2013, Mr. Christmann was granted 28,000 RSUs. The RSUs vested 5,600 on December 1, 2014, 5,600 on November 11, 2015, 5,600 on November 11, 2016, 5,600 on November 11, 2017, and the remaining 5,600 will vest on November 11, 2018. Upon vesting, Apache will issue one share of common stock for each RSU, and 3,360 out of each 5,600 shares will not be eligible for sale by Mr. Christmann until such time as he retires or terminates employment with the Company.

 

(2)

On February 18, 2015, Mr. Riney was granted 45,000 RSUs. The RSUs vested 9,000 on March 1, 2016, 9,000 on February 18, 2017, 9,000 on February 18, 2018, and the remaining 18,000 will vest ratably9,000 on February 18, 2019, and the remaining 9,000 will vest on February 18, 2020. Upon vesting, Apache will issue one share of common stock for each RSU, and 5,400 out of each 9,000 shares will not be eligible for sale by Mr. Riney until such time as he retires or terminates employment with the Company. If Mr. Riney is terminated by the Company without cause and not by reason of becoming disabled or if he terminates employment for good reason, then all RSUs shall vest and the above restrictions shall lapse.

 

(3)

Effective for prospectiveThe awards beginning in January 2014, employees 65allow continued vesting upon retirement after attaining age 55 and a certain combination of age and years of age with at least 15 years of recognized continuous service withservice. This provision also applies to performance share awards for eligible participants, provided that such retirement occurs after the Company are eligible to receive continued vesting of their equity awards upon retirement. The employee must provide the Company with a minimum written notificationfirst three months in advance of the retirement date. Anon-compete andnon-disparagement agreement must also be executed byperformance period (and not before). Three of the retiring employee in order to qualify for continued vesting of equity post-retirement. None of thefive current NEOs meet the age and service requirements to qualify for continued vesting of all or a portion of their outstanding awards beyond retirement.retirement, subject to certain conditions.

 

(4)

Reflects amounts in accordance with the Executive Termination Policy effective on February 18, 2015.

 

(5)

In addition to the foregoing, the Company has established an income continuance plan. The plan provides that all officers of the Company, including the NEOs, and all employees who have either reached the age of 40, served the Company for more than ten years, or have been designated for participation based upon special skills or experience, will receive monthly payments approximating their monthly income and continued health and life benefits from the Company for up to two years, if their employment is terminated as a result of a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the plan). In this event, continued health benefit premiums would be paid so that theafter-tax income would equal what it would have if the amount of the coverage were withheld on apre-tax basis.

Payments Made Upon Death or Disability

In addition to the benefits listed in the preceding table, payments will also be made under the Company’s life insurance plan in the event of death for the officers listed above. In the event of disability, these executive officers would benefit under the Company’s disability insurance plan.

CEO Pay Ratio

FollowingThe following is a reasonable estimate, prepared under applicable SEC rules, of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the annual total compensation of our median employee.

62

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


We identified the median employee using the employee population on December 31, 2017 that received taxable compensation (other than our Chief Executive Officer) for the calendar year 2017, which included our looking at gross compensation, excluding equity, within the calendar year 2017. The annual total compensation of our median employee (other than the Chief Executive Officer) for the calendar year 20172018 was $145,954. The original median employee identified began employment part-way through the year, therefore, a similarly situated employee was selected to provide a median employee that reflected compensation for a full year.$158,214 USD. As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, our Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation for 20172018 was $14,433,373.$15,201,447 USD. Based on the foregoing, our estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee was 96:1, down from 99:1.1 in 2017.

76

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

69


We did not have any substantial changes in our workforce population that we believe would significantly impact our pay ratio calculation. Therefore, we utilized the same median employee that we identified in our 2018 pay ratio analysis. (The original median employee identified began employment part-way through the year in 2017. Therefore, a similarly situated employee was selected as the median employee to reflect compensation for a full year.) The median employee is located in Houston, Texas, in a senior analyst role within corporate land administration. We evaluated gross compensation, excluding equity. The median employee’s compensation consists of approximately 64 percent base salary, 19 percent equity, seven percent annual incentive compensation, and 10 percent benefits and other compensation. No cost of ourliving adjustment was applied. We excluded the CEO in determining the median employee.

Our CEO’s 20172018 compensation was 73 percent long-term and equity-based, the ultimate value of which is related directly to common stock performance. As a result of this emphasis on equity and shareholder alignment, the CEO pay ratio is 35:32:1 when utilizing the same methodology that we used for determining the median employee, which excludes equity.

We determined that, as of December 31, 2017, our employee population consisted of 3,343 individuals (excluding the CEO), which included full-time and part-time employees that received taxable compensation located in the United States, Egypt, and the United Kingdom.

Our employee population has the following characteristics (the figures are rounded):

·

99 percent full-time and one percent part-time

·

74 percent U.S., 17 percent U.K., and nine percent Egypt

·

34 percent technical functions, 36 percent administrative/center functions, and 28 percent field operations, with the balance of approximately 1 percent in executive or other roles

·

Apache hires temporary employees to cover essential functions when employees are on leave of absence. Apache does not hire seasonal employees.

To stay competitive with the market, Apache participates in numerous benchmarking surveys relevant to the oil and gas industry, locations where we maintain offices, and functional areas.

This information is being provided for compliance purposes. Neither the CompensationMD&C Committee nor the executives of our company useduse the pay ratio measure in making compensation decisions.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2017,2018, William C. Montgomery, Annell R. Bay, Charles J. Pitman (who retired effective December 31, 2017),Rene R. Joyce, and Daniel W. Rabun served on the MD&C Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

No executive officer of the Company serves, or in the past year has served, as (i) a member of the compensation (or similar) committee or on the board of directors of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Company’s MD&C Committee or as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. During fiscal year 2017,2018, no member of the MD&C Committee (i) was an officer or employee of the Company, (ii) was formerly an officer of the Company, or (iii) had any business relationship or conducted any business with the Company other than as an independent director of the Company. The Board evaluated each member’s independence under the independence standards promulgated by NYSE and NASDAQ for compensation committees and determined that each member was independent for purposes of serving on the Company’s MD&C Committee.

Certain Business Relationships and Transactions

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which was last revised in September 2017. The Code of Business Conduct prohibits conflicts of interest between any director, officer, or employee and the Company. The Code of Business Conduct requires directors, officers, and employees to inform the Company of any transaction that involves related parties and that may give rise to a conflict of interest. Pursuant to its charter, the CG&N Committee reviews related party transactions on an ongoing basis to prevent conflicts of interest. The CG&N Committee reviews a transaction in light of the affiliations of the director, officer, or employee and the affiliations of such person’s immediate family. Transactions are presented to the CG&N Committee for approval before they are entered into or, if this is not possible, for ratification after the transaction has occurred. If the CG&N Committee finds that a conflict of interest exists, then it will determine the appropriate remedial action, if any. The CG&N Committee approves or ratifies a transaction if it determines that the transaction is consistent with the best interests of the Company. The determination of the CG&N Committee is documented in the Committee’s minutes. The Board of Directors reviews transactions to determine whether a transaction impairs the independence of a director and such determination is documented in the Board’s minutes. The Code of Business Conduct and the CG&N Committee charter are available on the Company’s website (www.apachecorp.com).

 

70

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

63


RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

(PROPOSAL NO. 11)

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the work of the independent auditor employed by the Company and establishes guidelines for the retention of the independent auditor for any permissible services. In performing these responsibilities, among other things, the Audit Committee (i) reviews the qualifications, performance, and independence of the independent auditor, (ii) reviews and evaluates the lead partner of the independent auditor having primary responsibility for the Company’s audit and ensures the rotation of such partners as required by law, and (iii) considers whether the audit firm should be rotated in order to maintain the independence between the independent auditor and the Company.

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm (the “independent auditors”), to audit the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2018.2019. Ernst & Young LLP served as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 20172018 and reported on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for that year, as well as the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP has served as the Company’s independent auditors since 2002. The Board believes that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company’s independent auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and, at the request of the Audit Committee, is asking you to ratify that appointment.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to respond to appropriate questions regarding Apache’s business.

Although shareholder ratification is not required, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’sCompany’s independent auditors for fiscal year 20182019 is being submitted for ratification at the annual meeting because the Board believes doing so is a good corporate governance practice. Furthermore, the Audit Committee will take shareholders’ opinions regarding the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP into consideration in future deliberations. If Ernst & Young LLP’s appointment is not ratified at the annual meeting, the Audit Committee will consider the engagement of other independent accountants. The Audit Committee may terminate Ernst & Young LLP’s engagement as the Company’s independent auditors without the approval of the Company’s shareholders whenever the Audit Committee deems appropriate.

The fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP for 20172018 and 20162017 were as follows:

 

  (amounts in thousands)       (amounts in thousands)     
Description  

2017

($)

   

2016

($)

   

2018

($)

   

2017

($)

 

Audit Fees(1)

   4,924    9,134     4,479    4,924  

Audit-Related Fees(2)

   1,018    528     723    1,018  

Tax Fees(3)

   324    303     481    324  

All Other Fees

       —         —  

Audit Fees were for professional services rendered for the annual audit of the consolidated financial statements included in the Form10-K, including the audit of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, the reviews of the financial statements included in the Forms10-Q, statutory audits, issuance of comfort letters, consents, and assistance and review of documents filed with the SEC. Ernst & Young LLP also served as the independent auditor of Altus Midstream Company (ALTM) for 2018. Fees for the audit of Altus Midstream Company’s annual consolidated financial statements were $585,000 for 2018, which were not included in the table above. The financial results of Altus Midstream Company were not consolidated into Company’s financial statements in 2017.

(1)

Audit Fees are primarily for the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Form10-K, including the audit of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, the reviews of the Company’s financial statements included in the Forms10-Qs, statutory audits, and other procedures required to be performed by the independent auditor to be able to form an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

(2)

Audit-Related Fees include fees billed

Audit-Related Fees were for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. Audit-related services include consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as “audit services,” and agreed upon or expanded audit procedures.

Tax Fees were for services related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. Audit-related services include consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as “audit services,” financial audits of employee benefit plans, and agreed upon or expanded audit procedures.

(3)

Tax Fees include fees billed for tax planning and compliance,tax-related and structuring-related consultation, and tax services related to potential acquisitions/dispositions.

All audit, audit-related, tax, and other services werepre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by Ernst & Young LLP was compatible with that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions. The Audit Committee has taken into consideration whether the provision ofnon-audit services by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.

None of the services described above were approved pursuant tode minimis exception provided in Rule2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of RegulationS-X promulgated by the SEC.

APACHE CORPORATION-2019 Proxy Statement

71


Approval of Independent Auditor Services and Fees

 

To ensure the independence of our independent auditors and to comply with the applicable securities laws, the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ Stock Market, and the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing, deliberating, and, if appropriate,pre-approving all audit, audit-related, andnon-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors. For that purpose, the Audit Committee has established a policy and related procedures regarding thepre-approval of all audit, audit-related, andnon-auditwith respect to services tothat may be performed by the Company’s independent auditors (the“Pre-Approval Policy”).

ThePre-Approval Policy provides that the Company’s independent auditors may not perform any audit, audit-related, ornon-auditservice for Apache, subject to those exceptions that may be permitted by applicable law, unless: (i) the service

64

APACHE CORPORATION-2018 Proxy Statement


has beenpre-approved by the Audit Committee or (ii) Apachethe Company engaged the independent auditors to perform the service pursuant to thepre-approval provisions of thePre-Approval Policy. In addition, thePre-Approval Policy prohibits the Audit Committee frompre-approving certainnon-audit services that are prohibited from being performed by the Company’s independent auditors by applicable securities laws.

Pursuant to thePre-Approval Policy, the Audit Committee haspre-approved certain categories of services to be performed by the independent auditors and a maximum amount of fees for each category. The Audit Committee annually reassesses these service categories and the associated fees.maximum fee limits annually. Individual projects within the approved service categories have beenpre-approved only to the extent that the fees for each individual project do not exceed a specified dollar limit, which amount is reassessed annually. The Committee also considers on acase-by-case basis specific engagements that are not otherwisepre-approved or that exceedpre-approved fee amounts. The Audit Committee grantspre-approval, subject to fee limits, for services that fall within that “All Other Fees” category on anengagement-by-engagement basis.

At least annually, the Audit Committee designates a member of the Audit Committee to whom it delegates itspre-approval responsibilities. That member has the authority to approve interim requests topre-approve any audit, audit-related, ornon-audit service,services and maximum fee limits, provided that the member informs the Audit Committee of his or her decision at the Audit Committee’s next regularscheduled meeting.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018.2019.

 

72

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

65


ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

(PROPOSAL NO. 12)

 

In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) and Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company is asking its shareholders to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (our “NEOs”) as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K. This proposal, commonly known as“say-on-pay,” gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on the design and effectiveness of our executive compensation programs.

As described in detail in the section of this proxy statement titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate, and retain our executive officers (including our NEOs), who are critical to our success. Under these programs, our NEOs are rewarded for the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals, corporate goals, and the realization of increased shareholder value. Please read the section of this proxy statement titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and the compensation tables that follow it, for additional details about our executive compensation programs.

At each of the Company’s annual meetings since the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, the Company’s shareholders have approved, oncast an advisory basis,vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs, as disclosed in the proxy statement for such meeting, and the Board and the MD&C Committee have considered the result of these shareholder votes in setting compensation policies and making compensation decisions for each of the fiscal years that has followed.

At the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, the Company’s shareholders again determined, on an advisory basis, that thesay-on-pay vote should be held on an annual basis. In accordance with this determination, we are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our NEOs as described in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies, and practices described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to voteFOR the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the NEOs, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative discussion, is hereby approved.

Thesay-on-pay vote is advisory and, therefore, not binding on the Company, the MD&C Committee, or our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors and our MD&C Committee value the opinions of our shareholders, and to the extent there is a significant vote against the compensation paid to our NEOs, as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and will evaluate what, if any, further actions are necessary to address those concerns.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

 

66

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

73


FUTURE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

 

Shareholders are entitled to submit proposals on matters appropriate for shareholder action at next year’s annual meeting consistent with regulations of the SEC and the Company’s bylaws.

Proposals for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement

The SEC rules permit shareholders to submit proposals (other than director nominations) for inclusion in our proxy statement for next year’s annual meeting if the shareholder and the proposal meet the requirements specified in SEC Rule14a-8.

 

When to send these proposals. Any shareholder proposal submitted in accordance with SEC Rule14a-8 must be received by the Company’s corporate secretary on or before December 10, 2018.11, 2019.

 

Where to send these proposals. Proposals should be addressed to the Company’s corporate secretary at 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400.

 

What to include. Proposals must conform to and include the information required by SEC Rule14a-8.

Director Nominees for Inclusion in Next Year’s Proxy Statement (Proxy Access)

Our bylaws permit a shareholder or a group of shareholders (up to 20) who have owned an aggregate of at least 3% of Apache’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years the ability to submit director nominees (up to 25% of the Board) for inclusion in our proxy statement, if the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements set forth in Article IV, Section 14 of our bylaws.

 

When to send these proposals. Notice of director nominees submitted under Article IV, Section 14 of our bylaws must be received no earlier than November 10, 2018,11, 2019, and no later than the close of business on December 10, 2018.11, 2019.

 

Where to send these proposals. Proposals should be addressed to the Company’s corporate secretary at 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400.

 

What to include. Notice must include the information required by Article IV, Section 14 of our bylaws. Our bylaws are filed as an exhibit to the Company’s most recent annual report on Form10-K filed with the SEC, or a printed copy of our bylaws is available free of charge by writing to the Company’s corporate secretary at the address above.

Other Proposals of Nominees for Presentation at Next Year’s Annual Meeting

Our bylaws also provide that any shareholder proposal, including any director nomination, that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement (either under SEC Rule14a-8 or our proxy access bylaws, each as described above), may instead be presented directly at next year’s annual meeting if the submitting shareholder satisfies the requirements set forth in Article IV, Section 13 (with respect to director nominations) or Article IV, Section 12 (with respect to other proposals) of our bylaws.

 

When to send these proposals. Shareholder proposals, including director nominations, submitted under these bylaw provisions must be received by the Company’s corporate secretary not less than 120 days prior to the meeting, which is expected to be held in May 2019.2020.

 

Where to send these proposals. Proposals should be addressed to the Company’s corporate secretary at 2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056-4400.

 

What to include. Proposals must include the information required by Article IV, Section 13 of our bylaws (with respect to director nominations) or Article IV, Section 12 of our bylaws (with respect to other proposals). Our bylaws are filed as an exhibit to the Company’s most recent annual report on Form10-K filed with the SEC, or a printed copy of our bylaws is available free of charge by writing to the Company’s corporate secretary at the address above.

 

Discretion to vote proxies on these proposals. If any shareholder proposal, including any director nomination, is properly presented directly at next year’s annual meeting, proxies will be voted on such proposals in accordance with the judgment of the management representatives who shall have been granted the authority to vote such proxies.

The Company’s annual report on Form10-K and our other reports filed with the SEC are made available on our website at www.sec.gov or are made available to read or copy at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20549. You may obtain information about the Public Reference Room by contacting the SECat 1-800-SEC-0330.

 

74

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

67


SHAREHOLDERS WITH THE SAME LAST NAME AND ADDRESS

 

The SEC rules permit companies and intermediaries (such as brokers) to implement a delivery procedure known as “householding.” Under this procedure, multiple Apache shareholders who reside at the same address may receive a single set of proxy materials, unless one or more of the shareholders has provided contrary instructions. This procedure reduces printing costs and postage fees and saves natural resources.

If you hold your shares in “street name” (your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee), you may revoke your consent to householding at any time by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717 or calling Broadridge at1-800-542-1061. You can also request information about householding from your broker or bank.

If you are a shareholder of record (your shares are held in your own name and not held in a brokerage account) who received a household mailing this year, and you would like to have additional copies of proxy materials mailed to you or if you would like to opt out of householding for future mailings, please send your written request to EQ Shareowner Services, Attn: Householding/Apache Corporation, P. O. Box 64854, St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854.

 

68

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

75


SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

 

Solicitation of proxies for use at the annual meeting may be made in person or by mail, telephone, or other electronic means by directors, officers, and regular employees of the Company. These persons will receive no special compensation for any solicitation activities. The Company has requested banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, trustees, nominees, and fiduciaries to forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares of the Company’s common stock for whom they are record holder, and the Company will, upon request, reimburse reasonable forwarding expenses. The Company has retained Georgeson LLC to assist in soliciting proxies from brokers, bank nominees, and other institutional holders for a fee not to exceed $14,500 plus expenses. All costs of the solicitation will be borne by the Company.

By order of the Board of Directors

APACHE CORPORATION

 

LOGO

Rajesh Sharma

Corporate Secretary

NOTE: Shareholders are requested to promptly vote their shares using one of the methods explained on pages 112 and 123 of this proxy statement.

 

76

APACHE CORPORATION-20182019 Proxy Statement

69


 

LOGO

NOTICE OF

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

MAY 24, 201823, 2019

AND PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

               APACHE CORPORATION

                    | 2000 POST OAK BOULEVARD, SUITE 100

                    | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77056-4400

                    | 713.296.6000

                    | WWW.APACHECORP.COM

 LOGO


 

            
                        
  

 

 

    LOGO 

Shareowner Services

P.O. Box 64945

St. Paul, MN 55164-0945

                                              
   
Address Change? Mark box, sign, and Indicate changes below:  ☐  

  TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR

  TELEPHONE, SEE REVERSE SIDE

  OF THIS PROXY CARD.

 
  

              
                      
                
 
              

 

    QR CODE     

 

  
                

TO VOTE BY MAIL AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS ON ALL PROPOSALS

BELOW, SIMPLY SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD.

 

 

 

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR” Proposals 1 through 12.

  
 Proposals 1-10.  Election of Directors:  
  FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN      FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN         
     1. Annell R. Bay      6.  John E. Lowe    
 2. John J. Christmann IV      7.  William C. Montgomery    
ò  Please fold here – Do not separate  ò
                     
     3. Chansoo Joung      8.  Amy H. Nelson    
 4. Rene R. Joyce      9.  Daniel W. Rabun    
 5. George D. Lawrence      10.  Peter A. Ragauss    
  FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN      FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN         
     1. Annell R. Bay      6.  John E. Lowe    
 2. John J. Christmann IV      7.  William C. Montgomery    
ò  Please fold here – Do not separate  ò
                     
     3. Juliet S. Ellis      8.  Amy H. Nelson    
 4. Chansoo Joung      9.  Daniel W. Rabun    
 5. Rene R. Joyce      10.  Peter A. Ragauss    
 11. Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Apache’s Independent Auditors     ☐  For          ☐ Against         ☐ Abstain         
 12. Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation of Apache’s Named Executive Officers     ☐  For          ☐ Against         ☐ Abstain 
 13. The Proxies are authorized to vote in their best judgment upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 
 THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTEDFOR PROPOSALS 1 THROUGH 12. 
        
 Date                                                              Signature(s) in Box                                          
   
      

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on Proxy. If held in

joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc.

 
         should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy.        
     
     


APACHE CORPORATION

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, May 24, 201823, 2019

10:00 a.m.

Hilton Houston Post Oak

2001 Post Oak Boulevard

Houston, Texas 77056

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for this Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at

http://www.apachecorp.com/AnnualMeetingwww.proxydocs.com/APA

 

LOGO

 proxy

 

APACHE CORPORATION – 20182019 PROXY

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors

for use at the Annual Meeting on May 24, 201823, 2019

By signing this proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint John J. Christmann IV, Stephen J. Riney, and P. Anthony Lannie as Proxies, with full power of substitution, and authorize them to represent the undersigned at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held May 24, 2018,23, 2019, or any adjournment thereof, and to vote all the shares of common stock of Apache Corporation held of record by the undersigned on March 26, 2018.25, 2019.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned stockholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” PROPOSALS 1 THROUGH 12.

For participants in the Apache 401(k) Savings Plan, if this proxy, is properly executed, then the shares credited to your account will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned. If no direction is given, if the card is not signed, or if the card is not received by May 21, 2018,20, 2019, then the shares credited to your account will be voted in proportion to directions received by Fidelity Management Trust Company, the trustee for the Apache 401(k) Savings Plan.

Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail

24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week

Your phone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares

in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.

 

LOGO

INTERNET/MOBILE

www.proxypush.com/apa

 

  

LOGO

PHONE

1-866-883-3382

 

  

LOGO

MAIL

Use the Internet to vote your proxy until

11:59 p.m. (central time)

on May 23, 2018.22, 2019.

Scan code below for mobile votingvoting.

  

Use a touch-tone telephone to

vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. (central time) on

May 23, 2018.22, 2019.

  

Mark sign and date your proxy

card and return it in the

postage-paid envelope provided.

If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your Proxy Card.